Dams in Metro Vancouver watersheds could generate electricity

Comments

Metro Vancouver is poised to dive into hydropower generation in the Capilano and Seymour watersheds.

City of North Vancouver mayor Darrell Mussatto promises that when it does, the region’s two main drinking-water sources will remain publicly managed and off-limits to private interests.

“There’s no plan for us to privatize this water-energy production at all,” Mussatto told the Straight in a phone interview. “This is something that Metro Vancouver is taking on our own initiative.”

Mussatto and other members of the board of the Greater Vancouver Water District will vote Friday (November 30) on a staff recommendation to adopt a new water-use plan for the Capilano and Seymour watersheds. Staff also propose that the plan and water-licence applications for the hydropower projects be submitted to the provincial comptroller of water rights.

“We want to make an application before the provincial government by the end of December,” Mussatto said.

Capilano and Seymour supply 70 percent of the region’s drinking water; the Coquitlam watershed provides the rest.

According to Mussatto, power produced at Capilano and Seymour would be sold to B.C. Hydro. The mayor stressed that the two projects would generate “green electricity” from the spill water from existing dams.

The water-use plan prepared by Metro staff indicates that the planned Capilano power plant has an expected output of 30 to 70 gigawatt hours per year. If the same amount of power was produced using fossil fuels, this would create greenhouse-gas emissions of up to 1,200 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually.

The Seymour plant is expected to generate five to 10 gigawatt hours each year. Using fossil fuels to generate this electricity would produce greenhouse-gas emissions of up to 225 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually.

“Drinking water will not in any way be compromised,” Mussatto said.

Mary Johnston is apprehensive private power companies may dip their toes into Capilano and Seymour in the future. “As soon as you start having other interests who have a hand in how that water gets used, I’m concerned,” Johnston—who owns Water Matters, a water-quality-products company based in Vancouver—told the Straight by phone.

Comments (3) Add New Comment
Bored
wrong. get rid of all dams. not needed. read tesla's books and you won't even bother wasting a loonie on dams
1
5
Rating: -4
Jon Petrie
Above: "the planned Capilano power plant has an expected output of 30 to 70 gigawatt hours per year. If the same amount of power was produced using fossil fuels, this would create greenhouse-gas emissions of up to 1,200 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually."

But per a Sept 6 Globe and Mail article "375 tonnes of CO2 per gigawatt hour" is optimistic (low) for a natural gas fired plant. 70 gigawatt hours times 375 tonnes comes to 26,000 or so tonnes of carbon dioxide, signicantly higher than the "up to 1,200 tonnes". What am I missing ?

Globe article: http://m.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and....


2
2
Rating: 0
dW412195
Metro Vancouver’s long-term plan anticipates that the region’s population will grow by a million people over the next 30 years.

While there may be “excess” water pouring over the spillways of our water reservoirs today, will there by spare water for this growing population?

Climate warming is predicted to bring the Lower Mainland wetter winters and drier summers. Do the water reservoirs have enough capacity to meet the needs of 3 million people through long dry summers?

Will the proposed electric power plants give an adequate return-on-investment if their periods of operation or level of output are constrained by ‘drought’?

2
1
Rating: +1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.