Georgia Straight responds to John Furlong's news conference
TheGeorgia Straight has heard John Furlong’s statement this afternoon regarding an article in today’s newspaper. The story was backed up with eight sworn affidavits. Marvin Storrow, Furlong's lawyer, did not make his client available to respond to questions from the journalist, Laura Robinson. She also attempted without success to reach Mr. Furlong through his publisher, Douglas & McIntyre. Ms. Robinson was told that Mr. Furlong had “nothing more” to say to her.




'
while reading the hard copy story, in todays G. Straight. I agree with the Straight's response above.
I hope that you get it for Slander, only because I have been in a similar situation where things are written about someone and not any of it is true, and it is ALL taken out of context and embellished to make NEWS!
I think one might answer Why Now because the author wanted to have a lot of supported evidence before printing this. And I'm pretty sure the GS has lawyers who checked this article out before it was printed.
I am reminded of a saying :' the best defense is a strong offense'. We saw that aired on CBC today in one man's statement. A powerful man.
I will be praying for ALL of the victims to come forward - I say go for it Georgia Straight! They deserve to be heard.
This story is either: Not true. Somewhat true. Completely true.
See everyone in court (unless it doesn't get that far).
It will be interesting to hear ALL parties give their version, timelines, etc.
Why do I have a feeling that everyone involved has an angle?
Why did Furlong hide 5 years of his life BC? Well, now we know. Respect to the people who came forward with their stories. So sorry you had to endure such suffering.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
If it turns out to be true - roast away and shame on JF. Until then though it really is accusations already tainted with threats of blackmail.
All reported from the same person who previously was so irresponsible in her reporting based purely on her opinion that the sport of hockey encourages violence (what rubbish).
Who knows if she has it right this time - but burning posters for wondering if there are deeper motives (perhaps to break a real story for a change, personal vendetta, etc.) seems bit overboard. After all, it may turn out the only victim may be JF himself, if not the reported accusers.
RCMP and legal action upcoming will reveal if there is any truth. Until then really no one side is right or wrong. Not sure how anyone can have a side or opinion to support when simply all we have is an article stating affidavits and another side alleging blackmail...
Pages