Ken Charko: Making better decisions at city council and keeping taxes low

Comments

As the owner of the Dunbar Theatre, I understand what it means to make changes for the future and invest for tomorrow. For almost 80 years, Vancouverites have supported the theatre and honoured me with multiple awards. In return, I’ve recently invested significantly to improve their experience by installing the latest 3-D and digital film delivery technology and the best seats.

For more than 10 years now, the independent theatre owners in Vancouver (the Park, the Rio, the Ridge, Fifth Avenue) and the other independent theatres in the province, have elected me to represent them on the board of the Motion Picture Theatres Association of B.C., and that board has in turn elected me to serve as vice president of the association.

I’m also the president of the Golden Spoon Frozen Yogurt chain, and as we build 100 locations across Canada, I’ve had the opportunity to see first-hand how city halls across the country work, as well as some of the good ideas and good decisions they’ve implemented that Vancouver’s city council should consider.

My experience has taught me how to listen to all sides—small and large, loud and quiet—and how to find solutions that are inclusive and make better sense for Vancouver for the long term. My philosophy, and that of the NPA, is to be smart with our decisions, inclusive and considerate of all groups’ needs, and non-partisan. That is, after all, what the N and P stand for in NPA—Non-Partisan. As a city councillor, I would vote to make practical decisions that consider all options. Unfortunately, Mayor Gregor Robertson and Vision Vancouver have a history of railroading decisions that do not incorporate options and result in less-than-ideal “solutions” where one group of citizens is pitted against another. I think we can do better.

When we talk about city council making better decisions, let’s consider the decision to install separated bike lanes in the downtown core, for example, Hornby Street. First of all, I am in favour of the bike lanes. In fact, over the years, the NPA has installed over 400 kilometres of bike paths, lanes, and street allocations with very favourable results. Unfortunately, Mayor Robertson’s bike lane plan for downtown Vancouver pitted cyclists against motorists and pedestrians and cyclists against business owners. I believe seasonally separated bike lanes would meet more of Vancouverites’ needs. They would be available for cyclists, say from April 1 to September 30, and removed from October 1 to March 31, to make room for metered street parking. If we can configure the Lions Gate Bridge and the Massey tunnel to adjust for vehicle flow, certainly we can do the same for bike lanes.

If a different barrier system were used (as an example, four-foot-tall pylons imbedded into the road), the cost to make the change twice a year would be minimal and would be offset by continued parking meter income in the winter months, when auto traffic is highest and bike traffic is lowest. Cyclists would have the safety of the separated bike lanes during the time of the year when bike traffic is heaviest, and we would continue, as a city, to promote healthy living, promote alternatives to single-occupant cars, and reduce our carbon footprint.

By earning that extra parking meter income, this solution would also help keep property taxes at or below the rate of inflation. Low property taxes equal happier home owners, lower rents, and a more affordable city that we can all call home.

That is just one of the examples of how a better decision that incorporates options to meet the needs of the people of Vancouver can be made. I believe in smarter governance that incorporates options, embraces the needs of as many as possible, and does so in a fiscally sound way. Help me with your vote to make better decisions at city council.

Ken Charko is a Non-Partisan Association candidate for Vancouver city council.

Comments (15) Add New Comment
This is your "fix?"
Oh good, a compromise that makes nobody happy, and gives us ugly bollards every few feet (and what is the cost, exactly?). It's self-fulfilling too: what could be better to stop people from riding during the winter than /not having a bike lane/?

Ridership is trending way up - this winter we should see about as many trips as the painted lanes saw during the summer.

And Ken? You can't have a political party that's non-partisan. You /are/ partisan, just like you /are/ ideological. The rest of us just don't feel like pointing to a dictionary every time. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonpartisan
2
0
Rating: +2
Agustin
The only thing missing here is a coupon for a discount at this guy's frozen yogurt store. Or maybe that was included in the print version of the paper. (Clearly this is not a *news*paper.)

Ridiculous.
2
1
Rating: +1
Martin Dunphy
Agustin:

If you will read the header at the top of the page, you will see that this is not a news story but a self-penned commentary for the upcoming municipal election.
This has been published as a service for our readers, More than 40 other candidate statements can be found by clicking on highlighted text in the "Municipal Elections 2011" box found within the commentary.

Have a nice day.
2
0
Rating: +2
Richard Campbell
It is the NPA and other groups making a political issue out of the bike lanes that has pitted people against each other. Instead of fear mongering, the NPA could have educated businesses about the positive benefits of bike lanes for businesses in other cities and helped businesses adapt to the changes.

The NPA record on safe bike lanes for people of all ages is nothing to brag about. Ten years after the NPA approved the Bicycle Plan which promised several east west bike lanes across downtown, they had not even implemented one eastbound route. Then there is the dangerous lane on Burrard Street where cyclists are forced to cycle between trucks and buses. Thankfully there is Hornby now where people have a choice.

The NPA had almost two decades to find a solution for Burrard Bridge. They wasted millions on endless studies and still could not find a solution. Vision and COPE did in six months.

The suggestion of a seasonal bike lane is ridiculous. There are plenty of days in the fall and winter that are perfect for cycling like today. Lots of people are using the lane. And for safety reasons, the separated lanes are even more important in rainy and dark weather.
1
0
Rating: +1
got data?
Ken, as a starting point for considering the soundness of your proposal, got any numbers to show that there is excess demand for metered parking in downtown Vancouver? Excess supply is a waste of space and requires lowering the cost, which defeats the purpose of bringing in my income, after all. Has parking supply been inexorably deteriorated as a result of the bike lanes as they exist now to warrant considering this change?
1
0
Rating: +1
Arno S
The current council did a great job in providing safe and convenient separated bike paths on Burrard Bridge, Hornby and Dunsmuir. This has attracted many cyclists to the downtown core.

This is good for motorists since more cyclists means less cars and therefore less congestion on all the streets. Furthermore, research shows that motorists are now parking closer to their destinations on Hornby because they are using the off street parking. Also, neglibible effect is shown for driving times.

Bike lanes are good for business since the capacity of Hornby, for example, to move people by car and bike has doubled by installing the separated lanes. More people traffic means more customers. Also, cycling employees are more alert, more productive and take less sick leave.

More cyclists means less crowding on Transit.

Bike lanes provide a better pedestrian experience because pedestrians are now farther from moving cars on one side of the street and there are now less cyclists on the sidewalk

More people cycling means a healthier population, less noise, less pollution, less ghg emissions and a more vibrant and livable city.

I can't understand why everyone is not pushing for more separated bike lanes, especially all the council candidates.
1
0
Rating: +1
Rob Boyko
Charko is giving voters a chance to vote for someone who is looking to find reasonable solutions to our ever-increasing density and green-city goals..

That doesn't sound partisan to me - that sounds like good governance with a little fiscal responsibility thrown in..
1
1
Rating: 0
Matthew Ellis
Regarding your seasonal bike lanes, where do you expect me to ride on your 'off' season, given that I am a year round cyclist? In the middle of the lane on wet, dark mornings? How many cyclists would have to die before you would consider reinstating safe areas for commuting year round?
1
0
Rating: +1
Sandy Bowman
@ "This is your fix?"
Clearly the the NPA is a political organisation. I think they try to be non-partisan towards the provincial and federal governments and vancouver citizens; in Mr Charko's words: "inclusive and considerate".
I don't know how often they have succeeded at this endeavour, but you used the word the compromise in reference to Mr Charko' suggestion. If Mr Charko has not yet found a non-partisan solution, then he is coming close.
1
1
Rating: 0
C, Van Ihinger
We all need the dedicated bike lanes even more in winter than we do in summer.
- I need the lane so I can continue to ride my bike in winter.
- Fellow cyclists need the safety in numbers that occurs when drivers see, and adjust for, lots of bikes on the street year round.
- Bus commuters need that extra seat that I make available when I ride my bicycle in winter.
- My employer needs the lane in winter so that I arrive at work alert and fit after a 30 minute cycling workout.
- Every single car that passes me in winter needs the dedicated bike lane so that he does not have to slow to my speed when the right hand side of the lane is full of debris, snow, and flooded rain sewers.
- Car commuters need the bike lane so that I can leave my car parked at home, freeing up car spaces for those who cannot cycle to work.
- Bus commuters need the bike lane so that their buses can move faster along dedicated bus/bike lanes.
- The many tourist and restaurant businesses along Hornby need the dedicated bike lanes as drawing cards. They also need the attractive planters that come with the bike lanes, since bollards are just plain ugly.
- Street parkers need the dedicated bike lane so that they don't need to compete for parking spaces with me and fellow cyclists who leave their cars at home.
- Pedestrians need that extra buffer space between themselves and rush hour traffic while walking alongside the dedicated bike lanes.
- Motorists need the extra space between their splashy wheels and the pedestrians' dry-cleanable rainwear.
- Everyone who breathes in downtown Vancouver needs less air pollution, that invisible side benefit when lots of people leave their cars parked and take the bike.
- Everyone who listens in downtown Vancouver needs less noise pollution, that other invisible side benefit when the loudest sound on the block is the whisper of bicycle chains in sprockets.
1
0
Rating: +1
canadianveggie
So you want to throw cyclists into traffic during the wettest and darkest months of the year?

The downtown separated lanes are showing huge year-over-year increases in cycling volume. On Dunsmuir, bike traffic is up 17% in July, 43% in August, and 62% in September. The October numbers will be out in the next 2 weeks, and we'll likely see large increases again.

Yes, more people bike in the summer, but Vancouver is bikable year-round (except maybe the handful of days it snows in the city). Bike to Work Week just started yesterday, but Mr. Charko doesn't think anyone should bike past September 30.

Sources:
http://spacingvancouver.ca/2011/09/26/vancouver%E2%80%99s-separated-bike...
http://canadianveggie.wordpress.com/2011/10/12/vancouvers-separated-bike...
2
0
Rating: +2
Dude Chumley
Crazy! He just doesn't get it does he?

Winter, when visibility is low, is when the separated lanes are needed even more than the rest of the year.

The reason when the NPA put in bike lanes and didn't have problems is because the corporate news media had a different demon to pick on back then. Since then they've chosen cyclists to blame everything on. In two years it'll be somebody else. Just wait.

He sounds like he means well but is making some assumptions and thinking up "solutions" that just won't work. He claims to see what's happening in other cities. Hasn't he noticed bike lanes popping up all over and being good things there too?
And how is having a bunch of open houses, listening to constituents, having a unanimous vote passed "railroading"?
I guess he read a few Vancouver Sun editorials and thinks there's a constituency that he can attract. My vote is going to someone who understands what's going on, not someone who is this out of touch.
1
0
Rating: +1
Richard Campbell
Hey Ken

A great video! Kid reporter Tia, 9, reports on the Good Green News in the city of Vancouver. In this episode she investigates bike lanes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUC6MOz13wA&feature=youtu.be

1
0
Rating: +1
Matt F
I just drove by the dedicated bike lanes and there was no one in the bike lane...on the other hand traffic was backed up. I don't fully understand Ken's position but at least he's proposing something and started the conversation.We need more dooers not complainers!
2
0
Rating: +2
GZLFB
Sadly this looks like he wrote a draft and then some other campaign worker(s) interjected a moderation that made things more confusing and much more horrid in the end. I don't think one person wrote this.
I think if one wants safe biking they need an English like country side, not a city. Learn how to ride. Also, be a good driver or sell the car. Get the bad mufflers off the street. Ban Trans Ams to prevent gay bashing. Alright that may seem like car choice profiling. No lanes work out. It either bothers people walking, or people driving. Vision managed both. Oh and Bus riders who have to wait for the cyclist to put up his healthy and useful green travel up on the Bus slowing it's progress. Man not even a toll on bike lanes?
"fix" I found myself amused when I saw a NPA flyer at a debate, seeing it saying "Our NPA..." How can their be a Our Non-Partisan. Guys admit it, be honest, call it the Vancouver BC (neo) Liberals. It's a shame this apparent fiscal conservative couldn't post that; talk of less Government and Capitalism. Getting government out of the way of job creating business. I will repeat what I wrote in my own, it would be better if the media interviewed us and slate caucus leaders/spokesmen (for time). Although there would be more time if Occupy Vancouver, I suspect the establishment used OV to lessen election coverage. Suits incumbency.
1
0
Rating: +1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.