Daniel Veniez: Bob Rae deserves a chance to run for leadership of Liberal Party of Canada

Comments

By Daniel Veniez

This week's echo-chamber conversation among political and media insiders is about whether the Liberal Party executive will clarify rules, which may allow interim leader Bob Rae to run for the permanent job, should he choose to.

Some have written in sanctimonious and self-righteous terms about Rae's "duplicity" and his self-evident intention, they say, to "break" a promise that he made not to run for the permanent job. I find this selective talk by Liberals of the horror of broken promises rather amusing.

Liberals have a long track record in the promises that truly matter to voters. And they are exhausted by Liberal hypocrisy and the nauseating culture of entitlement. So to clear the air a little bit, let's talk about some recent history of Liberal "promises" that are really at the core of why we are now a third-place party, shall we?

That paragon of civil liberties and human rights, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, imposed the draconian War Measures Act that authorized the imprisonment of anyone without charge or due process. Trudeau ran an entire election campaign against wage and price controls, won the election against Robert Stanfield, and then promptly imposed wage and price controls. He promised a National Energy Program that would benefit the entire country, but instead ended up sucking the life out of the Alberta economy.

While Chrétien and Martin Liberals position themselves as the founders of fiscal rectitude, Liberals fiercely opposed any and all attempts at fiscal responsibility in the Mulroney years.

Chrétien never ran on cleaning up Canada's balance sheet. But that is what happened, and Liberals only did so because they had to. The Wall Street Journal's editorial calling our dollar the "northern Peso" was one of many wake-up calls that they could no longer ignore.

Liberals also furiously opposed the Free Trade Agreement, the GST, privatization, and the Meech Lake Accord. Once in power, Liberals embraced all of Mulroney's fiscal and economic policies and became a quiet but aggressive champion of asymmetrical federalism.

And of course who could forget that the party that went to the wall to defend the "Trudeau vision" of opposing recognizing Quebec as a "distinct society" enthusiastically embraced a House of Commons motion that recognized Quebec as a "nation"?

While Liberals are quick to criticize Stephen Harper for his approach to health care, he did in fact increase and secure long-term funding. By contrast, Chrétien-Martin slashed transfers to the provinces unilaterally and without notice.

Before Harper, Chretien's PMO was the most centralized and controlling in Canadian history. The previous Trudeau government started it all. The Young Liberal "reform" movement of 1982 reflected a desire to inject more accountability in the party and was a response to how Trudeau's small inner circle ran and controlled everything. Sound familiar?

While Chrétien proposed to "clean up" government in the wake of some Mulroney-era "scandals," he presided over one of the most sleazy episodes in Canadian political history—the sponsorship scandal.

The Chrétien-Martin governments were cheerleaders for important environmental protection initiatives and signatories to the Kyoto Accord. And then Liberals literally did nothing for years to implement the commitment they signed on behalf of all Canadians.

After Jean Chrétien lost the leadership to John Turner, he almost immediately worked to undermine—rather than support—Turner during what was until then the most difficult period for any Liberal leader.

Paul Martin, the man who lost the leadership to Chrétien, spent his entire ministerial career positioning himself to succeed his boss. When Martin got tired of waiting, he actively organized a coup against his own leader, a sitting prime minister of Canada and someone who had led the Liberal party to victory on three successive occasions.

The Chrétien-Martin war was a political cancer of the most malignant kind. Opposing sides took no prisoners. They didn't care about the party or the country. The motivation was self-interest, not Canada. Martin may have won, but he and his people destroyed what was left of the party in the process.

The capacity of the Liberal party to blow itself up knows no bounds. Today, this rump party is at risk of ripping itself to shreds one last time. This time it is not about policy or where we see Canada in the 21st century. It is about—you guessed it—leadership.

Rather than calling on all qualified comers to join the debate on the future of Liberalism, some are urging one of the most qualified, experienced and talented political leaders of our age—Bob Rae—to disqualify himself from the race.

These people are talking about this as if being the leader of the Liberal party is the most coveted job in Canada. It's not.

Ideally the field will be full of good people, among them current and former caucus members, defeated and future candidates. Unfortunately, we shall see none of the stature of Rae, whom I very much hope will run.

Justin Trudeau is a genuine Canadian and political celebrity. It's a shame that he has chosen not to run. He would be an extremely formidable contender and liven up the race in many ways.

I would also love to see Frank McKenna, Brian Tobin, and John Manley run. I would love to see Jacques Menard, a brilliant business leader, run. Or former Quebec premier Daniel Johnson.

There are many outstanding people out there, but they will not run. Why would they?

It has yet to sink in to for some Liberals that the leadership is a poisoned chalice and the brand is profoundly damaged and must be substantively redefined. That is not the job for an amateur or for the inexperienced.

The organization has been deeply neglected by Trudeau and Chrétien and is in a state of dire disrepair. Canadians have tuned out, not because of Rae, but because of all of us. We have been deluding ourselves by not turning the page and focusing on forward looking and thinking content.

We desperately need our best and brightest, including Rae, to step up and run for the leadership of the party. We need a meaningful conversation about Canada's future and the relevance of our place within it.

Daniel Veniez is a former federal Liberal candidate in West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country. Reach him on Twitter at @danveniez.

Comments (23) Add New Comment
Katherine Mercier
Wow! Talk about telling it like it is! How refreshing. Either Veniez feels freedom from nor planning to ever run agin, or he plans to as a new breed of politician we need in Canada. Either way, the truth shall set you free!
2
2
Rating: 0
Donald Freeman
Mr. Véniez is right. Why would the Libs want every possible candidate they could get, especially good ones, like Bob Rae. It certainly helped the NDP and could do the same to he Libs. If not, they can join us.
2
2
Rating: 0
Sean
I like the way this guy writes. No B.S. and he makes a very important point. Liberals should stop committing suicide and concentrate on providing the alternative that Canadian democracy needs.
1
1
Rating: 0
Marc Jonas
I have no idea whether Rae is the answer or not. I do know that the Liberals needs all the help they can get and can do a lot worse than him as leader.
1
1
Rating: 0
Jody
I think the Liberals are dead, just like the BC Liberals are. They stand for nothing, except holding on to power.
2
2
Rating: 0
Frances
Mr. Veniez, why don't you run. You are the only breath of fresh air in that dead party!
1
1
Rating: 0
Alexandra
Veniez - you're killing me! Rae? Really? If that is the best you guys can offer, welcome to 24 Sussex Mulcair.
2
2
Rating: 0
Brian Smith
The Liberal hypocrisy is well stated by the writer, who should know a thing or two about the topic. He is absolutely right on the money in his pointing out that Liberals have a long history of doing what they have to for the sole purpose of clinging to power. The problem is that the country really needs a moderate centrist party and they are the only game in town. They will have to change and mature as Veniezvery correctly implies if they have even a sliver of a chance of returning to power one of these days. Veniez is also right to suggest that they would be nuts not to allow Rae to run. He may very well lose, but telling him he can't even run is stupid. Besides, how many people did Ignatieff run against at his coronation? At least Rae wants a race.
15
1
Rating: +14
Elizabeth Johns
Indeed Mr. Vienez. Bob Rae should run and we know he is capable and willing to do the work required. Why does his interim leadership role give him an advantage. Does Justin Trudeaus name not give him an advantage and does not Marc Garneaus heroic astronaut status not give him an advantage and what about David MacGuintys powerful brother, seems like an advantage to me. Raes interim leadership just catches him up to these contenders and goes a ways toward burnishing a tarnished reputation as Ont NDP premier. Go Bob Go.
1
2
Rating: -1
Tim Dalliday
People in the party are always ready for internal bickering. We have to kill this party and come back as something else. I don't know how the infighting will ever stop. Guys like Rob Silver, Scott Reid, and Warren Kinsella, don't let the door hit your butts on the way out.
1
2
Rating: -1
hollinm
Well at least one Liberal gets it. However, once again he is in denial and wants to dismiss the commitment made by Rae and the party when Rae took on the interim leaders title. That was not to run for the permanent leadership. Another broken promise. His running will cause others to bow out of the race as it will be perceived the fix is in. Yes Rae has many qualities but he is yesterday's man. He has a disastrous record as Premier of Ontario and older Ontarians have not forgotten. He is of the old school politics talking about strategy, tactics, processes instead of substance and policies. Finally he has done little to improve the party or the fortunes of the party in the eyes of Canadians. That in itself should disqualify him. That fact there are no real contenders should have nothing to do with whether Rae runs or not. He said he wouldn't and that is how it should be.
1
0
Rating: +1
Brian Smith
Hockim, the point is not whether Rae should run or not, the point is who will be the next leader. If people want re, they'll vote for him. But they should be free to make that choice.
1
0
Rating: +1
My Opinion
Typical Liberal. Let's do whatever it takes, damn the rules, to win. And you accuse the Cons of killing democracy. Hmmm.
0
1
Rating: -1
Brenda
What are you talking about, "My Opunion"? Rae has not said he would run. He said that he would abide by the rules the party has set. If that's what you call a "typical liberal", then I like what I see.
0
1
Rating: -1
Ed B
Just what we need, he can screw up the whole country like he did Ontario......hey that should put our economy in sync with the failing U.S.A.
The Liberals are nothing more than a bunch of socialists in disguise who will do anything to grab power and cling to it. They would kiss a goats ass if it got them a vote. This country has had enough after years of them ruining the country and the constitution.
0
1
Rating: -1
HellSlayerAndy
1) The headline is wrong. Rae HAD a chance to run the Liberals already and with his great political acumen, he deferred to Iggy?

Harper will be in power for decades if the Opposition simply consists of insiders like the former NDP Premier of Ontario and the former Liberal Cabinet minister (whose leader was a former Mulroney Conservative Cabinet minister who became a Quebec Liberal).

2) the Liberals aren't a 'rump' party. Often misused term. Rump refers to what is leftover AFTER a formal break up of a party. It's not an election term -- it can be applied to any party in a minority position after a split. The PC were a rump party when Reform emerged.

3) "I would also love to see Frank McKenna, Brian Tobin, and John Manley run."
Like it states....Daniel Veniez is a former federal Liberal candidate in WEST VANCOUVER–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country and so he essentially dreams about the glory days of austerity in 90s as opposed to austerity of the 21st century. He likes Conservatives, but he thinks the current ones have too many Bible thumpers and so he's a Liberal.

1
0
Rating: +1
Brenda
I think you're right, Veniez doesn't like bible thumpers. He also doesn't like abuses of democracy, lying politicians, incompetent government, mindless parroting of party lines, superficial talking point MP's, fanatical market economics, intolerant extremes. And if you look at his writings and time as a candidate, he also has little time for socialist dogma, class warfare, and unchecked state interventionism. Yep, that makes him a Liberal, not a conservative. Nice, but entirely bogus and stupid try there, Hellraiser. Why don't you try again?
0
1
Rating: -1
Aaron B
Bob Rae is not known for keeping his word. Why would he start with his promise about not staying on as the Lie-bral leader?
1
1
Rating: 0
River341
If Bob Rae is the answer for the Liberals, then they lack imagination and the party is done. NDP are gaining ground.
Would love to see Justin Trudeau run but he probably understands that now is not a good time.
1
1
Rating: 0
Frank Viau
This is one of the most honest column's I have rad from anyone active in the political process in a very long time. It is also quite evidently a sincere cri de coeur from someone who has invested much in this party and wants to see it succeed, despite itself. Although an admirable plea or Liberals to get their act together and stop the self absorbed delusion, Mr. Veniez is barking up the wrong tree. Grits are dead. Their party is a sick and dying institution that is in the last throws of a culture that is premised on power. I'll never forget Jean Chretien saying that being a Liberal is a great thing because you can stand for anything you want. Sick and sickening. Too bad, though, that people like Veniez will have no place to go when they merge with the NDP like Chretien wants. He won't be alone. There are lots of us in the same boat. Chretien and Martin have done a great disservice to Canada.
1
1
Rating: 0

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.