Extension of Vancouver seawall from Kitsilano to Jericho beach under consideration
Vancouver city council and the park board are both set to discuss the possibility of extending the seawall from Kitsilano to Jericho beach as separate motions come forward this month.
A motion will be moved by Non-Partisan Association councillor George Affleck and seconded by Green councillor Adriane Carr at city council next week proposing that staff look into an extension along the 3 km stretch.
“It really is about doing that research, and asking staff to come back with a report to do proper public engagement, find out what the opportunity is, look at the funding partners, look at security, privacy, all those things, and report back to council on the possibility of how this might work,” Affleck told the Straight.
Vancouver park board chair Sarah Blyth also plans to bring a motion forward later this month on the issue. She said the seawall extension is under consideration by the park board following an offer of a private donation to help fund the link.
“There’s been a donor come forward who uses the seawall, a private donor, who would be willing to donate a substantial amount,” Blyth said in a phone interview.
“It’s helpful when you have a certain amount of money donated…it would help us leverage other monies."
Blyth said a public consultation process would be the first step as the city considers the possibility of a seawall extension.
“First what comes is the public consultation to see if it’s something that Vancouver wants,” said Blyth.
“What we do is just put it out there, see if that’s what people want, do a community consultation, see if it can work.”
Blyth added it’s “a priority” for both the park board and the city to look into completing the seawall network.
“It seems that everybody agrees that this is something we need to look at,” she said.
“I’m hoping once we put the motion forward, we’re going to move as quickly as possible to get something on this.”
Affleck’s motion will go before council next Tuesday (July 10).Blyth will move her motion on July 23.






That beach is public property, not owned by the residences behind. We have the right to use that strip of beach behind the houses, so dont let the rich people veto something that benefits millions of people.
If they put up a fuss, we should all go out and use the beach. Privacy should not be a concern of the city. No one else's yard gets special treatment for privacy, so neither should these ultra-rich people.
We need some wild places left in place. Turning it into another exercise expressway is in my opinion a royally bad idea. It seems like there would be better places to put the money. How about buying the Arbutus rail corridor and getting a cool bike/walk way through there?
That aside, what happened to the preservation of the natural state of the beach in that area? Wasn’t the idea to leave it in its natural state for the waterfowl, etc.?
Pave paradise put up a sea wall.
Is that Grouse Grind paved yet?
If they want to help wate foul, they can put posts in the water with bird houses on top like they did in port moody.
The rich like to use the "natural state" as an excuse to have their own private beach which they do not own.
I am all for preserving nature and wildlife habitats, but the fact is that small stretch of beach is not home to lots of wildlife, and would not really be affected by a sidewalk. The only things affected would be the rich people who dont want to give up their private beach.
"rich" after all let's stick it to him. I'll pay for the public viewing spot at Moonbeam's house complete with those steel binoculars. Apparently that's all it takes.
What I worry about more is the need to homogenize every inch of public space in Vancouver and make it identical. You don’t think that the Parks Board will be able to resist trucking in sand to ‘beautify’ the beach, do you? Perhaps build it all the way to Wreck Beach to gawk at nudists in comfort…
Finally, I do wonder why these magnanimous donors, that have been popping up lately, are anonymous. Is there a hidden agenda that we should be aware of?
Have you slalomed the Sea Wall lately? Nevermind the seaside vistas and magnificent consciousness of Nature incarnate there! No, one is too hyper aware of double-wide baby buggies, in-line skaters swooshing past, inert tourists and testosterone fueled cyclists. Yeah, let's do this to the "rich people's park"....and pave it too!
Hopefully the "Public" won't fail to appreciate the irony of criminal charges against John Laxton for similar actions on West Van waterfront - published by the cbc today.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/07/05/bc-fishe...
It's not a long stretch from one point to the other, and the cries about destruction of natural habitat are overblown ... probably by the very people who want to keep this area off limits to anyone but themselves.
You rarely hear anyone complain about how a similar seawall absolutely transformed the shores of False Creek into a wonderful place for people from all over to stroll and cycle and enjoy the water front.
Miguel
"Blyth said a public consultation process would be the first step as the city considers the possibility of a seawall extension. “First what comes is the public consultation to see if it’s something that Vancouver wants,” said Blyth. “What we do is just put it out there, see if that’s what people want, do a community consultation, see if it can work.”
But why consult when the next offered is:
"Blyth added it’s “a priority” for both the park board and the city to look into completing the seawall network."
So public input be damned.
Shall we expect a social media campaign, a public meeting for the neighbours (who's concerns will be ignored), and construction to start next spring? If so, why not just be honest about commencing the project rather than wasting people's time?
Have they not heard or read that sea levels rising and shorelines are eroding? So, when this seawall erodes ..Who is going to pay for it? Of course, it will be the Tax Payers of Vancouver.
As if we don't have enough debt from the 2010 Olympics that we have to pay off. Not to mention increasing Managers' salaries there at City Hall. Good Way to Keep the Hierachy Employed.
Ramona de Graaf, BSc., MSc.
Marine Biologist and forage fish specialist
Miguel
Pages