David Suzuki: Black Out Speak Out rallies for the environment and democracy

Comments

Canada would be a different place without our 80,000 registered charities dedicated to everything from health to economic policy to the environment. We’d be much poorer without the two-million employees and millions of volunteers who devote their time to causes that strengthen our nation.

Recent efforts by the federal government and its backers in media and industry front groups like Ethical Oil to demonize and silence legitimate organizations ignore the important role charities play in Canada. That’s why environmental and other organizations are joining with Canadians from all walks of life for Black Out Speak Out, launched on May 7 with ads in the Globe and Mail, La Presse, and Ottawa’s Hill Times and culminating in a website blackout June 4.

Canadians understand the value of charitable organizations. Close to 85 percent of us over 15 years of age (22.2 million people) donate to charities every year. Often, it’s to help people in other parts of the world. According to Charity Village, Canadians gave $20 million to the Canadian Red Cross, CARE Canada, Oxfam Canada, UNICEF Canada, and World Vision within four days of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. For supporting worthy causes, Canadians are entitled to a small tax break.

Canadians also know that our spectacular natural environment is crucial to our national identity, health, and survival, and that we can’t always count on governments and industry to look out for its interests. And so they give their time, money, and voices to organizations working on a range of conservation issues from habitat and species protection to clean energy and global warming. The David Suzuki Foundation relies on Canadians for close to 94 percent of its funding.

Canadians also expect transparency and results, which is why our funding and spending information is public. With the help of many Canadians, and along with friends and allies, we’ve enjoyed many successes. We’ve increased demand and supply for sustainable seafood, fought for habitat protection for animals such as killer whales, and ensured that invaluable areas like the Great Bear Rainforest and the northern boreal forest get increased protection. Perhaps more importantly, we’ve facilitated opportunities for Canadians to engage in important discussions about conservation of the air, water, land, and biodiversity on which we all depend.

It’s why we’re astounded by the increasing efforts to stifle so many people and organizations that devote countless hours to the often thankless and less-than-lucrative tasks of ensuring that Canada remains a stellar example of an open and democratic country with strong social values and a clean and healthy environment.

If we are committed to these ideals then it follows we should also value freedom of speech and opportunities for a range of viewpoints on matters of national interest. It’s fair to place limits on the extent and types of work organizations with charitable status can do. It’s fair to ask questions about donations and what, if any, influence they may have on activities. But it is unacceptable to try to silence people with smear tactics designed to discredit them and deny their funding.

If our leaders want to pin all their hopes and our future on a twinned pipeline through Alberta and B.C. to ship raw tar sands bitumen to China, then Canadians at least deserve a proper conversation about it. We’ve seen recent signs of hope, with the Alberta government calling for a national energy strategy, for example, and with people in the media and elsewhere questioning the wisdom of employing an omnibus budget act to gut environmental laws and attack charitable organizations.

With continued suppression of those who speak out about the environment and women’s and human rights, along with muzzling of government scientists and cuts to government scientific and environmental programs and departments, it’s clear we’re facing a growing campaign, in part backed by industrial interests, to silence opposition.

We expect and deserve better. That’s why we’re speaking out. Silence is not an option. We’re asking all Canadians to join us to help preserve two core national values: nature and democracy. Let’s keep Canada strong and free. Please visit the websites of your favourite environmental organizations on June 4 to add your voice.

Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation editorial and communications specialist Ian Hanington. Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

Comments (10) Add New Comment
IT SHOWS THE CONTRARY
It shows how important these groups are to the environment and how important it is to these groups who gave their time and heart to make this country a better place to live. It is unfortunate the people of Canada cannot say the same for their federal government who is only to quick to denounce everyday people as radicals and the climate and the environment as an imposition to business therefore deny, deny they even exist and now neither do their supporters as Harper sets the stage for climate change and environmental destruction all because Harper wants to move mountains and waters and streams to push the tar sands through and flatten the global market. The Finance Minister has always been Flathead to me but I'm changing that to Fathead as he pushes environmental destruction like you would a used car. You'll get better mileage if you let it ride a tsunami.
0
0
Rating: 0
Brian Waddington
Freedom and wilderness are strongly connected. They are connected because both require people to think in ways that scares the bejesus out of the people who try to control us.

Both freedom and wilderness require responsibility from the individual. And if we are responsible for our actions then those who would control us loose!
0
3
Rating: -3
blueheron
As usual, David Suzuki, the man with the BIG carbon footprint, shows his blatant hypocrisy. Canadians have been inundated with requests for funds to support charities, to the extent that many people are now turned off by the constant TV, print and mail ads asking for donations. Those who disagree with his views, such as Ethical Oil, are smeared by Suzuki and his ilk. A campaign was launched to try to keep SunTV off the air, so opinions that don't jibe with the global warming hysteria would not be broadcast. The Suzuki type appears to be comfortable only when one view is represented...His own view. The lemming left view.

Al Gore and David Suzuki are spin meisters, and they always benefit personally.

0
2
Rating: -2
lawson45
Remove the carbon tax from gasoline and terminate the carbon tax fund which is going to some Liberals pockets.
0
0
Rating: 0
teacher
Brian...it's 'lose'...not 'loose'
You do know they mean two different things...?!
A great post and then it comes crashing down because of bad spelling.
0
0
Rating: 0
RK
I absolutely do not want my tax dollars supporting a charity like the horribly misnamed ForestEthics, whose idea of charity work is to carry out economic blackmail campaigns against companies and harass these companies into signing up with the Forest Stewardship Council. It is absolutely appalling that these two organizations, both of which have charitable status, have been allowed to get away with this kind of activity for years. (And yes, I am aware that the misnamed ForestEthics has recently stated it is splitting its charitable activities from its political activities. Time will tell if that's the case.)

It's about time that Revenue Canada scrutinized the activities of environmental groups. If they meet the definition of a charity and pass muster with Revenue Canada, then what is David Suzuki in a snit about?
7
0
Rating: +7
Bill Ellis
I just had a look at the BlackoutSpeakout website just set up by a coalition of people like David Suzuki. "The second reason they give for asking us to support is this: "The government is adding $8 million in new funding for the Canada Revenue Agency to audit charities ~ including environmental groups ~ because they use their legal right to advocate for things things like global warming."

That is classic George Orwellian misspeak. The government is doing this because environmental groups especially, are abusing their legal right to do this by spending far more than they are allowed to under existing rules. to engage in "political activities" One such donation to Greenpeace was for the specific purpose "to create enough financial, regularity and political uncertainty that prominent financial analysts will publicly state their concerns about investments in the tar sands". (National Post, May 8th)

That statement, like many others, have now been removed from these "charitable" organizations' web-sites. And for me David Suzuki's immediate resignation from his Foundation right after the government's
announcement re the audits speaks volumes.
0
0
Rating: 0
The Orb
Suzuki's been saying "we've only got 10 years to fix the earth" for almost 3 decades now. Now he's running away from having to answer for his actions. He's nothing more than a cowardly charlatan
0
0
Rating: 0
lawson45
I basically do not support any of David Suzuki's ideas and rants, but he has made millions out of this.
0
1
Rating: -1
blueheron
This reminds me of U2's Bono, collector of millions of dollars from the gullible, to help counteract AIDS in Africa. Research revealed that only 1 % of those funds went to legitimate charity.

"Bono, the frontman of rock-band U2, has come under fire after it was revealed by the New York Post that his anti-poverty foundation, 'One', gives only one per-cent of its funds to charity. The non-profit organisation was set up to by the 50-year old, and received almost 15 million in donations in 2008, however, the newspaper reports that only 190,000 of that figure was donated to good causes. "

http://www.contactmusic.com/news/bonos-foundation-gives-only-one-percent...

Time to wake up and smell the fair trade coffee.
0
7
Rating: -7
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.