David Suzuki: Salmon farming may be a good idea after all
It would be a shame if we could never eat salmon again. On the Pacific Coast, salmon has been an important food source and a cultural icon throughout history. Salmon is a healthy, delicious, and versatile source of nutrition. But many wild salmon populations are in trouble and could be facing the same fate as East Coast cod stocks.
Is the answer to raise salmon on farms? The controversy over farmed versus wild salmon has been ongoing in B.C. since the first salmon farms were built in the early 1980s. A growing body of evidence has shown that fish farms that use open-net pens in the ocean can harm wild stocks. Some of the dangers include escaped farmed fish—which are mostly Atlantic salmon—competing with the five species of wild Pacific salmon, pollution from the farms harming the areas where salmon live and migrate, and lice infestations threatening the very survival of some stocks. It’s a trade-off that doesn’t make much sense.
It would be ideal if we could move these farms and protect our wild stocks to ensure they provide us with food well into the future. But wild salmon face many other threats, including overfishing, habitat loss, and climate change, and we don’t yet understand all the factors contributing to their decline.
Farming may be our only option—and new technology offers some hope that we can continue to have our salmon and eat it too. Raising salmon in a way that eliminates interaction with the environments where wild salmon live has long been suggested as a way to overcome the worst effects of farming fish. Despite resistance from some people in the fish-farming industry and government, who argue that contained farming is too expensive, closed-containment salmon farming is becoming a reality.
Early attempts at salmon farming that keeps the farmed fish separate from the wild environment were mostly experimental or too small to be commercially viable. But now a Washington State company, Domsea Farms, is raising sufficient quantities of coho salmon for Canadian grocery chain Overwaitea Food Group to offer the company’s SweetSpring salmon in its 124 stores in Western Canada. The salmon are raised inland in tanks with freshwater, leading to a ranking by SeaChoice and Seafood Watch as a consumer “best choice”. (Overwaitea has committed with SeaChoice to a long-term plan to eventually offer only sustainable seafood in its stores, and this is a great step.)
The technology is still new, though, and farming salmon, no matter how it is done, comes with challenges. One of the biggest is that salmon is a carnivorous fish—it requires other marine resources as feed. In this case, the fish are given feed that includes ingredients made from plants and fish-processing byproducts, thus reducing the need to use other fish species. Recent research has also looked at using insects in fish feed.
Inland fish farms must also discharge used water, but water from these operations is treated to comply with environmental regulations. Recirculation systems are also being developed to reduce the amount of effluent from the fish farms.
The other issues include disease control and energy consumption. The most serious disease-related issues appear to have been addressed at the Domsea farm, in part by using clean water and constantly monitoring the fish, as well as ensuring that disease has no way of spreading to wild populations.
These systems can also use a lot of energy. But this is an easier problem to address than the many problems associated with open-net farms. Improvements in technology have helped make the closed farms more energy-efficient, and increased reliance on clean-energy sources will further reduce the environmental impact.
The industry still has a way to go before it can create a large supply of fresh salmon, but the fact that retailers are getting on board will help spur consumer demand and make the industry more viable. If this helps to resolve the problems associated with ocean-based salmon farming while taking the pressure off wild stocks and ensuring that people still have access to this great food, we’ll all benefit.
Maybe the big question is, “How does it taste?” Robert Clark of Vancouver’s C Restaurant, which offers inland farmed coho from B.C.’s Swift Aquaculture on its menu, says that, like Atlantic farmed salmon, it has a somewhat lighter, less fishy taste than wild salmon.
Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.




At one time the David Suzuki Foundation used to call it like it is - now they are all about finding "market-based" solutions that are acceptable to big industry and governments of all political stripes while real environmental solutions are shoved to the back of the line because they are politically unpalatable.
Time to go back to your roots guys.
"In this case, the fish are given feed that includes ingredients made from plants and fish-processing byproducts, thus reducing the need to use other fish species. Recent research has also looked at using insects in fish feed."
To who, the salmon? The ocean?
The environment needs serious help and we're focusing on making sure we can eat as many fish as we want? We don't need to eat salmon--certainly not as much as we do, anyway.
By the way, the David Suzuki Foundation gets money from the EnCana Corporation, a world leader in natural gas production and oil sands. Some environmentalists.
While EnCanada was listed as a donor in past Foundation financial reports, the Suzuki Foundation's 2008-09 annual report (the most-recent) does not make any mention of EnCana as a donor.
Travis Lupick
The Georgia Straight
Let me be clear - I support farming fish to take pressure of wild stocks.
But you have always said that salmon shouldn't be farmed because they eat fish. Why the change? Is it because the Packard Foundation says farmed Coho from Washington are good (not based on science but protectionism by the way)? Not a coincidence that the Packards are one of your biggest funders is it?
So, just like you conveniently ignore that Alaska salmon are mainly ranched and consume more fish than BC farmed salmon (based on your funders wishes again), you now conveniently forget what you've said again.
Give me an H.Y.P.O.C.R.I.T....what ya got...SUZUKI!!
Again, according to the Suzuki Foundation's 2008-09 annual report, in the most-recent years for which financial information is available, the Packard Foundation gave the Suzuki Foundation less than $10,000, which isn't enough money to put the Packards within three pages of the Suzuki Foundation's most-generous donors.
Travis Lupick
The Georgia Straight
Well, of course, that means we have nothing to worry about, as we can now trust DSF, the BC Liberals and James Hoggan.
The truth of the matter is that if someone or some group spends all their time trying to show us how green they are, you can be sure they are trying to hide something. Being green, once you cut thru all the spin, is about common sense approaches to life and not being wasteful.
DSF, BC Liberals and James Hoggan have likely all been successful in their green efforts because they have done a great job at spinning us until we saw them as green.
I have made reference in the past to the Suzuki Foundation's Annual report and the large donation amounts indicated there for some major sources. IIRC, one of the foundation's publicity men didn't care for that.
From the report you link to, here are the big donors. I believe the amount categories are a cumulative figure over time, not the amount given in just the year ending in August 2009.
Suzuki Leadership Circle
$100,000–$249,999
Ray C. Anderson Foundation Inc.
John Bankes
Dr. Tara Cullis
Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation
John & Joyce Good
Keenan Family Research and Policy Fund in Sustainability
The Ontario Trillium Foundation
Herschel Segal Family Foundation
Dr. David Suzuki
$250,000–$999,999
The Bullitt Foundation
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
The Jim Pattison Foundation
Pomerleau
R. Howard Webster Foundation
$1,000,000+
Anonymous
The Lefebvre Charitable Foundation
Power Corporation of Canada
Stephen R. Bronfman Foundation
Trottier Family
The one the stuck out in my mind was the million dollars donated by Paul Desmerais's Power Corporation, an organization with a very long association with the Liberal Party and home to John Rae, brother of Liberal leadership contender Bob Rae.
Rod Smelser
Pretty disgusting and very harmful to our environment. No matter what you feed those farmed fish their waste ends up on the ocean floor and destroys whatever it covers. Why can Norwegian companies get away with polluting our oceans? Isn't there some regulation/law preventing that? What a lot of crap! Move them to closed pens inland.
The question is, which of the protein sources, (remember Biology 101 we can't live without protein), represents the most balanced equation? Plant protein is obviously first on the list, but it is followed closely by fish. Most fish are by far much more efficient convertors of protein into protein than chickens, hogs or cows could ever imagine being. Research is leading to an ever increasing rate of vegetable or other protein substitution in finfish aquaculture operations. Contrary to popular belief, fish farmers aren't stupid and have known for a long time that there is a finite amount of fish meal available in the world. Other types of protein sources will have to be developed in order for them to continue to grow fish. It is inevitable that research and development will further increase the efficiency of the protein equation even further.
We reached the point where we can outstrip what Mother Nature can produce a long time ago. The ocean is the last place where we have been using our our hunting and gathering ways as a method of food production for society. In my opinion, if we want to eat it, we better learn how to grow it, and we better learn how do it well. In the next 40 years, the human population is projected to increase by 50%. There will be another 3 billion people on this planet looking for dinner, and trying to figure out how to feed their families. Unless we meet the challenge of increasing our global food production systems, it wont be Mr. Jones eating Mr. Salmon anymore, it will be Mr. Jones eating Mr. Smith, and that ain't carnivorism.
I belive that farmed salmon is the only sustainable way to continue to eat the fish, ocean populations are getting decimated around the world, and in the wild open waters of the seas its hard to police fishermen. If we were not so wastefull we would not even be in this situation as it is, but we have to do the best we can with farming and make it as good as we can for a sustainable fish source or at least until wild stocks can replenish
Pages