How Benjamin Netanyahu and Stephen Harper could work together to defeat Barack Obama

Comments

Former British prime minister Tony Blair was often ridiculed as "George Bush's poodle".

In light of Canada's decision to shut its embassy in Iran and expel Iranian diplomats, perhaps it's time to question whether Prime Minister Stephen Harper has become Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's poodle.

Writing in the Jerusalem Post today, columnist Ben Caspit makes it clear that Netanyahu wants to attack Iran before the U.S. election on November 6. But he's not getting support from all of his governing coalition partners.

A simple Google search reveals numerous references to Netanyahu's wish to strike before the U.S. election.

However, the Israeli paper Haaretz has noted that American officials don't believe that Netanyahu will follow through on this.

So what would happen if Netanyahu surprised the U.S. government and Israel suddenly started firing missiles where it believes Iranian nuclear tests are occurring?

Iran would likely respond by shutting down supertanker movements through the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices would skyrocket. And the U.S. economy would be in trouble again at the worst possible time for the Democrats.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney could then reiterate his comment from the GOP convention that the Obama administration had "thrown Israel under the bus".

Romney might also point to how Canada had anticipated this situation by shutting down its embassy and booting Iranian officials out of the country, whereas the Obama administration did nothing.

It's a scary scenario to think that the Israeli prime minister might be willing to start a war to get rid of a U.S. president whom he personally dislikes. Of course, Netanyahu and Harper both know that a Republican administration would be far less critical of new Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Never underestimate how wily conservatives can be when there's an election on the line.

Richard Nixon and his friends engineered the Watergate Hotel break-in.

George W. Bush, Karl Rove, and their allies went to great lengths to suppress voter turnout in 2000 and 2004. There was even a book published about this called Was the 2004 presidential election stolen?.

Meanwhile, Canada is still coming to terms with the robocall scandal, where voters were directed to the wrong polling stations before the 2011 election.

In light of this history, it's not beyond the realm of possibility for Israel to launch a pre-election strike on Iran—with the Harpercons' support and encouragement—to boost Romney's chances in the presidential election.

Related story: Law professor Payam Akhavan questions Harper government's decision to close Tehran embassy

Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.

Comments (24) Add New Comment
Moebius Stripper
Wait, wasn't Harper spending last month trashing Mark Carney's reputation over the whitewashed $100 bill? Seems like an odd thing to be spending his time on when a potential nuclear war is at stake. Or was that just part of his plot to distract us from his ultimate goal of Zionist world domination? Or, wait, is *that* just what they want us to think? Man, I am so confused.
1
0
Rating: +1
Charlie Smith
Hi Moebius,

I can always count on you to jump in whenever I write anything that doesn't parrot the mainstream-media line about Stephen Harper.

Charlie
0
0
Rating: 0
Ben Gazarra
Yeah, well Paul Mulcair also said he unequivocally supports Israel in all circumstances so now what? We have all 3 parties here in AIPAC's pocket.
0
0
Rating: 0
uknow
If the Iranian leader is killed in such an offensive then instead of the oil being shut down the people will be liberated from that lunatic. Oil prices drop?
0
0
Rating: 0
Moebius Stripper
Charlie, there are plenty of ways to criticize Harper without veering into conspiracy theory territory. (Excellent but very long case in point right here: http://allangregg.com/?p=80) Believe me, I do it all the time. If you've taken my comments to mean that I'm a Harper apologist, then that gives me even less confidence in the other conclusions you've managed to draw on this page and elsewhere.
0
0
Rating: 0
Moebius Stripper
Actually, credit where it's due: Payam Akhavan's comments in the linked related story are an excellent example of someone putting forth a thoughtful and intelligent criticism of the Harper government's policy on this very issue. The professor clearly lays out the facts and then draws conclusions that people in charge of drafting policy would do well to heed. This is something quite different from pointing out that no one's *disproved* a far-fetched possibility of intergovernmental collusion, and besides, there was this OTHER case that was kind of the same but different, and fact that the mainstream media is not entertaining these hallucinations is somehow an indictment of the mainstream media.
0
0
Rating: 0
Mark Fornataro
Moebius- I believe Charlie' suspicions are well- founded and I felt the same way before I read his piece. As soon as I heard about it on CBC I thought it seemed awfully arbitrary and strange timing. If Harper is so zealous about admonishing countries with human right violations there is no shortage of others who are also guilty. Iran has plenty of faults but starting a war with Iran is asking for trouble. There is nothing wrong with a journalist warning of unnecessary saber-rattling; it should, in fact, be their job to do so. Not doing so by the mainstream media helped pave the way for the unjustified war in Iraq.
1
1
Rating: 0
Moebius Stripper
Mark - I agree with most of your comment, which I think was a far more charitable reading of this piece than it deserved. Indeed, contrary to Charlie's claim, I'm no Harper supporter, and agree with you that the Prime Minister's support for human rights abroad is...opportunistic, to say the least. I agree with you completely that starting a war with Iran right now would be "unnecessarly saber-rattling", bad for just about everyone - *especially* the overwhelming majority of Israelis, Palestinians, and Iranians on the ground.

However, to paraphrase another commenter on another Straight article about Iran...did someone just write an article about foreign policy vis-a-vis Iran without mentioning Ahmadinejad? (Same answer both times: why, yes, someone just did.) The Iranian president has said some pretty terrifying things lately; it's not exactly a stretch for someone in a position of power to genuinely believe that Iran is a threat that needs to be dealt with somehow. One can argue compellingly against war while still recognizing the gravity of the situation. But I guess that if one thinks that Ahmadinejad doesn't even merit a mention in an article about the possibility of war with Iran, one has to resort to conspiracy theories in order to explain why anyone would support such a thing. And that makes the anti-war side a pretty soft target.
0
0
Rating: 0
derp
When are we going to close the Chinese embassies for gross human rights violations, executions with little due process, corruptness, amassing weapons of mass destruction and threatening their own neighbours (Taiwan) to establish a hegemony in the south china sea?

This is just a game played by Harper so he can score points with the future potential Romney administration. Harper is still pissed Obama shot down his pipeline across drinking water resevoires in the US and it's all of us that will pay dearly when Romney doesn't win, and the giant empire beside us remembers how Harper backstabbed them during the election with this petty stunt that ignores severe ramifications for prisoners on death row in Iran, and all their dual citizens living here.



1
0
Rating: +1
Charlie Smith
Moebius is often quick to jump in whenever I muse about what Harper might really be up to. If I do this, I always make it clear that this is a possibility and not a certainty. But then Moebius slaps me with the "conspiracy theory" label, which is a standard method of trying to frame someone in the public's mind.

Is robocalls a "conspiracy theory"? Was the Watergate break-in a "conspiracy theory"? Was the support for Pinochet's coup, which led to the death of an elected president in a democracy, a "conspiracy theory"? Were the Bay of Pigs or the Iran-Contra affair conspiracy theories?

I've concluded that Moebius is quite possibly a Conservative troll and maybe even a paid Conservative troll. Why else would he pay such attention to a writer with whom he regularly disparages as some sort of fool? But hey, that's probably just another conspiracy theory.

Charlie Smith
0
0
Rating: 0
Denyse
Moebius By you're comments you come across as pissed off when someone knocks Harper and they way you accuse another and a few other things you said leads me to believe you're either a troll or a shit disturber, saying someone is a conspiracy nut over anything to do with Harper is mean and puts doubt in the mind of others about their opinions Why are you picking fights with those who speak against Harper? I think you believe yourself to be smarter then others and believe me you come across as a know it all argumentative ass Don't bother to reply cause I could care less and I'm gone after this comment anyway.
0
0
Rating: 0
dave19
I find it very strange they do
0
0
Rating: 0
dave19
I find it very strange they use the conspiracy thing on 9/11Truth to.
0
0
Rating: 0
miguel
Asshats tend to think and behave the same, no conspiracy necessary; think magnetism.
Miguel
0
0
Rating: 0
madlove
Im starting to think Israel / Iran might just be the new Cold War, with all the spending, subterfuge and proxy shooting-wars that it justified.
0
0
Rating: 0
Xtina
It's hard not to cringe at the current state of Canadas' foreign policy with John Baird and PM Steve ideologies running the show. Canadas' candidacy for a seat on the United Nations Security Council in 2010 was denied because of this governments' foolish non diplomacy.
0
0
Rating: 0
Mr. Singh
I can't believe this kind of conspiracy theory moonbat thinking actually constitutes an article in a published paper.... When Obama was whinging about how 'words matter' all the moonbat leftists were echoing the call, but when the Iranians threaten genocide then all of a sudden 'words don't matter'... make up your minds left wingnuts (I said minds because it would appear leftwing nuts have more than one to choose from on most issues)...
0
1
Rating: -1
Ron j
I don't dislike people that follow any religion.I do dislike Countries like,( mabye specifically is a better word ), Isreal, that constantly invade Palestine, & now want to,( like a ((war)) junkie/OCD'ers will ), invade Iran.

The possible threat of "them" having nuclear based electricity is unfathomable to Isreal's politicians.
If Iran builds a nuclear plant good for them. If Isreal wants to bully its way into starting WW III as fast as they can... bad for all of us.

0
0
Rating: 0
KiDDAA Magazine
Why is anyone surprised by the Cons and Harper. He apologized for Canada not joining the Iraq war, that of course never found WMDs. Said nothing when Israel started a war in Lebanon that killed 2000 civilians. He now says Iran is a danger but US intelligence and the UN says Iran is not making a nuclear weapons and has not diverted any uranium to weapons grade. Israel on the other 200 nuclear weapons and is not monitored by the UN, which Iran is. So lets be clear does anyone care what Canada, thinks on the world stage anymore? Irrelevant.
0
0
Rating: 0

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.