COPE angles for Vision seats in Vancouver by-elections

Comments

Paul Houle is suggesting that Vision Vancouver not field candidates if the city holds byelections.

Houle said that Vision is in a position to make a nice gesture toward his party, the Coalition of Progressive Electors, by leaving the latter to hold open nominations. It should also support whomever is chosen by COPE, he added.

The long-time COPE member and former party executive was responding to questions about possible upcoming by-elections for council and park board. Vision councillor Geoff Meggs and Vision park board commissioner Constance Barnes are currently seeking nominations to represent the B.C. NDP in next year’s provincial balloting.

In recent years, COPE and Vision have cooperated electorally. In 2011, Meggs, Barnes, and the rest of Vision’s candidates won, while COPE was wiped out except for one seat on the school board.

“Given that Vision has a majority of seats in council and COPE is shut out, I think it would be fair for Vision to support COPE running a candidate in any vacancy and leaving it as a free nomination where COPE members decide who will be their candidate,” Houle told the Straight in a phone interview.

Houle stressed that he doesn’t want his party’s candidates to be seen as having been “handpicked by Vision”.

“If it comes to a situation where it’s perceived that Vision is kind of like a puppeteer pulling the strings within COPE and choosing a COPE candidate that’s perceived as very aligned with Vision, to me that would not be in the interest of COPE,” he said.

Vision managing director Stepan Vdovine said that his party would be “interested in having conversations with the COPE executive when the time comes”. But he stressed that it’s “quite premature to comment”.

“It’s so far [away,] and the possibility of by-elections seems quite remote at this point,” Vdovine told the Straight by phone.

COPE executive member David Chudnovsky laid out what the party will do if Meggs and Barnes give up their seats. “The executive would get together and either make a decision or make a recommendation for the membership,” Chudnovsky told the Straight in a phone interview.

Comments (6) Add New Comment
hmm
The headline reads: "COPE angles for Vision seats..."

Does Paul Houle speak for COPE now?
0
1
Rating: -1
Original Prankster
Would Vision even win against COPE?
0
0
Rating: 0
chowza
Vision deserves to lose a seat in a byelection but not to COPE. Ideally, to an independent to show we don't need or want political parties at City Council
But please, we do not need Tim Louis or one of his clones!
0
3
Rating: -3
james green
I am tempted to be that independent. What say you chowza?
1
0
Rating: +1
Thomas Diaz
Ha! This is the same guy who was freaking out about backroom deals and cooperating with Vision...and now he's grovelling for them to sit this one out? That's rich.

If the Paul Houle's and Tim Louis' of the world are now in charge of COPE, then let them see how this city feels about their ideas for Vancouver. Run in a by-election with anyone and everyone else. Let's see how much money you can raise, how many volunteers you can get, and at the end of the day, how many votes you win.

You wanted to go it alone, so go it alone.
0
1
Rating: -1
Diaz is right
Diaz is right, COPE should cut all connection to those hopeless liberals in Vision. Vision has given developers as free rein as they could possibly have hoped for, meanwhile cloaking their pro-corporate politics in silly ultra-lite enviro platitudes (recycling, bicycling and chicken coops).
0
2
Rating: -2
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.