How Benjamin Netanyahu and Stephen Harper could work together to defeat Barack Obama
Former British prime minister Tony Blair was often ridiculed as "George Bush's poodle".
In light of Canada's decision to shut its embassy in Iran and expel Iranian diplomats, perhaps it's time to question whether Prime Minister Stephen Harper has become Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's poodle.
Writing in the Jerusalem Post today, columnist Ben Caspit makes it clear that Netanyahu wants to attack Iran before the U.S. election on November 6. But he's not getting support from all of his governing coalition partners.
A simple Google search reveals numerous references to Netanyahu's wish to strike before the U.S. election.
However, the Israeli paper Haaretz has noted that American officials don't believe that Netanyahu will follow through on this.
So what would happen if Netanyahu surprised the U.S. government and Israel suddenly started firing missiles where it believes Iranian nuclear tests are occurring?
Iran would likely respond by shutting down supertanker movements through the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices would skyrocket. And the U.S. economy would be in trouble again at the worst possible time for the Democrats.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney could then reiterate his comment from the GOP convention that the Obama administration had "thrown Israel under the bus".
Romney might also point to how Canada had anticipated this situation by shutting down its embassy and booting Iranian officials out of the country, whereas the Obama administration did nothing.
It's a scary scenario to think that the Israeli prime minister might be willing to start a war to get rid of a U.S. president whom he personally dislikes. Of course, Netanyahu and Harper both know that a Republican administration would be far less critical of new Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Never underestimate how wily conservatives can be when there's an election on the line.
Richard Nixon and his friends engineered the Watergate Hotel break-in.
George W. Bush, Karl Rove, and their allies went to great lengths to suppress voter turnout in 2000 and 2004. There was even a book published about this called Was the 2004 presidential election stolen?.
Meanwhile, Canada is still coming to terms with the robocall scandal, where voters were directed to the wrong polling stations before the 2011 election.
In light of this history, it's not beyond the realm of possibility for Israel to launch a pre-election strike on Iran—with the Harpercons' support and encouragement—to boost Romney's chances in the presidential election.
Related story: Law professor Payam Akhavan questions Harper government's decision to close Tehran embassy
Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.





I can always count on you to jump in whenever I write anything that doesn't parrot the mainstream-media line about Stephen Harper.
Charlie
However, to paraphrase another commenter on another Straight article about Iran...did someone just write an article about foreign policy vis-a-vis Iran without mentioning Ahmadinejad? (Same answer both times: why, yes, someone just did.) The Iranian president has said some pretty terrifying things lately; it's not exactly a stretch for someone in a position of power to genuinely believe that Iran is a threat that needs to be dealt with somehow. One can argue compellingly against war while still recognizing the gravity of the situation. But I guess that if one thinks that Ahmadinejad doesn't even merit a mention in an article about the possibility of war with Iran, one has to resort to conspiracy theories in order to explain why anyone would support such a thing. And that makes the anti-war side a pretty soft target.
This is just a game played by Harper so he can score points with the future potential Romney administration. Harper is still pissed Obama shot down his pipeline across drinking water resevoires in the US and it's all of us that will pay dearly when Romney doesn't win, and the giant empire beside us remembers how Harper backstabbed them during the election with this petty stunt that ignores severe ramifications for prisoners on death row in Iran, and all their dual citizens living here.
Is robocalls a "conspiracy theory"? Was the Watergate break-in a "conspiracy theory"? Was the support for Pinochet's coup, which led to the death of an elected president in a democracy, a "conspiracy theory"? Were the Bay of Pigs or the Iran-Contra affair conspiracy theories?
I've concluded that Moebius is quite possibly a Conservative troll and maybe even a paid Conservative troll. Why else would he pay such attention to a writer with whom he regularly disparages as some sort of fool? But hey, that's probably just another conspiracy theory.
Charlie Smith
We've run several articles in the past about how repressive the Iranian regime is. Here are a few:
http://www.straight.com/article-327513/vancouver/book-reviews-flight-pat...
http://www.straight.com/article-262508/nazanin-afshinjam-iran-executes-j...
http://www.straight.com/article-69773/pageant-power-redux-nazanin-afshin...
http://www.straight.com/article/pageant-winner-promotes-progressive-revo...
http://www.straight.com/article-724676/vancouver/activist-tells-tale-two...
http://www.straight.com/article-637351/vancouver/video-iranian-women-cre...
http://www.straight.com/article-517426/vancouver/nikohl-boosheri-kissed-...
http://www.straight.com/article-448646/vancouver/vancouver-demonstrators...
Miguel
The possible threat of "them" having nuclear based electricity is unfathomable to Isreal's politicians.
If Iran builds a nuclear plant good for them. If Isreal wants to bully its way into starting WW III as fast as they can... bad for all of us.
Pages