False Creek community meeting draws candidates from all parties

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Candidates from all municipal parties attended one of the first of several community election events Monday (October 24), organized by the False Creek Residents’ Association.

      Mayoral candidates Suzanne Anton of the Non-Partisan Association and Randy Helten of the electoral group Neighbourhoods for a Sustainable Vancouver were present at the two-hour meeting, as well as over 20 park board, school board and city council candidates.

      Some of the issues raised by audience members and organizers included questions about Creekside Park, and citizen and community engagement in the planning process.

      Mayoral candidates had two minutes each to address the question of community engagement in the planning process.

      “Neighbourhoods know best what goes on in their own neighbourhoods,” replied Anton.

      “They know what their neighbourhoods need, they know what works well in their neighbourhoods, they know what deficiencies are in their neighbourhoods… and the city needs to be listening and paying attention.”

      Helten claimed that city hall “is not listening to the citizens”.

      “In July 2010 I spoke to city council about an important issue, and my message to the mayor and council at the time was that our whole city has to function based on trust,” he said. “If we cannot trust city hall, we are wasting our time.”

      The result of that meeting, Helten noted, was “the famous f-bomb incident”.

      Each of the candidates from Vision Vancouver, the NPA, NSV and the Green party had a chance to make a brief opening statement at the beginning of the meeting. Independent park board candidate Eleanor Hadley was among the candidates who addressed the small crowd in a school gymnasium.

      Hadly, a 90-year-old parks activist, has been speaking at city council and park board meetings for decades, mainly in opposition to the aquarium and commercialization in Stanley Park.

      “Just this summer, this parks board commissioner gave the aquarium permission to build four buildings, one seven storeys high…I was the only one there to oppose it,” Hadley told the audience.

      “That’s what’s happened to public meetings. Nobody goes. I go, and I’ve been going there since 1960.”

      Several candidate meetings are scheduled in neighbourhoods across the city over coming weeks, including one hosted by Shaughnessy and Arbutus Ridge neighbourhood groups this evening (October 25), and one hosted by RAMP (Residents Association Mount Pleasant) on October 26.

      A mayor and council candidates meeting was held by the Cedar Cottage Neighbourhood House on October 22.

      The first major mayoral debate between Anton and Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson, hosted by the Vancouver Board of Trade, is scheduled to take place at 4 p.m. today.

      Comments

      5 Comments

      james green

      Oct 25, 2011 at 3:29pm

      When the NPA was in power at city hall what programs did they put in place to maximize residents equality in decision making? How many times did Anton bring up this issue and what did she do to work to correct any problems and concerns residents had in this regard?
      The same question goes for Robertson, who promised to open up city hall.
      The answer is they both carried on and perpetuated a culture of back room, non citizen based decision making.
      Now they act as if they are freedom fighters for citizens voices.
      Don't buy it. Once in power the NPA and Vision have shown they think they know better and only give lip service to the voices, wants and needs of Vancouver.
      It is clear, new people like Helten need to be elected as the old and tried closed door parties and their candidates need to be put out to pasture.

      0 0Rating: 0

      90?

      Oct 25, 2011 at 5:40pm

      Fck me but at 90 the elderly should not be in Council Meetings or Driving.

      They should go shopping or the washroom.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Peter W

      Oct 26, 2011 at 7:10am

      It is astonishing to hear the two developer financed parties (Vision and NPA) even pretend that they care about community consultation. A vote for either means that a bulldozer and a 60 story sterile energy leaking glass tower is coming to your back yard soon. After COPE has regrettably chosen to team up with Vision, I am delighted that NSV have stepped up and offered the voters of the city a real alternative. I’m voting for the “NSV Hack.”

      0 0Rating: 0

      rockerbiff

      Oct 27, 2011 at 3:24pm

      The De-Growth Party was not present

      0 0Rating: 0

      GZLFB

      Oct 28, 2011 at 8:54pm

      Sustainable, huh, a buzz word like the others. De-Growth wasn't there yesterday. Really each party or coalition needs one spokesman and they can litter more independents, they consider us litter don't they?
      Gregor Anton, have the courage to debate me?

      If there is a Mayoral Magic wand I want to know why the housing spell wasn't cast in 3 years. All these promises have some magical view of politics.

      Control the Cops! Mad Pride! Stonewall the Mental Health Act of 2005!

      Hey if Vision, COPE, NPA are environmental why require so many pages or more get signed instead of one like before their election bylaw.
      Millions can grab the book and not even bring them in signed fully. If you have team you can end up with 2 per page (See Alm's).

      @gzlfb (twit) #buday4vancouver
      www.bcindividualist.org

      0 0Rating: 0