The big chill of ocean warming

As ocean temperatures rise and the water becomes more acidic, everything from shellfish to real estate is at risk of eradication.
Comments

“I have very bad news for you. Are you man enough to take it?”

“God, no!” screamed Yossarian. “I’ll go right to pieces.”

—Joseph Heller, Catch-22

In 2001, Ian Walker, a 40-year-old associate professor of geography at the University of Victoria, began walking the desolate, kelp-strewn beach south of Rose Spit, the northeasternmost tip of Haida Gwaii. And each year that followed, he returned. An expert in coastal erosion, he’d look at 1990s Geological Survey of Canada air photos of the place and look at the modern shoreline bluffs and feel amazed.

In places, 30 metres of land had disappeared in a year. Could it be connected, he asked himself, to anecdotal reports from local Haida that North Pacific storms were getting worse? Or that the sea level was rising? The latest predictions were a rise of one to two metres this century. If these things were so, what did it mean for the more than 300,000 people who live below sea level and behind dikes in Richmond and Delta?

The news gets worse.

In 2010, Rob Saunders, long-time CEO of Qualicum Bay’s Island Scallops, set out 12 billion young scallop larvae to be nourished in the Strait of Georgia near Nanaimo. But as the weeks passed, 99.95 percent of them died. “It was catastrophic!” he says today. He suspected a biological cause: a toxin or disease. But chemical testing revealed that the ocean was far more acidic—and far more saline—than ever recorded. It was the water itself that was lethal.

Up and down the coast, others in the $38-million-a-year B.C. shellfish industry were seeing the same thing. Saunders didn’t fully appreciate then that ocean acidity is increasing exponentially worldwide. Or that this acidity most affects the sea’s smallest creatures—larvae, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and krill—the very animals that sustain the entire marine food chain.

The news gets worse.

The story you are about to hear is complex, and has mostly been submerged by the discussion about atmospheric carbon dioxide and global warming. It has only been in the past few years that scientists have begun to grasp how the world’s dramatically warming and acidifying oceans—covering four-fifths of the planet—may have far more influence on the near future than previously understood. Virtually all local marine scientists say the latest data reveals something ominous happening. But the forces are many, the data thin. And research funding is limited. The metaphor I hear most frequently from experts is the proverbial “elephant in the room” image: something so big, so hard to measure, and so unpredictable that it’s difficult to discern the outcome.

What, for example, does it mean for this region if—as scientists now report—the glaciers of B.C.’s Coast Mountains are melting at a faster rate than anytime since the end of the ice age 12,000 years ago? That in itself is cataclysmic. But how will this affect migrating, cold-water-loving B.C. salmon? Or the bears and eagles that depend on those salmon? Or the province’s 442 coastal eelgrass estuaries that act as nurseries for many fish? Or increased marine salinity and acidification caused, in part, by decreased freshwater runoff? Or B.C. fishers who depend on the sea’s bounty?

These are the kinds of questions that Victoria’s Walker spends his time considering. He’s the lead author for the B.C. chapter of From Impacts to Adaptation: Canada and the Changing Climate, a massive 2007 federal report that was buried by the then newly installed Harper government. Working with 30 other B.C. scientists, Walker tried to see the Big Picture. He tells me on the phone that at the current accelerating rate, the air temperature on the B.C. coast, already 2 ° C warmer in the past few decades, will likely rise 5 ° C more this century.

It will not only be warmer here, there will be eight percent more rain and a lot less snow. As a result, it’s expected that 97 percent of the current coastal alpine habitat will vanish before 2100. This will be good for subarctic firs, which will, as the tree line ascends, gradually occupy today’s alpine meadows. It will be bad for the wildflowers and the marmots and snowmelt. In fact, current projections say Coast Mountain glaciers will be entirely gone by the century’s end. And rivers like the Fraser, already also 2 ° C warmer than a few decades ago, not only will be warmer (and lower) in the decades ahead as runoff slows in late summer but may well become increasingly inhospitable to autumn’s annual salmon migration. And once this diminishing supply of fresh water reaches the B.C. coast, the cascade of consequences, experts say, only multiplies.

Barring a great subduction earthquake off the west coast of Vancouver Island, there are three forces that will most affect maritime B.C. in the coming decades. First, every scientist tells me that advancing ocean warming will reshuffle the deck as to which creatures remain here, which ones succumb, and which ones—like the marine mammals—simply retreat north to colder Alaskan waters. Second, sea-level rise will have a negligible effect on the province’s mostly rocky coastline but will have—in time—a calamitous effect on B.C.’s low-lying deltas and coastal estuaries, with their rich wildlife habitats, their farmlands, their industrial infrastructure, their port facilities, and their urban populations.

It is, however, the third force—ocean acidification—that experts suspect may be the trump card, both globally and locally, in humankind’s precarious future.

The details of atmospheric warming caused by the burning of carbon-rich fossil fuels are too familiar to reiterate. What’s less well known is this: since the start of the Industrial Revolution around 1760, more than 30 percent of all atmospheric CO2 has—in a complex chemical reaction—been absorbed by the world’s oceans. This is a huge benefit for the air. But this interaction alters the ocean’s pH, turning surface waters acidic. That’s because CO2 plus water equals carbonic acid. In fact, since 1760, ocean acidity worldwide has risen 30 percent. This toxicity becomes even more extreme—as Qualicum Bay shellfish farmer Saunders recently learned—in enclosed waters like those of B.C.’s archipelago-lined straits.

(This past summer, in a curious, related footnote, scientists announced they’d finally resolved the mystery of the great Permian-Triassic extinction of 251 million years ago, the single most catastrophic event in the planet’s history. The cause? Atmospheric CO2—probably the result of massive Siberian volcanic activity—produced ocean acidification so toxic that 96 percent of the planet’s marine species went extinct.)

Pages

Comments (19) Add New Comment
Oceanguy
While this long story may or may not prove true, the pacific ocean near the equator has been cooler than normal due to La Nina. Too bad these researchers didn't bother leaving BC to study world ocean climates.
3
3
Rating: 0
Paul Rideout
Since we have not made any real effort to reduce our consumption of fossil fuels or to stop spewing carbon into our atmosphere, it strikes me that the ecological cataclysm that is predicted in this artile is inevitable. We are so addicted to the big oil machine that we are unable to shut it down. Because of this failure to act we face a future that scares us and when a society is fearful of the future, instead of hopeful, bad things happen. I believe it is this fear that is driving the orgy of greed and the rapid increase in inequality that we are seeing and that thousands, the world over, are protesting. The thinking, perhaps subconsciously, goes like this.."There are bad times coming and to hell with democracy and peace and all that crap, I have to accumulate as much as I can, as fast as I can so that MY progeny have a slightly better chance at surviving the coming environmental breakdown." I think that is why we are living in an age of greed.
2
0
Rating: +2
NoLeftNutter
What a bed-wetting load of crap;. Most of the "scientific claims" in this artcile can't be verified. Air temperature increasing? The GISSTemp record says otherwise. Ocean Acidification? The ocean is still in an alkyd state. Ocean warming? The Argo buioy system says otherwise. As much as we have a repsonsiblity to keep our environment clean the addition of CO2 to the atmosphere is not driving cataclysmic climate change and stupid scare stories like this serve no useful purpose.
1
3
Rating: -2
RickW
Oceanguy:
La Nina is periodic. The warming ocean is long-term. There is a difference.

NLN:
Get a life!
RickW
4
0
Rating: +4
Judy Cross
CO2 is as much plant food in the ocean as it is on land and the pH varies according to how close to shore, what time of day, sunny or cloudy and season to season. Organisms like occolithofores gobble it up as fast as they can get it and sequester it, so do shellfish and yes, starfish.
This is just more pathologizing of the perfectly normal. Problem/reaction and the solution is more taxation? Oh, yeah!
2
3
Rating: -1
RickW
1
1
Rating: 0
B ready
Aqua-culture currently monitors Ph/alkalinity to improve larval success for onshore tank culture of oyster. Success means money and to the many doubters out there the people who need to pay attention are paying close attention.
3
2
Rating: +1
Educated
NoLeftNut: I see your extensive research in climatology and marine biology has taught you a lot.
1
1
Rating: 0
Steven L. Jones
The phytoplankton produce 50% of the planets oxygen. If things get so bad that they can make their shells and die, walking on sea level will be like trying to climb Mt. Everest.
1
3
Rating: -2
Anton
I ran into two fairly prominent marine biologists down south from the University of Oregon who were conducting, or rather preparing to conduct, experiments to test for the presence of deep ocean acidification and warming. To their knowledge they were the first to do so (perhaps only pertaining to that depth though?). I have yet to read the report, if it's been published yet.

I'm always interested to ask, why are people so angry about this happening exactly?

2
2
Rating: 0
Martin Dunphy
Anton:

Quite possibly because it could lead to the end of life on Earth.

Have a nice day.
0
0
Rating: 0
Roy Mulder
I attended the International Marine Conservation Congress in Victoria a few months ago. There was no doubt amongst the 1,200 marine biologists attending that global warming and ocean acidification is real. The challenge lies in a society that spends little time researching the ocean and the creatures in it. By the time the research is done, it is usually too late. We are not spending enough time on research or protection. Less than .5% of BC's coast is fully protected. It is one ocean that covers the majority of our planet and we treat it like a sewer and waste dump. It's where life started and may well be where the end is.
0
0
Rating: 0
Save Vancouver
The sky is falling brigade seems to have missed this nugget in the article:

".(This past summer, in a curious, related footnote, scientists announced they’d finally resolved the mystery of the great Permian-Triassic extinction of 251 million years ago, the single most catastrophic event in the planet’s history. The cause? Atmospheric CO2—probably the result of massive Siberian volcanic activity."

So in other words, this has been happening since time immemorial, and nobody really knows how much of the current situation is manmade. And even if you all trade your cars in for Vespas, a couple good volcanic eruptions, and it will all have been for nought.
0
0
Rating: 0
Paul Rideout
It's a finite planet with a finite capacity. An economic system premised on endless growth is collective suicide. We seem to live in an era in which few people care about the future. The new spirtuality of "me" and "now" is killing us.
1
1
Rating: 0
Paul Rideout
Save....In any given year the CO2 contributed to the earth's atmosphere by volcanic activity is tiny compared to how much we spew out. Try to picture every fossil fuel burning engine on the planet in one place and you may be able to picture the effect that this 24/7/365 man-made "eruption" is having.
1
0
Rating: +1
RickW
The average internal combustion engine, after over 100 years of this technology, has achieved the stunning rate of 20% efficiency. Even doubling this rate would be something positive (for those who cannot imagine weaning themselves off the IC engine). So why do we persist in tinkering around the edges, and allowing nearly 80% of the gasoline get wasted?
RickW
2
0
Rating: +2
B ready
Some of us need to entertain living zero ( fossil fuel ) carbon lives. We collectively may be doing enormous damage yet only individually can we challenge our fate.
0
0
Rating: 0
UBC Student
NoLeftNutter, I am writing an essay about the facts behind climate change science and ocean acidification. Most scientific source that I have read so far goes against the claims you have made, but I'm interested in getting a broader view. Could you please share with me some of the sources that you are citing?
0
0
Rating: 0
George Orwell II
NoLeftNutter is a Harperite neo-Con who stalks all such comments boards ready and eager to attack, malign, and confuse in order to deflect concern away from real problems threatening the world. Clearly, the human family tree is in dire need of some drastic pruning.
1
0
Rating: +1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.