B.C. privacy commissioner critical of smart meter program

Comments

The province’s privacy watchdog says B.C. Hydro has not been providing customers with adequate notification about its smart meter installation project.

In a new report, information and privacy commissioner Elizabeth Denham finds the Crown corporation has failed to fully comply with the B.C. Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

“B.C. Hydro is required by law to tell their customers the purpose for collecting personal information for the smart meters project, what legal authority they have to do so and to provide contact information for a B.C. Hydro employee who can answer any questions that arise regarding collection,” Denham said in a statement.

“Hydro is not currently meeting this requirement, and we've made some recommendations to help them improve their customer notification,” Denham said.

In her report released today (December 19), the privacy commissioner recommends B.C. Hydro address the problem by providing customers with better information online and in print.

Denham launched a review of the smart meter program following an outcry from British Columbians concerned about privacy and security.

In July, B.C. Hydro started replacing older meters with digital smart meters as part of an effort to modernize its electricity network. The Crown corporation says the upgrades will allow for improved measurement of how power is used by homes and businesses.

With the new technology, B.C. Hydro can track power consumption on an hourly basis instead of on a bi-monthly or monthly basis.

In her report, Denham also found B.C. Hydro has complied with provincial privacy law regarding how the information about energy consumption is being collected, used, and protected.

“It is clear from my investigation that B.C. Hydro is taking privacy and security seriously as it develops a framework for the implementation of smart meters and a smart grid. But there are areas for improvement,” Denham said.

According to Denham, B.C. Hydro has pledged to take steps to address all 14 recommendations her report.

Comments (13) Add New Comment
Lawson1945
Im totally against the "smart meter " program, what we need is the firing of senior management, but Richard Coleman as usual has no guts, a terrible minister at best and most useless!
0
0
Rating: 0
Johnny Canuck
I'm totally FOR the smart meter program and the expectation that it will be an integral part of energy conservation - and lead to further efforts at conservation of other resources. Several BC cities are also getting water smart meters too. I have no concerns about electricity smart meter safety and I find the BC Hydro Smart Metering Business Case to be persuasive, especially because more recently, there has been independent analysis of the amount of electricity theft and the researchers found that the BC Hydro estimate of such theft was actually conservative. That said, I don't necessarily disagree with the findings of the privacy commissioner that BC Hydro will now do more to inform customers of the privacy and confidentiality issues around smart meters. However, after reading her OIPC report on the smart meter program, I'm surprised that she did not seek to compare the invasion of privacy by the current human meter readers who come on to our private property to read meters, versus the wireless smart meters. I'm also skeptical she has not yet done an analysis of the huge amount of privacy invasion by corporate "loyalty" cards in BC, wherein companies selling food, gasoline, etc know when and where and how much you bought using their cards. To me, this is actually more worrisome than the BC Hydro (a crown corp) smart meter privacy concerns.
0
0
Rating: 0
Smoochy
Agreed.

Can't recall ever agreeing with you before Lawson, proving there's a first time for everything.

0
0
Rating: 0
cochran
My cabin on the Gulf Islands had the old meter replaced, in this early spring, while i was not present, with the new "smart" meter. The meter at my residence in Surrey has not been replaced, yet. Comparing last year's hydro bill, at my cabin, with the latest bill, i find that for the same usage period of a year earlier,and being that the year earlier was a colder period, the current bill is $3.00 higher than last year. And that is with the fridge disconnected this time around. So, go figure!
0
0
Rating: 0
ds
There is a report on Ontario Hydro and their smart meters which stated they are unsure if they are working in the way they were intended. There for is it worth the expense? A grand case of jumping before you look.
0
0
Rating: 0
Second Nation
yawn
0
0
Rating: 0
Randy Stuppard
I'm against the program as well - not just for security and privacy but the health aspect as well. Read this...

On May 31, 2011 The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) as a (group) 2B carcinogen. This decision mirrors the IARC ‘s 2001 finding where extremely low frequency (electrical power lines and appliances) is classified as a 2B Carcinogen and put it in the same category as substances such as lead, styrene and the pesticide DDT.
0
0
Rating: 0
seth
Actually Canuck, if you take a look at Hydro's smart meter study it uses the outrageous assumption that grow op power thefts cost it the 12.6 cents a kwh, it is paying the Campelloni's stockbroker pals for their private power.

If you use the 3 cents a kwh average daytime and free nighttime power, BCHydro can download from the Columbia grid - its real incremental cost - or even what Hydro charges residential users, the marginally economic smart meter program becomes decidedly financially negative.

Grid level meters at about 1% the cost of the program would have been sufficient to stop grow op thefts.

The entire Smart meter economic study is a shameful example of deterministic engineering economics, where the hapless engineer is required by management to manipulate inputs until the desired result emerges.
seth
0
0
Rating: 0
What's the problem?
To Randy Stuppard,
You're worried about privacy but you have a facebook account that gives out more information to the general public (me - just did it, know where you work!) than Hydro cares to get from your smart meter. As well, if you're concerned about EMFs, how about thinking about your home gadgets including wireless internet, bluetooth, cell phones, etc etc. It's funny that people's arguments only apply to the smart meters, but not to everything else in our lives which invade our privacy and expose us to harmful EMFs. Interesting.
0
0
Rating: 0
Kim Goldberg
It's unfortunate that Denham was not able to grasp the full sweep of the Orwellian privacy and surveillance implications of BC Hydro's smart meter program. However as of yesterday, a citizens' group (Citizens for Safe Technology) is seeking an injunctive freeze on further smart meter installation from the BC Utilities Commission (the agency that should have approved this program in the first place but was deliberately bypassed). Details here: http://pigsquash.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/injunction-sought-against-smar... . If you are lucky enough to still have an old analogue meter on your home, this would be an excellent time to barricade it. Some barricade photos here: http://pigsquash.wordpress.com/2011/11/13/how-to-lock-down-your-meter-ph... . When the injunction is granted (as many of us hope and expect it will be), the 'winners' will be those who managed to hang on to their analogue meters.
0
0
Rating: 0
glen p robbins
I agree with Ms. Denham. What is necessary imo is to ensure that laws or regulations are put in place - that provide huge penalties against BC Hydro in the future where there is evidence that information has been taken from use in a home and applied to another circumstance for which it is not intended which is a breach of personal privacy. If there is provision (and this is BC I can guarantee you there isn't) for fines and penalties to be paid to the person against whom the offence is made - then the lawyers will be doing something constructive for society and be placed in a situation where they can work for a client who has been harmed (with an expectation of being paid - otherwise good luck).

These fines and penalties must be constructed with a reverse onus on Hydro ie Hydro must prove they did not inappropriately use the information. Where is David Eby and his band of Civil Libertarians on this issue? - let the new Independent police appointee get in place and try this on for size.
0
0
Rating: 0
GasparIlom
To what's the problem? Your point of people having other devices that transmit EMF's is valid however, they are optional, you can choose to have them at your home or not, SMART meters are NOT optional. They are being shoved down our throats by BC Hydro, and there is nothing we can do about it. Maybe a referendum like we did to defeat the HST can do the job.
0
0
Rating: 0
StopSmartMeters.ca
GasparIlom: the referendum isn't a maybe. It will happen. Pre-register here to stop smart meters in BC:

http://StopSmartMeters.ca
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.