9/11 Truthers' event follows tribunal victory
For 9/11 truth seekers across the continent, all roads lead to Vancouver in June. That's when the city will host a three-day gathering of activists who question the American government's account of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the U.S.
Darren Pearson, an organizer of the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Society, is thrilled. That's because the event follows on the heels of a symbolic decision rendered on May 11 of this year by an international people's tribunal sponsored by the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War, a private organization founded by former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. A panel of judges issued a verdict declaring ex–U.S. president George W. Bush and seven members of his administration, including former vice president Dick Cheney and ex–defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld, guilty of torture and war crimes in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
“That's big news in my world,” Pearson told the Straight in a phone interview. “That's a great achievement, even though we know that nobody went to jail yet. It's a long ways from that. But that's still an important step.”
American lawyer Alfred Webre, who was a judge in the Kuala Lumpur proceedings, is coming to Vancouver for the event. Webre will help evaluate information presented by speakers at the so-called Vancouver Hearings, which will be held at Denman Cinemas June 15 to 17.





Open Invitation to the 9/11 Truth Community,
Join us at The Vancouver Hearings
The Denman Theatre
15-17 June 2012
OUR MISSION: TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF 9/11 TRUTH
http://www.911vancouverhearings.com
One indisputable fact: there is no possible way the airplane they say hit the pentagon made a hole significantly smaller than the body of the airplane. It is just not possible. Even if the plan had no wings on impact, the hole should have been twice as big. That alone is more than proof enough that they are lying, so what else are they lying about?
forensic evidence-void, caveman -kamakazzi OFFICIAL 9/11 theory....
There are thousands of:political, intelligence, military insiders; international MPs, U.S. senators/congressmen, architects and engineers, scholars, firefighters, scientists etc...
see: www.patriotsquestion911.org
All it takes is for one seemingly minor detail around the narrative to be true, am I right? Can someone tell me: what is the single most compelling, irrefutable detail the 9/11 truth movement has to offer? Where is the smoking pistol? One would think that with all the theorizing and debunking that's gone on over the past 12 yeas, at least one thing would emerge that does not lend itself to opinion or debate. Some of the most eye-popping things in "Loose Change" have been essentially disproven, but I'd bet some stubborn fact still remains.
James "the driver shot Kennedy" Fetzer is a fraud and a charlatan and I am disgusted he is invited to Vancouver to use our city as a platform to spew his disinformation.
Guys like him are the greatest threat to 9/11 Truth and are responsible for putting the subject of 9/11 into the kook cabinet which in turn makes sites like Avaaz not even touch the subject.
If anyone is interested in REAL 9/11 information I would checkout a film on VIMEO called '9/11 and the Cover Up' by Ryan Dawson.
http://vimeo.com/39578648
The film is filled with new information that you've probably never seen yet including who had access to the elevator shafts for the entire month before 9/11 and the film names actual perpetrators instead of "NWO" or "Illuminati" etc..
Hands down the best film on 9/11 period.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
What lunacy.
I have to agree that building 7 is indeed the most compelling aspect that I've seen (though I've not exactly made a study of any of this). I do know that many people feel that the way the twin towers collapsed raises suspicions, but for a 3rd tower to go down the same way, the same day? Well, it does strain credulity doesn't it?
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/WTC_Not_A_Demolition
Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth has already shown that the NIST Report was a transparent cover-up. They have a new documentary: "9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out,Final Edition"
http://www.ae911truth.org
I don't know whether high energy weapons were also used that day too, but something burnt up cars and tires and left plastic upholstery intact, while untouched papers littered the same street.
It should be an interesting conference.
How about this one from a slightly different angle. If you compare the two angles, you DON'T see what appears to be a sequenced column of demolition charges going off?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&feature=fvwp
It is an interesting exercise to calculate mathematical probabilities of so-called “conspiracy theories”. The mainstream media and their cadre of online gatekeepers use the term “Conspiracy Theorist” (CT) as a derogatory label for those who seek the truth. According to the media, there are never conspiracies. But they avoid factual discussions based on the scientific evidence.
These myths are promoted non-stop in the mainstream media.
- Oswald acted alone in 1963 – with a magic bullet and defective rifle.
- Bush won Florida in 2000 and had a 3 million “mandate” in 2004.
- Nineteen Muslims armed with box cutters who could not fly a Cessna, hijacked four airliners and outfoxed the entire U.S. defense establishment – while Bin Laden was on dialysis, near death and hiding in caves.
But the media can’t refute the mathematics that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a massive conspiracy to hide the truth of these events from the public.
9-11 was a false flag to go to war in the Middle East with the intent of making BILLIONS and TRILLIONS from the various wars. It's all about the money, folks.
I could type all day but if an adult hasn't figured out that something fishy is going on, then they are a lost cause and the dumbing down of the sheeple is complete.
Pages