Art of Loving's oral sex seminar subject to censorship

Comments

The co-owner of a Kitsilano erotic boutique has been told he can’t advertise an educational seminar about oral sex on a website because of the “sensitivity” of the subject. John Ince, a partner in the Art of Loving, told the Georgia Straight by phone that the founder and CEO of SocialShopper, Ehsan Baloochy, “unilaterally” terminated a contract between the store and the site.

Ince maintained that the decision occurred despite his willingness to change the name of the class from Giving Good Head to something along the lines of Spice Up Your Sex Life, Orally Speaking.

“We couldn’t get a coherent explanation.…It’s just another example of what I would regard as censorship of sexual discourse,” he said.

The class is being taught by Vera Zyla, a partner in the store. Ince said that by not running the ad, Baloochy is “preventing a healthy dialogue about sex” and perpetuating “negative attitudes”.

“And those negative attitudes, we know, are unhealthy,” Ince stated. “So the policy is socially unhealthy.”

Baloochy did not respond to a call from the Straight by deadline.

After he was notified that the contract was being terminated, there was a lengthy email exchange in which Ince argued his case first to SocialShopper staff member Michele Colbertt and later to Baloochy. Ince said that to Baloochy’s credit, he engaged in dialogue about the issue.

“Our firm did not knock on Ehsan’s door,” Ince wrote in one message to Colbertt. “His firm knocked on ours. That started a long process that involved extensive email and phone consultations which resulted in a formal contract between our firms. As small business owners we think contracts mean something. We think honourable business people, especially those interested in win-win-win solutions, do everything in their power to honour their agreements.”

In one email, Baloochy wrote to offer “apologies in advance if there were any misunderstandings”. In a subsequent message, he characterized the issue as a “unique situation”.

Ince responded in an email that the media, including the “advertising media”, have played an important role in helping society overcome racism, sexism, and homophobia. He said this was accomplished “in part by including racial minorities, women and homosexuals in media content”.

In addition, he noted, the media help “overcome unhealthy attitudes to sex by normalizing healthy discussions about sex”. He argued that the decision not to carry advertising for a seminar about oral sex ultimately “harms the public interest”.

“The issue is sex censorship,” Ince told the Straight.

This isn’t the first time the Art of Loving has been blocked from advertising. Ince said that several years ago, the store was not permitted to put its logo alongside a quote from famed playwright William Shakespeare in a Bard on the Beach program. “We pointed out that Shakespeare is filled with bawdy language,” he recalled.


Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.

Comments (13) Add New Comment
You
Fun little store with great a staff. Too bad people are such prudes.
2
6
Rating: -4
prenup
still amazes me that sex is more taboo then violence. One is a natural biological function needed to sustain the human race, while the other is about hurting and in extreme cases mass destruction of humans yet advertising movies with the worst imaginable violence is ok, but sex is not.

How American of us...
1
0
Rating: +1
zen_sensual
Im sure if i owned a Gun shop and approached Social Shopper for a 50% off agreement sale they would have said NOoooooo Problemo! The stigma is still so prevalent with things related to safe and consensual sex in our society and this is sad and yet another example of it. I will NOT support company's with this attitude.
0
2
Rating: -2
Mike Hunt
just goes to show there's no such thing as bad press.
this article cuts a much wider swath than whatever it is mr. baloochy owns.
6
2
Rating: +4
Wow.
Mr.Baloochy NEEDS more sex. He obviously hasn't seen the last few pages of our beloved Georgia Straight.
2
1
Rating: +1
Mike Rotch
@ Mike Hunt
Nice name
1
2
Rating: -1
cuz
It seems to me that if SocialShopper is a private business they have the right to decide what they want on their website. Just like other websites like the Straight. You guys are a bunch of hypocrites!!! Not advertising the oral sex workshop doesn't "harm the public interest" nearly as much as being told what you can or can't do with your own business. Oops, seems like both parties in this dispute are arguing the same thing.
1
2
Rating: -1
PleaseWhatever
Umm... is Vera single?
1
2
Rating: -1
Mark Fornataro
Lenny Bruce(see link below) talking of censorship, religion, sex etc said 'information makes the country strong'- or in this case the individual. Bruce was talking during his Berkley gig from probably about 45 years ago. Those who still think this kind of censorship is fine are way behind the times.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq6sAO9vACY
1
3
Rating: -2
zen_sensual
this goes to the message from "CUZ" that company pulled out (pardon the wording)after the Art of Loving store spent hours and dollars preparing to have an add with them . Thats just bad biz practice as well as just poor judgement for the reason. So yes they have the right to decide what goes on their web and i hope the public people will decide not to do biz with them for that reason.
2
2
Rating: 0
positive_future
"Art of Loving"can hold seminars and advertise them , i.e. "run their business" in any way they deem fit. And so can "Social shopper". Business with their customers is the ultimate decisive factor, if they survive in the market or not. If anything, this is a contract question between the two parties and not a question of censorship. A publisher/owner has the right to accept or reject any advertiser in his publication. Would "The Straight" not reserve the right the reject an ad for a gun dealer, or a potentially racist seminar?
0
1
Rating: -1
Joseph L.
Is this a joke??? Art of Loving is complaining that SocialShopper decided not to advertise them!? They have every right to make that decision and if they changed their mind so what? That is legally allowed in most contracts as long as it's mentioned in terms and conditions. I've seen it happen many times legally. I think Georgia Straight should focus on more interesting stories in my honest and humble opinion, plus they don't know the full facts from SocialShopper side so this is technically a one sides story.
Take it with grain of salt people!
1
0
Rating: +1
Martin Dunphy
Joseph L.:

Thank you for your comment, but do you really think the Georgia Straight should not print what you term "a one-sided story" simply because the other side in the story either failed to return a call or refused to comment?

If media outlets followed your advice, how easy it would be, then, for anyone having their feet held to the heat to ensure the story won't be told by simply ducking out of sight.

The writer did his due diligence without stating an opinion one way or another. SocialShopper had its opportunity to give its side and failed to do so, for whatever reason. This much was made clear in the piece.

I fail to see your point, except that you are not interested in the story. What most people do then is turn the page, so to speak.
1
4
Rating: -3
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.