Gwynne Dyer: The future of food riots
If all the food in the world were shared out evenly, there would be enough to go around.
That has been true for centuries now: if food was scarce, the problem was that it wasn’t in the right place, but there was no global shortage. However, that will not be true much longer.
The food riots began in Algeria more than a week ago, and they are going to spread. During the last global food shortage in 2008, there was serious rioting in Mexico, Indonesia, and Egypt. We may expect to see that again this time, only bigger and more widespread.
Most people in these countries live in a cash economy, and a large proportion live in cities. They buy their food, they don’t grow it.
That makes them very vulnerable, because they have to eat almost as much as people in rich countries do, but their incomes are much lower.
The poor, urban multitudes in these countries (including China and India) spend up to half of their income on food, compared to only about 10 percent in the rich countries. When food prices soar, these people quickly find that they simply lack the money to go on feeding themselves and their children properly—and food prices now are at an all-time high.
“We are entering a danger territory,” said Abdolreza Abbassian, chief economist at the Food and Agriculture Organization, on January 5.
The price of a basket of cereals, oils, dairy, meat, and sugar that reflects global consumption patterns has risen steadily for six months. It has just broken through the previous record, set during the last food panic in June 2008.
“There is still room for prices to go up much higher,” Abbassian added, “if, for example, the dry conditions in Argentina become a drought, and if we start having problems with winter kill in the northern hemisphere for the wheat crops.”
After the loss of at least a third of the Russian and Ukrainina grain crop in last summer’s heat wave and the devastating floods in Australia and Pakistan, there’s no margin for error left.
It was Russia and India banning grain exports in order to keep domestic prices down that set the food prices on the international market soaring.
Most countries cannot insulate themselves from this global price rise, because they depend on imports for a lot of domestic consumption. But this means that a lot of their population cannot buy enough food for their families, so they go hungry. Then they get angry, and the riots start.
Is this food emergency a result of global warming? Maybe, but all these droughts, heat waves and floods could also just be a run of really bad luck.
What is nearly certain is that the warming will continue, and that in the future there will be many more weather disasters due to climate change. Food production is going to take a big hit.
Global food prices are already spiking whenever there are a few local crop failures, because the supply barely meets demand even now. As the big emerging economies grow, Chinese and Indian and Indonesian citizens eat more meat, which places a great strain on grain supplies.
Moreover, world population is now passing through seven billion, on its way to nine billion by 2050. We will need a lot more food than we used to.
Some short-term fixes are possible. If the U.S. government ended the subsidies for growing maize (corn) for “bio-fuels”, it would return about a quarter of U.S. crop land to food production.
If people ate a little less meat, if more African land was brought into production, if more food was eaten and less was thrown away, then maybe we could buy ourselves another 15 or 20 years before demand really outstripped supply.
On the other hand, about a third of all the irrigated land in the world depends on pumping groundwater up from aquifers that are rapidly depleting. When the flow of irrigation water stops, the yield of that highly productive land will drop hugely.
Desertification is spreading in many regions, and a large amount of good agricultural land is simply being paved over each year. We have a serious problem here.
Climate change is going to make the situation immeasurably worse. The modest warming that we have experienced so far may not be the main cause of the floods, droughts, and violent storms that have hurt this year’s crops, but the rise in temperature will continue because we cannot find the political will to stop the greenhouse-gas emissions.
The rule of thumb is that we lose about 10 percent of world food production for every rise of one degree C in average global temperature. So the shortages will grow and the price of food will rise inexorably over the years. The riots will return again and again.
In some places the rioting will turn into revolution. In others, the rioters will become refugees and push up against the borders of countries that don’t want to let them in.
Or maybe we can get the warming under control before it does too much damage. Hold your breath, squeeze your eyes tight shut, and wish for a miracle.
Gwynne Dyer’s new book, Crawling from the Wreckage, was published recently in Canada by Random House.





http://bit.ly/fvcaMJ > "Technology created 50 rainstorms in Abu Dhabi's Al Ain region last year" (as with all recent Olympics - weather mod'ing is pretty fashionable these days).
seth
Then turn to our pet dogs. An average dog has an ecological footprint of two SUV's.
Miguel
Soylent green.
I assume you're volunteering to go first?
There ALREADY is enough for everyone, but the majority of the planet's food supply is destroyed each year to keep prices up. It's called false scarcity.
*********
I think that Gwynne manages to offer relatively balanced no BS assessments of many world issues, more so than almost any other commentator I can think of. Of course, there's no satisfying some zealots who lambaste Dyer's articles in here and who seem to take offense to him calling a spade a spade
******
May you each have your share of our daily bread.
Ghenghis and Don (brother).
statistics show that we are producing enough food to feed the entire world (at least once over). do you think a solution is to produce more food? if so, i would argue that production is one piece of the puzzle. to focus solely on production means we ignore and deny the existing inequalities and forms of oppression that are inherent in our current agricultural model.
your right! The global food crisis is an excuse to support geo-engineering and bio-technology. Industrialization of the food system has caused many of the environmental factors that contribute to the present scarcity (eg: drought). The focus on production feeds the issue of scarcity: the panic of food scarcity causes countries to ban exportation, having a ripple effect of surging food prices.
What we all need to do is get our hands dirty and plant some food. If you can, when you can, everyone needs to do their part to be a little more self-sufficient.
@ Mark Taylor, I agree with you that we should think twice about having many children... but by saying "reducing human population", implies that we should "get rid" of people. From Malthus to Indira Gandhi... do you still think population control is fair and just? What do you propose we do to control populations? Force sterilization? Force Birth control?
No, but what we can do is support education for women. Statistics show that in countries with higher literacy rates among women, poverty is less... Countries with higher literacy rates among women, have less population growth.