Placement of advance polls has Vancouver community groups crying foul about 2014 election

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      A housing activist has claimed that unequal distribution of advance polls "likely affected" the election results for Vancouver city council and the board of education.

      Rider Cooey pointed out that there were five advance polls west of Main Street and only two advance polls east of Main Street, which were open from November 4 to 12. An eighth poll was on Main Street at the Sunset Community Centre, serving residents on the east and west side of the city.

      "I have not focused on doing something to somehow rescue or alter this vote because I think it would be a longshot, in any case, and it involves more research than I've done," Cooey told the Straight by phone.

      Cooey said that he's flagging these issues now to ensure that there is more equality in the distribution of advance polls in the 2018 election.

      He made his comments shortly before council was set to hear the public's response to a motion from NPA councillor George Affleck asking staff to report back on complaints from voters in the 2014 election.

      In addition to concerns about advance polls, there have been media reports of polling stations running out of ballots on Election Day and voters on Musqueam land not being registered until shortly before the election.

      On November 15, the city extended voting hours at four of the 120 polls: Killarney Community Centre, Britannia Community Centre, Oakridge Centre, and Hastings elementary school.

      Affleck also wants staff to examine if any voter fraud resulted from the city allowing voters to cast ballots without furnishing identification at any polling station. In past elections, voters were sent to specific locations. He has also expressed concern about long lineups without any seating spaces for seniors.

      In October, 55 community organizations signed a letter written by Cooey outlining their objections to the placement of so many more advance polls on the West Side.

      "Geographically, more than a quarter of the city has no Advance Poll," the letter states. "The area comprises five contiguous neighbourhoods on the eastside, and is home to 26% of Vancouver's population: DTES-Chinatown-Strathcona, Grandview-Woodland, Riley Park, Kensington–Cedar Cottage, Renfrew-Collingwood."

      In addition, the letter states that Hastings-Sunrise—with a population of 33,992—was not well-served by one of the two East Side polls, which was at the Thunderbird Community Centre. It's four blocks from Boundary Road, which is the eastern edge of Vancouver.

      In a written response to Cooey, city clerk and chief election officer Janice MacKenzie pointed out that there was a 280 percent increase in advance-voting hours in the 2014 election from 2011.

      She noted that the eight locations were selected more than a year before the election.

      "When selecting locations for municipal voting, officials require sufficient space to accommodate about 1,000 voters for each site on each day of advance voting, and between 1,200 and 1,500 voters on general voting day," MacKenzie wrote. "The location requires extensive electrical outlets and back-up power to maintain connectivity for all of the equipment due to the electronic needs of the voting tabulators, accessible voting machines, the electronic voters list and other requirements. Fully secure internet is a key requirement."

      With regard to the Downtown Eastside, she stated that city staff visited 46 agencies and businesses and distributed election materials about voting times, locations, how to register, and how to apply to vote by mail.

      "The Roundhouse Community Centre is the closest advance voting location to the Downtown Eastside and is about 2.5 kilometres from the community," MacKenzie added.

      Cooey, however, has a problem with the city clerk, who's appointed by the Vision-controlled council, serving as the chief electoral officer. "Her decisions can help or hinder her employers' election, creating a conflict of interest for mayor and council," he claimed.

      Under provincial legislation, councils appoint the chief electoral officer but Elections B.C. oversees the financing of candidates and political parties.

      Meanwhile, former Vision Vancouver school trustee Ken Clement lost to NPA school board chair Christopher Richardson by 255 votes. This resulted in Vision losing control of the nine-member board, which includes three other NPA trustees and one Green trustee.

      Clement, the only aboriginal person ever elected to municipal office in Vancouver, told the Straight by phone that he initially considered challenging the results. However, he chose not to do this because didn't want to come across as a "sore loser".

      "I am still concerned that there are voters who were disenfranchised," Clement said.

      Clement added that he knows people didn't bother to vote because of the lack of advance polls in large areas of East Vancouver, where he has many supporters. Now, he worries that some East Side schools may be "on the chopping block" because Vision lost its majority.

      He said that he's "surprised" that Vision didn't take a "more proactive role" after the election.

      Vision Vancouver's Ken Clement lost a school-board race by 255 votes.
      Yolande Cole

      The 11th-place finisher in the race for 10 spots on council, the NPA's Ian Robertson, told the Vancouver Courier that he feels there were "irregularities", but the election is over and he's since moved on. Robertson lost to Vision candidate Geoff Meggs by 512 votes.

      When people have challenged election results in the past, they've sometimes based arguments on Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It guarantees the right to vote in federal and provincial elections.

      However, Section 3 does not mention "municipal" elections. According to Victoria lawyer John Waddell, who represents Elections B.C., the combined effect of Section 3 and Section 32 of the Constitution Act, 1982 does not offer any constitutional guarantee to vote in municipal elections.

      Section 32 outlines the basis upon which the charter's rights can be enforced.

      Therefore, Vancouver voters likely can't base any challenge of the 2014 election results on the charter's guarantee of their democratic rights.

      Comments

      5 Comments

      Tommy Khang

      Jan 21, 2015 at 1:49pm

      I find Clements comment rather funny - trying to blame his loss on lack of advance polls in areas of support. Last time I checked there is no excuse to not voting on election day period.

      Cooey's argument is equally as dumb - how many days of advance polling were there? Are you telling me that someone who want's to vote couldn't take time out of their lives to get to a polling station either via walking/biking/transit/bumming a ride etc? Come on, COPE wasn't going to win anyhow if this is what Cooey posits by having more advance voting stations in East Vancouver, he really needs to check the koolaid they have been giving him.

      Martin Dunphy

      Jan 21, 2015 at 4:28pm

      Tommy Khang:

      As usual, you denigrate those attempting to advance some advocacy for the marginalized in our society. Maybe reflect what it means to people without two loonies to rub together, perhaps an ID problem, perhaps a disability or mental-health or addiction issues, no transportation, computer, TV, and all those other things you take for granted in your privileged life. Then ask yourself who they would be inclined to vote for. Then ask yourself why these type of tactics have been used successfully by parties such as the Republicans in the U.S. (illegal? surely not!) for decades to influence elections.
      Then ask yourself why you label people who dare to speak out about it as "dumb" and "funny".

      Tommy Khang

      Jan 22, 2015 at 9:21am

      @Martin I truly enjoy our sparing, however I truly doubt that the fact that the eastside of Vancouver didn't have access to advance polls made any impact on the overall result of the election. Every single polling station (advanced or on election day) was open to all residents of the city, thus no single individual that was motivated to vote was truly restricted from voting based on geography.

      ID problems are hardly an excuse with the amount of acceptable forms and the ability to make a solemn deceleration of residence. Disabilities are covered by mail-in ballots or by the ability of the voter to ask for assistance from another eligible voter. Transportation is laughable at best - the city had over 120 polls open to the public and voter mobility was at it's highest. Regarding computer/tv access - it's required under the Vancouver charter for public notice to still be given via print media.

      There isn't a Republican conspiracy going on in Vancouver.

      Maybe I should have articulated my original point better but the reality is there is no point crying over spilt milk, if these advocates wanted to make a difference then should be more focused on the education of the voter and mobilizing the marginalized to get out and vote.

      Martin Dunphy

      Jan 22, 2015 at 1:37pm

      Khang:

      Those 120 polls you mention were not available for the advance polling that the city trumpeted. No one should ever have to "bum a ride" to the polls if they need to cast an advance vote. End of story.
      And if you think I'm the only one who thinks this, take a look at the ratings below the first two comments.

      Tommy Khang

      Jan 22, 2015 at 3:48pm

      @Martin

      Honestly I am not surprised the amount of downvotes I get when commenting on the alternative media site known as the Georgia Straight. I hold views that differ greatly from the majority of readers and still stand by my original and follow-up comment. There are multiple options for voting other than by advance poll and a mail-in ballot would be amenable option to most.

      Furthermore do you not agree that voter education and mobilization of voters would be more effective then attempting to complain about the system after the fact? I mean if you still believe in a Republican conspiracy then you clearly must be aware of that these two points are part of the Democrats arsenal.