Bus bunching on major routes calls for new approach from TransLink
By Michael Henricksen, Sarah Glover, Jason Shi, and Nick Zhu
With the announcement of further price increases across the board for transportation in Vancouver, it is time for the cash-strapped TransLink to improve its operating efficiency rather than throwing money at a problem that is suffering from a severe case of diminishing returns.
One issue that often irritates passengers in Vancouver is a phenomenon known academically as bus bunching. It describes a situation where one bus is delayed to the point where the next bus of the same route catches up to it. This results in the delayed bus picking up the bulk of the passengers at each stop, passengers who have been expecting to catch that bus at its earlier scheduled time, while the second bus behind it runs the rest of the route under-capacity with almost non-existent headway (distance to the bus in front).
There are many different ways to improve headway and TransLink’s current solution, slacking, attempts to achieve this by forcing bus drivers to stick to a strict schedule so that they leave and hopefully arrive on time. Because there are outside factors such as traffic conditions and varying passenger loads, bus companies will actually reduce service (slack) in their schedules. This means that buses running ahead of time wait at control points—usually on major intersections—until their scheduled departure time. Not only is this evidently not working, some studies have shown that this approach can actually be worse than having irregular headways between buses as it slows down the speed of how fast passengers move.
We prefer a more dynamic, common-sense approach. On high-frequency routes, such as the 99 B-Line and those that feed into Southwest Marine Drive on their way to UBC, we advocate for the abolishment of the bus schedule. Instead, buses should wait until the distance between buses has been shortened. Further, the driver of the delayed bus should advise boarding passengers that the next bus is near and to take that instead, allowing it to catch up to where it should be and also making peoples experience on the bus more comfortable since they are not packed with passengers. This may sound crazy but studies have shown that this approach to transit gets more people moving faster, despite seemingly having to wait more.
Passengers will need to be notified of this new approach and drivers will need to make fair judgments and work collectively, but with both the required communication and GPS equipment already available on buses and real-time scheduling available through the website and the SMS system (as well as electronic signs at some stops), TransLink is all but ready to be an innovator in transit.
Michael Henricksen, Sarah Glover, Jason Shi, and Nick Zhu are University of British Columbia students who are studying economics. They live in Vancouver.






Unfortunately any improvement of the system is obviously not within the mandate of Translink. The system is engineered by design to be slow, overcrowded, unreliable and generally crappy.
According to Elections BC, The New Car Dealers Association of BC generously contributed $822,314.00 to the BC Liberals between 2007/02/20 and 2010/02/05 alone.
We are looking at millions of dollars overall. That would explain for example, why the GRVD has by far, the most expensive fares in Canada with the ripoff 90 minute fare zone system.
Bad transit however, is the most wonderful incentive to sell cars. If you have a job, you have access to credit. You can buy a car and go deeper into debt.
Yet another reason not to vote for the BC Liberals...
http://lailayuile.com/100-reasons-the-bc-liberals-must-go/
Heck, interest rate are low so come on down to XYZ Auto Mall and the good folks there can put you into something that will depreciate 20% the first minute you drive off the lot and eighty percent after five years.
Looks like Translink is anything but ready to be an innovator in transit.
Here's what happen to transit in LA. Ever wondered why it sucks?
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/551/did-general-motors-destroy-...
The leapfrogging that sometimes happens, where a mostly empty bus passes the full one and absorbs the load, can't occur on trolley routes. In that case multiple routes can be delayed by one bus. I happen to like trolley buses, but they aren't as flexible as the diesel ones.
Regarding buses waiting at timing points I really don't mind. I'm going to get to my destination when I planned to get there so why worry? I'd rather spend an extra 3 minutes sitting on the bus than 3 minutes waiting in the rain.
They do not address the many real major issues with Translink.
Like gross mismanagement and mismanagement of the budget.
For example overpaying for Buses, if you pay a competitive rate to buy Buses you can have more Buses & Drivers thus reducing the congestion significantly.
Translink by best estimate I can see from their Financial Statements pay about $540,000++ to about $1 Million per Bus (depending on the type).
A competitive bid process could easily reduce this cost by at least 50%.
Spending...
* $171++ Million on unnecessary Fare Gates with an R.O.I (Return On Investment) of 10+ Years is ridiculous.
Than right after that expenditure to claim that your out of money and need to raise Fares by 10% is a RIPOFF of the BC Public.
With Tolls + Highway per KM charges like California to "raise revenues" aka another user (everyone) Tax whether you use Transit or not on top of your...
+ Hydro Bill for Translink Revenues
+ Increased Fares
+ Tolls & per KM Charges
This simply is giving a blank check to Translink to waste even more money without much accountability.
We need to change the model & management of Translinkto see real results instead of band aid solutions.
The same thing that happened in LA happened in Vancouver and all over North America. GM handed out free buses (once) and Firestone put free tires (once) on them for any city that ripped up the streetcar tracks and converted to diesel buses. It was supposedly the patriotic thing to do, putting the returning veterans of WW2 to work in the auto and tire factories, while providing a guaranteed long term income stream for the auto, tire, and oil companies.
Miguel