Ex-Mountie says RCMP is a toxic workplace
Ex-Mountie Rob Creasser knows how bad the RCMP is as a workplace. He got sick because of it. In 2010, following almost three years of medical leave after he was diagnosed with depression, the Kamloops man quit the national police force.
It doesn’t surprise him that allegations of persecution, including accounts of sexual harassment of female officers such as Cpl. Catherine Galliford, are in the news.
“We have harassments—not just sexual harassment but harassment in general—that have not been dealt with in years,” Creasser told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview from Kamloops.
The ex-constable doesn’t expect conditions to improve much. He said that unless RCMP members are represented by a union, many will continue to suffer from unchecked workplace mistreatment.
It’s a situation that Creasser is helping to change. He is currently a spokesperson for the Mounted Police Professional Association of Canada, a group of frontline officers fighting for the right to collective bargaining in the federal force.
The MPPAC is a merger between two Mountie organizations, the B.C. Mounted Police Professional Association and the Mounted Police Association of Ontario. In 2009, the two groups won a charter challenge before the Ontario Superior Court against RCMP regulations that prevent them from forming a union. The federal government appealed the decision.
According to Creasser, the association expects a ruling from the Ontario Court of Appeal sometime in the spring.
“Overall, it’s dysfunctional,” Creasser said about the RCMP as a workplace. “At times, toxic.”
The RCMP national headquarters in Ottawa refused a Straight request for an interview regarding the demand for a union. Spokesperson Cpl. David Falls said the organization will not comment on a matter that is pending before the courts.
Workplace problems have been highlighted in reports such as the one prepared by David Brown in 2007. A former head of the Ontario Securities Commission, Brown called for sweeping organizational and cultural changes in the force.
That same year saw the release of another study regarding the force. In that paper, organizational expert and author Linda Duxbury stated that the current RCMP culture does not support change.
As a psychologist many police officers consult, Mike Webster has heard a lot of stories.
In a phone interview, he said RCMP members don’t have the same avenue that municipal police officers have for their grievances, as the latter are represented by unions.
“Police people are hard-driving problem solvers,” Webster noted. “And sometimes they step on each other’s toes, and these conflicts arise naturally. But in the municipal-police world, there’s a process to deal with them. In the RCMP, there’s no process. And these issues just go on and on and on.”
Creasser explained that a union would also allow members to negotiate for better police resources to improve the RCMP’s service to the public. These include adequate manpower and equipment.
“The model that we use to determine how many people should be policing, say, in Kamloops is at least 20 years out-of-date,” he said. “We don’t actually have the time to be actually proactive in our communities to try and prevent crime.”
It’s a concern that Creasser knows well. In 2006, he was slapped with a gag order by his superiors. They wanted to keep him from raising questions about whether or not the force provided adequate protection to the four Mounties who were gunned down in a notorious shooting incident in Mayerthorpe, Alberta, in 2005.
It was downhill for his career from that point on, Creasser said. He simply got tired of fighting. He became depressed.
Creasser is certain that many active officers are having the same problems he encountered and getting sick because of it. “I can guarantee it,” he said.







My dad was a member from 1969-1981. Drug squad (Windsor) and Customs & Excise (Toronto). He left for all of the reasons you hear about: tired of the abuse, mismanagement, and being put through a psychological meat grinder.
BTW: the force endorses drinking among its members. The former "O" Division headquarters (Jarvis/Dundas) in Toronto: had a private mess hall for members to drink, in private. "Be a man, and drink away your pain!"
My dad died 5.5 years ago. An alcoholic (like many former and present members of the RCMP), he struggled with PTSD and depression for most of his 56 years. His blood alcohol level: 0.45. The RCMP were involved and made an "oopsie" the day he died.
And of course, wrong decision again because there is nothing superior about a man sticking it to a woman when he is her boss and on the job, nothing, not even a large dick. Even if your president your going down for the count, especially if the women says I wasn't into it even if she is married. The police are not solving their internal problems because it isn't viewed as a problem to politicians who fight to keep the costs of crime down by trying to ignore it while building a police force that is tolerant of certain crimes and women are an easy target.
Watch "Smear Campaign Canada" a You Tube video by broadpowers.
A union would also be able to expose the senior RCMP who are currently covering up just about everything they can. Currently an RCMP officer could be fired for going public but if they were unionized their union would be representing them in exposing "problems".
the Canadian consitution gives workers the right to unionize, right to associate. Why would the government violate the RCMP workers' rights? It certainly hasn't been a problem in cities which all have unionized police forces. I don't expect the current Conservative government to give the RCMP the right to unionize, they need them to implement all their grand schemes to deprive the rest of us of our rights and privacy.
Eventually the RCMP will once again have a difficult time recruiting new officers and then bring in unsuitable individuals.
I was burnt out after working years of shifts that were short of manpower. Our bosses refuse to call an extra member out on overtime because they don't want to spend the $. Instead they say they will "risk it out". That is a common term used in the RCMP. It means they are willing to take chances on a members' life and place the public in jeopardy. Good for them, I'm sure it helps get a promotion for someone. Members go to work knowing they are working in an unsafe environment. What do you think that sort of treatment tells it's membership? That we are NOT worthy of being safe. We are not cared for by our employer yet we do our job to the best of our ability with little complaint. Until we burn out...and no one notices that, they assume you just got lazy. The RCMP is an assuming bunch. Our employer makes a tough job ever tougher and more stressful.
As far as the RCMP act goes, that's a Kangaroo court. They make the rules and they break them all according to how they want it to turn out. They manipulate and control. That is all they know. And they do NOT want outsiders telling them how to do their business.
The RCMP Act prevents members from talking publicly about the RCMP. What about our RIGHTS and FREEDOMS? Members do NOT have RIGHTS as long as they are employed (aka owned) by the RCMP. Period.
For example, nepotism and favoritism fully applies in the promotion process as RCMP management apply the concept of "best fit" instead of "best candidate". The promotion boards also determine who they want promoted before the promotion convenes. The problem with these promotion methods is that it breeds the same type of cloned, and incompetent management style within the RCMP as in most cases, the "political favorite" is promoted.
A lot of newly promoted management within the RCMP have no concept on how to do properly draft a performance evaluation on a subordinate, this is a basic Management 101 skill set. If a superior is unable to apply this concept, it gives a strong indication of what other management skills are lacking.
I had the experience of dealing with a individual in Ottawa HQ who had NO experience in management who was appointed to an EX-01 position which involved being responsible for managing a Branch of approximately 50 people. This newly appointed EX-01 had previously worked as a subordinate (Administrative Assistant) under the head of Human Resources for the entire RCMP. This EX-01, along with the manager drafted my performance appraisal which contained multiple erroneous info. I replied with a email rebuttal which also contained the reference "one would think that an OIC would know the corporate policy on how to complete a performance evaluation". The EX-01 in question replied back to me via email and indicated that "being an OIC, I should NOT know the full policy on how to complete a performance evaluation", she also copied the email response to my Manager, my current EX-01 and my Director General.
I am glad I am retired and no longer working at the RCMP.