Density rises on Lonsdale Avenue in North Vancouver

Comments

Construction has begun where there used to be an Extra Foods store on Lonsdale Avenue at the corner of 17th Street in North Vancouver.

When this joint venture between Anthem Properties and Loblaw Property West—called Local on Lonsdale—is finished, a 20-storey condo tower with 175 homes, a 43,700-square-foot grocery, and 8,600 square feet of commercial space will be in place.

This massive development won’t be the last of its kind on the city’s famous avenue, which climbs the hill from Burrard Inlet toward Grouse Mountain.

A few blocks down on Lonsdale, the Onni Group is eyeing three 18-storey, mixed-use condo towers on what is currently a Safeway site at the corner of 13th Street. Based on plans unveiled early this year, the developer wants at least 400 apartments.

Onni has yet to secure approval from city council. But another developer, Wesgroup Properties, has received just that for a property across the street to the south. Also at 13th and Lonsdale, Wesgroup will build 10 storeys of residential units, plus three floors of commercial space.

This seemingly rapid pace of development in a municipality of about 12 square kilometres has naturally raised questions about the direction the City of North Vancouver is heading in as it deals with growth.

“The way we deal with it is we talk about the benefits and how it makes life better for us,” Mayor Darrell Mussatto told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview.

According to Mussatto, it’s concern for the environment that is driving the densification of his municipality.

“What we’re looking at is you’re seeing a city of the future, where we’re reducing our carbon footprint, which is the critical reason why we’re doing this,” the third-term mayor explained.

According to Mussatto, business is also doing well. “Lots of people are able to walk to their shopping,” he said. “And that works extremely well for the Lonsdale corridor and on Lower Lonsdale. People like that. People are saying, especially as they age, ‘I don’t need a big house anymore, nor do I want one.’ ”

But this pace of development has Coun. Pam Bookham calling for a slowdown.

“People anecdotally tell me that they are feeling that the city is growing very quickly,” Bookham told the Straight in a phone interview. “I’m not sure that our transportation systems are keeping pace. We’re challenged to provide employment close to home.”

The three-term councillor noted that although Mussatto suggests that he supports an average growth of one percent per year, she doubts that will hold true, given the interest of developers in this municipality at the foot of the North Shore mountains.

“Part of the attraction is the willingness of past councils to grant significant density bonusing, and that has meant that while other municipalities have seen development activity slow down in recent years, that hasn’t been the case in the city,” Bookham said.

The councillor cited as an example a proposal by Concert Properties to develop 801 Harbourside Drive, “where residential was not contemplated in our last official community plan”.

Passed in 2002, the city’s OCP is undergoing review, a process that could take until early 2013.

An official community profile prepared by the City of North Vancouver in 2009 puts its population at more than 48,000. “Substantial growth in the 1960s and 1970s was followed by more modest increases over the next two decades,” the document states. “Although the City’s population continues to rise, the rate of growth has fallen during the past census period, a trend that parallels other North Shore communities.”

Mussatto is aware of this trend, and he made the same reference when he questioned Bookham’s suggestion that North Vancouver may be growing too fast.

“There’s always peaks and valleys in growth,” Mussatto said. “We grew faster in the ’60s than we did in the first 10 years of 2000. But because it was all single-family houses [during the ’60s and ’70s], you didn’t notice it. Now we’re growing slower, but you can notice it more because you’re going up.”

Comments (7) Add New Comment
DsHK
Density = increased number of homeowners paying property taxes. That is all.
0
0
Rating: 0
good
Good.... we can only build up, these units will be semi affordable, by vancouver stands, increase density along a transit corridor, and help rejuvenate lonsdale. Hopefully some the developers are charge a large developer fee for a density bonus as well to contribute to the neighbourhood.
0
0
Rating: 0
vis
According to BC Stats for 2009-2010, CNV had the highest population increase at 3.6% compared to Vancouver at 2.3, Surrey at 3.4, Richmond at 1.7, the District of NV at 1.8 and West Vancouver at 1.6. Taking into account the projects identified in the article and many others not included, this rate of growth will continue for many years to come. All of this growth is the result of densification as the City, bounded by the District and Burrard Inlet, has no option to sprawl.
0
0
Rating: 0
Ripley
Compare and contrast with Vancouver, where residents lose their shit over any development higher than 6 stories in an established neighbourhood. Kudos to North Van for allowing dense, walkable growth.
0
1
Rating: -1
Living in LoLo
I have to agree with Bookham, the density is too rapid and we are not able to sell the units we have built so far and those that have sold are mostly being rented. We need affordable housing, not more housing. Where are we going to find the businesses to fill all the bonused commercial space, we are a small city and one that has yet to attract over town commercial shopping traffic. We are a financially strong city, but it is time to coast and let those who do live here catch up. We don't want cookie cutter developments where young couples are forced to rent and raise kondo kids, especially since the city has been slack in ensuring accessible public green space! And where are the developments for the grandparents of the cookie cutter grandchildren? Concern for the environment is not what's driving density Mayor Mussatto, nice try.
1
1
Rating: 0
7 year resident living on the lonsdale corridor
i did not see one mention anywhere in that article about any sort of Green Space/ Park/ Playground/ Dogwalk area.
Without any of this, without having space for people to go outside of their condo and enjoy a piece of grass and a tree, it sounds a bit like a fancy caged chicken situation... oh, yes and when we go out we are offered shopping, only shopping. just like chickens, people (especially those with children) need "free access to dirt and grass.... and tree shade). i don't mind so much the growth but please, give the families who cannot afford a house something to smile about- a greenspace right at their door would be something our whole community could benefit from. I am a mother of young children who once lived in a condo situation and just to get any fresh air i had to face packing all of my gear and walking 3 blocks to get a piece of grass and some shade. but it's very time consuming to walk 3 blocks with a child (especially when you want to just be outside for half an hour before lunchtime for example). Things are different for me now, i live in a house and the kids are out the back door and in the yard in minutes. If we want a community of happy well adjusted children (who aren't' glued to the tv/computer we need to provide easy access. if you pile tons of families without any convenient place for the children to run, jump and play, then they'll all be bouncing off the walls in the condo. lets not forget that these children will be running our community and country one day, and whether you have children or not, the concern for happy and healthy children (and their parents) should always be a priority in these projects.
1
0
Rating: +1
Wake up
Exactly what this city needs. MORE box condos, so small in size to match the likes of condos in Toyoko. Give me a break.
In Canada, we do not need to live NOR should we, in small cookie-cutter 400-600 sq ft condos, where only in this city can they (the developers/real estate agents and off-shore owners) sucker Vancouverites into believing and accepting a Closet (5x5) to be called a DEN or 2nd bedroom. Where building code standards and "quality of life" and living conditions for Canadians standards have gone out the windows (or lack of ) as each and every condo being built is based on Asian standards..WHY do we allow this to happen? Why do we allow developers to build these units, have off-shore owners BUY these units and WORSE re-sale or RENT these TERRIBLE condos to Canadians??
We really are suckers., Why have we allow OUR standards to be set so low?
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.