COPE releases Vancouver civic election platform

Comments

The Coalition of Progressive Electors released their full election platform today (November 8), which includes plans for a city housing authority, inclusionary zoning, and a tiered business taxation system.

"If Vancouver is to live up to its reputation, we need everyone, from artists, to small business owners, to seniors, to students and new families, to be able to reach their full potential," said city council candidate RJ Aquino as he outlined the party's platform.

Aquino said COPEs wants a housing authority to oversee the creation of more affordable housing in the city. The independent commission, as proposed by COPE, would also ensure inclusionary zoning laws are applied to all new developments, and support non-profit developers to build and sell new units at the cost of construction.

The COPE platform also includes commitments to: create 1,000 affordable rental units in Vancouver every year; to launch an “affordability crisis commission” to determine the extent of the city’s housing crisis; to propose the creation of Neighbourhood Planning Councils; to look at creating community transit passes, and to advocate for electoral reform and changes to elections spending.

COPE’s platform on schools includes pledges to work to ensure seismic upgrading and proper building maintenance, and to advocate for smaller class sizes, support for children with special needs, and more English as a second language instruction.

The party’s park board policies include plans to oppose fee increases of services that are above the rate of inflation, unless the services are used to encourage more sustainable options, and to call for more public washrooms.

Aquino said the platform hasn’t been endorsed or approved by Vision Vancouver, but noted that COPE and Vision will be “working together” through their common slate.

“It’s our job to make sure that our voices are heard,” Aquino told reporters. “This platform has been voted on and approved by our membership, and it is an ambitious program, but we have to take bold steps in order to make bold changes to the city, and I’m sure our colleagues at council will see that and we’ll do our best to demonstrate the positive changes that we’re outlining here.”

As part of an electoral agreement with Vision Vancouver, COPE is running three candidates for city council, two for the park board, and four for the school board.

At COPE’s news conference at SFU Harbour Centre today, Aquino was also asked about COPE’s stance on the city seeking an injunction to clear tents from the Occupy Vancouver protest site at the Vancouver Art Gallery.

“COPE supports peaceful protest, and we need to make sure the message is heard,” he said.

“What we do support is dealing with this without a heavy hand – making sure that everyone’s concerns are addressed, that everything is peaceful and that the protest and the message continues to be heard.”

Comments (11) Add New Comment
james green
Damn, specifics, specitics, specifics. Please all candidates release a paper that tells how you will do what you claim will fix things. How, the costs, the impact on taxes, the timeline, the man and lady hours it will take to implement your platform, the team needed to implement your platform, and more, needs to be put forward for real scrutiny.
Anyone can say we will or we need to. Cope, Vision, NPA, NSV and the others who want to run this city must table a business plan including an implementation plan to all voters and then we can make a decision. Otherwise, those who get elected will spent time blindly involved in busineyness without any quantitative results or outcomes. Voters must demand more of candidates than talk and empty statements.
2
2
Rating: 0
Lawson1945
I do not have a problem with their " affordable housing" program and reason they want more esl, is because the federal government is bringing actual verbal testing of "English" language skills to be used in the general public.
2
2
Rating: 0
xp
what about youth, workers, women, art and culture?
seems to be nothing.
1
2
Rating: -1
GZLFB
A good report would line it up with the triangle relationship COPE is in with Vision-NPA and NSV. I am not sure about non-profit only, but rental zoning is not crazy. Usually condos were made for mortgages that lead to Government bailouts anyway. Can't even say that isn't social(ist) housing. I agree the state can do the best thing by not being a land lord, I am not sure about opening more quangos and self regulated government bodies that are labeled "independent" because there is no direct link city council. Eventually it be another useless board like parks and school. Be nice to have less direct touch on education period and usher in vouchers opening choice so there is a boost to private school markets of all kinds. Competition makes things better in most cases.
1
1
Rating: 0
Lawson1945
We do not want anything for arts and culture but for sport only, for culture it must canadian culture only where the money comes from!
2
2
Rating: 0
Foggy
COPE said they stood in solidarity with Occupy Vancouver. How many of the 60 roughed out demands of OV do they actually support? Do they support:

25. We demand an independent investigation into 9/11 which will examine all evidence including that which would support a false-flag explanation.

27. We demand - as Bertrand Russell suggested - there be two police forces – one to prove your guilt and another to prove your innocence.
1
2
Rating: -1
janebouey
2
1
Rating: +1
james green
Ms. Bouey. I read the crap at http://cope.bc.ca.2011/11/08....
Cope's platform is full of a bunch of statements that lack depth like all other parties. Have none of you people written a business plan before. with revenue, expense, profit/loss statements, cash flow projections for three years, risk analysis and risk management strategies? How about a milestone schdedule for your action plan and implementation strategies?
How about a market analysis and staff needs and mangement program. How about the impact on the tax base and tax payers?
A specific business plan that lays out what, how, why and when you will do the things you promise in a professional business is needed and voters should expect nothing less.
It is time for COPE, the NPA and Vision and NSV and others running to stop approaching governing this city like amateurs and get down to platform based on sound business principles.
I am sick and tired of watching this type of platform, devoid of the above, being passed off as anything other than a series of promises without a well developed business plan.

At this stage none of you amatuers deserves to get elected.
It is time for all parties to show they have a business plan for the three years thery plan to be in power at city hall.
In summary, COPE's platform like the rest of the parties does not hit the mark and should be rewritten.
Voters much demand more than promises.
1
1
Rating: 0
Bodacious
A vote for COPE is a vote for Vision Vancouver. Call me next election when you find your balls and run a fully independent slate.
2
2
Rating: 0
james green
Sorry, but anyone who disagrees with what I wrote does not have the interests of the citizens of this city in mind. We all need to demand this information from all candidates.
1
2
Rating: -1
GZLFB
James, that is fine for Government insiders like the parties in power. I can say what I can about my beliefs and philosophy, but still have to admit what ever mess I see, I am sure it will be worse when I see it for myself. Being an outsider. We need more outsiders, it may be nice to have someone see what isn't transparent and be outraged enough to do something, even better. The other side is, expecting career politicians and career politician organizations aren't likely to give specifics, since platforms are based on simplified point systems devised by campaign management. It may have worked better if they left individual Candidates to write up their own personal philosophy. If it differs from party basic tenants then point out that they might be in the wrong place. There is a bigger issue, not just policy, how much you trust them, are they conscientious? Even tough?
0
1
Rating: -1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.