David Suzuki: The twisted logic, and ethics, of nature’s opponents

Comments

Who is influencing Canada’s resource priorities? In a puzzling appeal to anti-American sentiment, some industry supporters claim that U.S. foundations are threatening Canadian policy by donating money to environmental groups here. These arguments have appeared in publications such as the Vancouver Sun and Calgary Herald, and on Sun TV.

Greenpeace has released research that points in a different direction, one that seems more logical. The Greenpeace report, “Who’s Holding Us Back?”, shows that multinational and U.S. corporations in the oil, mining, and chemical sectors, among others, have been spending money and using industry trade associations, think-tanks, lobbying, and revolving doors between government and industry to block action on climate change and influence resource policy in Canada and elsewhere.

Opponents of environmental initiatives point to recent protests against the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, which would carry bitumen from the Alberta tar sands to B.C.’s north coast. They say this opposition is part of a conspiracy by U.S. funders to ensure that oil keeps flowing to the U.S. and not to Asia. That the same people also oppose the Keystone XL pipeline, which would take bitumen from the tar sands to the U.S., doesn’t faze those who promote this twisted logic.

If these conspiracy theorists were truly upset about U.S. influence on Canadian infrastructure and resource development, they would lobby for greater national control of the oil industry, much of which is owned by U.S. and Chinese corporations. They might also question U.S. industry and foundation funding for organizations such as Canada’s right-wing Fraser Institute, which has the same charitable status as the David Suzuki Foundation and other conservation groups and is thus governed by the same rules.

The criticism of U.S. money going to Canadian non-profits is part of a recent spate of efforts to silence those who want to bring more balance to discussions about the fossil fuel industry and environmental issues. Sun Media, owned by media giant Quebecor, has been especially aggressive in its opposition to those who don’t go along with its pro-government, pro-industry way of thinking, with recent attacks on environmental groups and the CBC.

In one of those “revolving door” scenarios that the Greenpeace research highlights, Kory Teneycke left his position as Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s communications director to join Sun TV before its launch. Several reporters who were considered for positions at the TV channel have said that Teneycke told them part of their job would be to go after me. Sun Media has also campaigned to have the David Suzuki Foundation’s charitable status removed. Of course, one of Sun TV’s major personalities, Ezra Levant, has strong ties to the Harper government. He also launched the “ethical oil” campaign, which was taken over by Alykhan Velshi, who was recently hired as Stephen Harper’s planning director.

I wish I had the kind of influence over public policy that anti-environmentalists and news media claim I have but, alas, I think Greenpeace is much closer to the mark in saying that corporate interests, including many foreign interests, wield more power.

As for funding, just as we’re glad that Canadians donate money to important causes worldwide—from earthquake relief in Haiti to aid for famine victims in Africa— we’re pleased that people outside our borders understand the global importance of environmental protection in Canada.

Like many environmental organizations, the David Suzuki Foundation is able to do its work thanks to the many people who give us their time and money. Over half of our funding (55 percent) comes in donations from about 28,000 individuals— more than 9,000 of whom give us a bit of money every month. Philanthropic foundations and businesses provide the rest. Our funding from sources in the U.S. and other countries ranges from six to 10 percent per year. All must meet the requirements of our ethical gift acceptance policy.

I encourage everyone to carefully consider the arguments on both sides. If you agree that Canadians should help slow rampant extraction and use of fossil fuels to protect the environment and human health, then please support our work and the work of similar organizations. And although we’re extremely grateful for all the support we get from Canadians, we’re happy to accept donations from people anywhere in the world who want to protect nature, and fend off its enemies.

Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation editorial and communications specialist Ian Hanington.

Comments (13) Add New Comment
NoLeftNutter
Now that the air is coming out of the CAGW ballon the poor DSF is seeing its donations being cut back to the level prior to his conversion to the global warming religion. That would be about half his donations down the drain. Gosh, fewer international flights, vacations and homes for poor David. How is the West Coast Watermelon going to survive without that big bag of other people's money?
0
1
Rating: -1
Picasso Cat
Well said Suzuki.

Sometimes I question whether we really true do live in a democracy or industry driven eco-warfare.

The environment needs stewards more then ever, let is be Suzuki Foundations and its funders or others. Someone has to be a watchdog of these industry & government in-bed antics.
1
1
Rating: 0
hAYOKA
you can always tel when someone has no real point , they start calling people names .
0
1
Rating: -1
Goldorak
Funny Suzuki quotes the Greenpeace report, a glossy empty piece that found US Government subsidies as the main source of so called doing nothing. Funny indeed when Suzuki has been receiving $69 millions from Tides Canada over 10 y period, funny indeed when climate "research" has been in the tens of billions since the Rio summit. The other main funding exposed by Greenpeace is about a fifth of Suzuki's Tides funding!
Woaw... David, obfuscating your funding again? LOL
1
1
Rating: 0
jSlides
You do realize that Greenpeace is a multi-national corporation that makes millions yearly. It lost its charity status because it is a for profit company.
0
0
Rating: 0
Goldorak
0
0
Rating: 0
Martin Dunphy
Goldorak:

I find it hard to believe that you, and others, are so naive as to believe that an obviously lighthearted, tongue-in-cheek approach to fundraising is somehow a sinister attack on trusting, innocent children.
But there you are.
(And I'm not aware of many children who shop by credit card and demand 100-percent tax receipts for their holiday shopping.)
0
0
Rating: 0
RickRickity
Now, now, Mr. Suzuki, let's not let a good opportunity to spout your rhetoric get in the way when all the facts state that you'd rather us all do as you say, rather than do as you do. Unlike you and your buddy, Al Gore; I for one, don't travel the world in a carbon spewing bus/jet when a good internet connection will enable me to take part in a meeting from the comfort of my own office. Maybe you guys should give it a try once in a while? After all - isn't your pal Al claiming that he invented the darned thing??
0
1
Rating: -1
Goldorak
Martin Dunphy, how about the NFB funding Suzuki in school... that's innocent perhaps? I notice you quietly votes down the post on funding... LOL
1
1
Rating: 0
Dave Miner
Having worked in the oil industry I know a little bit about fluid and thermal dynamics that served me well during my career. This understanding leads me to believe there are clever ways to use what we know using our current technology to substantially reduce energy use. These ideas just require action to incorporate these products or processes into our everyday living, one house or business at a time, industry by industry, we can do it.

An EarthShip Home is a step in the right direction, although expensive and requires modifications for a Canadien Winter, so are many other ideas worthy of considering. There is an semi-annual contest between universities that showcases several approaches to achieving the same ends, reducing energy required from a large central utility.

The only way to measure success is by how much less you pay for energy, start by driving less and think of new ways to save energy, don't leave it to someone else to decide how to spend your money. I have confidence that there are good ideas out there. Building houses the same old way will ensure you pay and pay and pay.

Only a communist could think of a system that is more centralized than a public utility (or not) that is demanding you pay forever and never own anything, sounds like a corporate commy system to me.

I also know that many of you on both sides of the issue are played like fiddles when some self interested lobbyist tells you when to dance, paychecks sometimes depend on it I suppose.

Think Global, Act Local.

But above all be peaceful and clever.
1
1
Rating: 0
Mike S
The 3.5 billion figure struck me as a lot of money. So I went and looked at the "research" by Greenpeace. It turns out that the 3.5 billion $ figure actually comes from some blog post on CNN and the post doesn't exist anymore! It turns out the 3.5 billion is the TOTAL amount of money spent on lobbying for ALL causes at the federal level in the US. I can't help but think Suzuki is distorting the truth by making it look like they are spending all this money on climate action.The greenpeace report is really just a propaganda document backed up by references from a bunch of like-minded sources. Suzuki's was once a scientist but now he is simply a parrot of these environmental groups.
0
0
Rating: 0
Ian_Hanington
Mike S. is correct. The $3.5 billion figure is for federal lobbying in the U.S. and is an editing error for which I take responsibility. That part of the column is referring to efforts (not just lobbying) in Canada and elsewhere. And it's still a lot of money. My apologies for the error, but the Greenpeace research is sound, and we stand behind the overall argument of the column.

Ian Hanington
Communications Specialist
The David Suzuki Foundation
0
0
Rating: 0
Some Guy Named Bob
w00t! Its propaganda time in the comments section with the rightwing lunatic fringe!

*WARNING TO ALL GS READERS!

Check the news, in July of 1998, Goldorack and Rickrickity and Noleftnutter were arrested, charged and later convicted of a series of crimes in what was at the time known as The College Date Rape Ring. Now, I won’t repost their real names but its important for everyone to know that they’ve all done jail time for drugging young women and doing terrible things to them.

http://www2.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=44e7-a6d0/DateRapists

See? I can lie too.

Isn’t it fun? Anyone can post anything they like on the net - doesn't mean it’s true. Now, scientific journals on the other hand, not so much. So, now, why don't you liars/deniers and useful idiots take a look at some serious science rather than reading BS rightwing, corporate sponsored talking-points? AGW isn’t a political issue, it’s a scientific issue and the experts have spoken pretty damn clearly.

*this is satire
1
1
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.