Gurpreet Singh: The children of a common mother, India and Pakistan, remain divided

Comments

Whereas Canadians and the Americans continue to crisscross the route that passes through the Peace Arch border every day, Indians and Pakistanis settled in Vancouver wonder when the unnatural border dividing their neighbouring countries will open?

Much like Canada and the U.S., the two South Asian countries were connected before 1947, the year India got its independence from the British Empire.

At that point, it was divided on religious lines: a Hindu India and Muslim Pakistan.

As the 63rd anniversary of the independence and separation of the two nations is coming this weekend, there is a mixed feeling of celebration and despair among those who lost their loved ones in the religious violence that followed the division of India.

Thousands of people migrated to each side of the border, leaving behind their ancestral lands to restart their lives as refugees when Hindu-Muslim riots broke out.

The Sikhs had to leave behind their properties and the birthplace of Guru Nanak, the founder of their religion, in Pakistan as their leaders voted to go with India.

Among them was my father’s family. Though he is happy about his country’s independence, like the rest of the Indians he still bears the ugly memories of the partition.

Born in Khanewal, which is now in Pakistan he was eight years old when he migrated to India along with his mother and siblings.

My grandfather was a police officer and had opted to serve in Pakistan when the partition was announced.

Little did he realize that the Hindus and the Sikhs would soon be targeted by the Muslim fundamentalists, and likewise, the Muslims would be attacked by the Hindu and the Sikh extremists on the other side of the border.

According to my father, most people felt that the riots will be over and things would be normal within days.

However, my grandfather faced hostility from a few Muslim police officers who came from the Indian side of the border, and was advised by his well wishers to leave as the situation was turning ugly.

My grandfather had then sent his family to India, and joined them later. He remembers how the Hindus and the Muslims were offered drinking water and tea separately at the railway stations. On way to Lahore, their train was attacked by the mob.

My father heard the exchange of fire between the soldiers in the train and the rioters. He also saw severed limbs and dead bodies lying in a pool of blood.

Fortunately, they all reached safely to Lahore and later went to Jalandhar, where his eldest sister lived.

My father has always wished to travel to Pakistan and visit his old house. Although he has served with an oil company in Amritsar, a city close to the Indo-Pak border thath is now sealed, he never got a chance to go to the other side.

After all, the two countries, which can also be described as children of a common mother, have fought two wars and the visa regime between them has not been very smooth, except on some occasions.

My father was happy to see the Peace Arch border when he visited Vancouver. He wished that the border dividing India and Pakistan also open one day and he could visit the birthplace of Guru Nanak and his native village.

The Indians and Pakistanis who live in Canada can at least try to bridge the gap between the people of the two countries.

Last year, two progressive groups held a candle light vigil in the memory of those who died in the 1947 pogrom. Since the two nations were together in the freedom struggle, they can also hold joint independence celebrations and commemorate the unsung heroes who challenged the religious fundamentalists during riots.

Gurpreet Singh is a Georgia Straight contributor, and the host of a program on Radio India. He's working on a book tentatively titled Canada's 9/11: Lessons from the Air India Bombings.

Comments (6) Add New Comment
Moin Ansari
This thinking is exactly which creates tensions in South Asia.

Pakistan was never part of "India" which is a conglomeration of 570 states. Bharat (aka India) was never a unified country in any sense of the word.

Just because the British called it "India" didn't make it a country. The French called Viernam Indo-China, and the Dutch called another place Indo-Nesia. Columbus and other Europeans called islands in the Caribbean "West Indies".

The British conjurers like James Princep, manufactured Bharati history and concocted myths like Ashoka--even though there is no record of his existence in any contemporary Greek of Bharati narrative.

Pakistan was never part of "India"--a misnamed country on the river Indus (which is not in the country)

The Pakistani Civilization is 7000 years old (Mehargarh and Indus Valley). Pakistan like the rest of the world countries has been called many names in history--Melhullans, Assyrians, Akkadians, Arameans, Bactrians etc.. The IVC is only 3500 BC. The Mehergarh Cilivilzation–the other Pakistani Civilization preceded the IVC–thus the 7000 year number.

Pakistan's 7000 year old Civilization (Indus Valley and Mehargarh Civilization) had nothing to do with Bharat and was not Hindu.. They did not speak Sanskrit, ate beef, buried their dead, did not write left to right, were not rural, did not know the horse, wrote right to left in a pictographic Non-Sanskrit script, did not worship the Hindu Pantheon (Arjun, Sita, Ram, Ganesh, Kali Devi, Agni Mithra or the other 33 million), the did not use chariots (Arjun), lived in an urban setting, were not in any way connected to the stories of Ram and Sita (which were in a rural jungles of the Ganges), preceded Buddhism, and did not cremate the fallen. In language, dress, cuisine, religion they had nothing in common with the Hindus of the Ganges--the Indus Pakistanis were not Hindu in any sense of the word.

Editor Rupee News
http://www.rupeenews.com
0
0
Rating: 0
V Narayan
The article captures the senselessness of sectarian violence, often instigated by politicians for their own selfish ends.
0
0
Rating: 0
Mohandas
@ Editor of Rupee news : Moin Ansari , you say Pakistan was never part of India? Well ofcourse the name Pakistan isnt more than 63 years old itself so how can It be a 7000 year old civilization? As you said correctly there were 570 odd princely states, so neither was there an India and neither was there a Pakistan. So unless you want to have an open mind,open it Fully, not half way. The way you talk is Inflammatory itself by denying the existence of everything. How can you expect peace when there is no tolerance of facts that arent supportive of your cause?
0
0
Rating: 0
glen p robbins
What is disconcerting is that it would appear Canadians are slow to provide aid to Pakistan-which desperately requires it NOW---and were/are (it seems) far more willing to provide aid elsewhere including and particularly Haiti.

Does this have anything to do with the reputation Pakistan has developed among many westerners that they are a haven for terrorists/costing big $$$ in Afghanistan---or is it simply the time of the year----

or something else entirely?
0
0
Rating: 0
liaqat
Moin Ansar,people like you who do not want to live in peace,we are the same people, weather you call India,Pakistan or Bangladesh now the idea is to live in peace not why the Muslim invaders impose their religion on Indian(or whatever you want call it) and kill 200 million in the process.As human we are susceptible of conditioning and become patriotic Muslims,Hindu,Sikh, Pakistani,Indian or Bangladeshi in the end we are still the same people. THINK!! I am a Pakistani
0
0
Rating: 0
liaqat
Mr Ansari, what is the color of your sky? If you are talking about the ancient civilizations of Indus valley or Hindustan, whatever they practiced was definitely not the one to which you adhere to from 8th century onwards. Most likey, your ancestors were Hindus or belong to others sects and were forced to change their religion as your name indicate. Remember there were only 800 soldiers who came with Bin Qasim and 98% of the current day Muslims were largely hindu. As such, no matter how many divisions you want to create, we are the same people from the same area. Let's try to have to live in the present time; if your decision making process goes back to 5000 years before we decide where the human history started, we won't achieve anything or reach anywhere. Take off your blinders, please!
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.