9/11 Truthers' event follows tribunal victory

For 9/11 truth seekers across the continent, all roads lead to Vancouver in June. That's when the city will host a three-day gathering of activists who question the American government's account of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the U.S.

Darren Pearson, an organizer of the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Society, is thrilled. That's because the event follows on the heels of a symbolic decision rendered on May 11 of this year by an international people's tribunal sponsored by the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War, a private organization founded by former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. A panel of judges issued a verdict declaring ex–U.S. president George W. Bush and seven members of his administration, including former vice president Dick Cheney and ex–defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld, guilty of torture and war crimes in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“That's big news in my world,” Pearson told the Straight in a phone interview. “That's a great achievement, even though we know that nobody went to jail yet. It's a long ways from that. But that's still an important step.”

American lawyer Alfred Webre, who was a judge in the Kuala Lumpur proceedings, is coming to Vancouver for the event. Webre will help evaluate information presented by speakers at the so-called Vancouver Hearings, which will be held at Denman Cinemas June 15 to 17.

Comments (32) Add New Comment
Darren Pearson

Open Invitation to the 9/11 Truth Community,
Join us at The Vancouver Hearings

The Denman Theatre
15-17 June 2012

OUR MISSION: TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF 9/11 TRUTH

http://www.911vancouverhearings.com
6
6
Rating: 0
RealityCheck
Koo-Koo bananas!
1
5
Rating: -4
jonny .
Anyone who knows anything about 9/11 knows the US is lying. It is physically impossible for their story to be true. I am not saying I think the US government is responsible, but it is a fact that they are lying at least about some things.

One indisputable fact: there is no possible way the airplane they say hit the pentagon made a hole significantly smaller than the body of the airplane. It is just not possible. Even if the plan had no wings on impact, the hole should have been twice as big. That alone is more than proof enough that they are lying, so what else are they lying about?
5
2
Rating: +3
Georgina La Hue
Another important step in the long road to a recognized International Criminal Court.
3
4
Rating: -1
RME
It's not just activists who question the patently absurd, physics defying,
forensic evidence-void, caveman -kamakazzi OFFICIAL 9/11 theory....

There are thousands of:political, intelligence, military insiders; international MPs, U.S. senators/congressmen, architects and engineers, scholars, firefighters, scientists etc...

see: www.patriotsquestion911.org
3
2
Rating: +1
out at night
I think it's too bad that so much of the 9/11 debate is around the singular topic of the collapse of the towers. I've long been under the impression that here are some other points that are much harder to argue against than the controlled demo theory.

All it takes is for one seemingly minor detail around the narrative to be true, am I right? Can someone tell me: what is the single most compelling, irrefutable detail the 9/11 truth movement has to offer? Where is the smoking pistol? One would think that with all the theorizing and debunking that's gone on over the past 12 yeas, at least one thing would emerge that does not lend itself to opinion or debate. Some of the most eye-popping things in "Loose Change" have been essentially disproven, but I'd bet some stubborn fact still remains.
3
1
Rating: +2
TheParadigmShift
The so called "Vancouver Hearings" is nothing more than a disinfo fest pushing easily discredited theories regarding 9/11 like "spacebeams took down the towers" and "TV Fakery nonsense claiming there were no planes used on 9/11" etc...

James "the driver shot Kennedy" Fetzer is a fraud and a charlatan and I am disgusted he is invited to Vancouver to use our city as a platform to spew his disinformation.

Guys like him are the greatest threat to 9/11 Truth and are responsible for putting the subject of 9/11 into the kook cabinet which in turn makes sites like Avaaz not even touch the subject.

If anyone is interested in REAL 9/11 information I would checkout a film on VIMEO called '9/11 and the Cover Up' by Ryan Dawson.


http://vimeo.com/39578648

The film is filled with new information that you've probably never seen yet including who had access to the elevator shafts for the entire month before 9/11 and the film names actual perpetrators instead of "NWO" or "Illuminati" etc..

Hands down the best film on 9/11 period.
7
5
Rating: +2
Dave19
A bearded man in a cave hooked up to a kidney machine penetrated the most heavily defended airspace in the world and with a cell phone,laptop and 19 young amateurs took down 3 sky scrapers with only 2 airplanes, collapsing them straight down at free fall speed.






3
2
Rating: +1
Geoffrey Holland
Look for sales of aluminum foil to skyrocket during the conference! What a bunch of morons.
3
4
Rating: -1
Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov
3
3
Rating: 0
Etvlan
Sadly, you cannot wake up a country that is pretending to sleep.
1
2
Rating: -1
doubletalk
Regretfully I will be out of town during the "conference"..Too bad, I needed a big laugh. And nothing makes me laugh like a bunch of delusional nitwits.
1
2
Rating: -1
Albury Smith
Perhaps Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov or someone else here could tell us how Box Boy got 6.5 or 6.6 seconds for the entire WTC 7 facade collapse from videos like the one he posted. Most of us can't see the lower part of the building from any of them, and the NIST engineers were only able to time the top ~242'. That portion of the collapse took ~5.4 seconds, so did the other ~368' fall in 1.1 or 1.2 seconds? It's stupid enough to attach significance to collapse times, but at least get them right, not off by ~2 seconds and with a 1/10-second accuracy that's impossible to achieve.
What lunacy.
2
5
Rating: -3
out at night
Thanks Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov

I have to agree that building 7 is indeed the most compelling aspect that I've seen (though I've not exactly made a study of any of this). I do know that many people feel that the way the twin towers collapsed raises suspicions, but for a 3rd tower to go down the same way, the same day? Well, it does strain credulity doesn't it?

2
0
Rating: +2
Albury Smith
WTC 7's collapse initiated around the 13th floor, and the towers both collapsed from their impact areas on the ~81st and ~96th floors respectively, so they hardly went down the same way. If any of these collapses "raises suspicions," read NCSTAR 1 and 1A and watch the videos. There were no explosions immediately prior to or during any of the collapses, no demolition explosives were ever heard [see link below], no explosively-severed steel was found in the debris, and there's not even a plausible motive for these allegedly planned demolitions. Would the US have just sent al Qaeda a warning letter if no WTC building had collapsed on 9/11?
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/WTC_Not_A_Demolition
2
3
Rating: -1
Judy Cross
While I am uneasy about James Fetzer, the fact remains the official explanation is as much a joke as the Magic Bullet that killed Kennedy.
Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth has already shown that the NIST Report was a transparent cover-up. They have a new documentary: "9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out,Final Edition"
http://www.ae911truth.org
I don't know whether high energy weapons were also used that day too, but something burnt up cars and tires and left plastic upholstery intact, while untouched papers littered the same street.
It should be an interesting conference.
3
0
Rating: +3
HellSlayerAndy
Hey Albury Smith

How about this one from a slightly different angle. If you compare the two angles, you DON'T see what appears to be a sequenced column of demolition charges going off?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&feature=fvwp
2
2
Rating: 0
Richard Charnin
http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/conspiracy-theories-and-m...

It is an interesting exercise to calculate mathematical probabilities of so-called “conspiracy theories”. The mainstream media and their cadre of online gatekeepers use the term “Conspiracy Theorist” (CT) as a derogatory label for those who seek the truth. According to the media, there are never conspiracies. But they avoid factual discussions based on the scientific evidence.

These myths are promoted non-stop in the mainstream media.
- Oswald acted alone in 1963 – with a magic bullet and defective rifle.
- Bush won Florida in 2000 and had a 3 million “mandate” in 2004.
- Nineteen Muslims armed with box cutters who could not fly a Cessna, hijacked four airliners and outfoxed the entire U.S. defense establishment – while Bin Laden was on dialysis, near death and hiding in caves.

But the media can’t refute the mathematics that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a massive conspiracy to hide the truth of these events from the public.
3
1
Rating: +2
moondogg
Some people wonder why the US government would do the 9-11 crimes. They say there is no reason for any of that to happen. Here's the answer in one character... $

9-11 was a false flag to go to war in the Middle East with the intent of making BILLIONS and TRILLIONS from the various wars. It's all about the money, folks.

I could type all day but if an adult hasn't figured out that something fishy is going on, then they are a lost cause and the dumbing down of the sheeple is complete.
2
2
Rating: 0
A. MacInnis
I wonder if the entire 9/11 truth movement, from the outset, had put their entire energies into putting Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and so forth on trial for the war crimes we KNOW they perpetrated, instead of concocting theories about evils that they MIGHT have had a hand in, if they'd all be in jail by now...? No matter what compelling tidbits I see suggesting that there's more going on than the official version allows - and there are some of those out there, I'll grant you - 9/11 truth seems *mostly* a misguided sideshow put on by people with weak egos who get off on calling the folks around them "sheeple." I mean, it's a better hobby than, say, Holocaust Denial, say, or raving against the New World Order, but given that the Bush regime remains unpunished for what we KNOW they did - invading Iraq under false pretences, endorsing torture, rendering innocent civilians, building a concentration camp off the coast, and working to demolish the sanctity of human rights worldwide, all which should be enough to have them all in prison, if there were justice in America, or if Obama had any courage at all - why does anyone bother foaming and ranting about what they MIGHT have done? Deal with the reality first - there's lots of time for fantasy and speculation once they're behind bars.
1
1
Rating: 0

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.