National chief incumbent Shawn Atleo faces seven challengers in AFN election next week

Comments

When First Nations chiefs from across the country participate in a vote for national chief of the Assembly of First Nations next Wednesday (July 18), the ballot will be a historic one.

Incumbent Shawn Atleo, looking for his second three-year term, faces seven challengers in the run for the AFN’s top position, including two regional chiefs and an unprecedented four female candidates.

Atleo is facing criticism from some of these opponents, such as Mi’kmaq lawyer and academic Pam Palmater, who argues the organization should be taking a stronger stance against the Harper government.

The candidate, who heads the Centre for Indigenous Governance at Ryerson University, said she decided to run for national chief “for the cause”.

“In the last couple of years, the degree to which the AFN failed to address or even try to resist the assimilatory agenda that the Conservative government is trying to impose on First Nations really made me kind of sit back and think that I’ve got to do something,” she told the Georgia Straight by phone.

Palmater conceded it’s important for the advocacy organization to have a good relationship with government. However, she argued that the current situation is more of an “abusive” association.

“Right now, we’re in an abusive relationship with government, where Harper is calling all of the shots, not leaving any options, no room for negotiation, funding cuts across the board, and more paternalistic legislation instead of less,” she claimed.

The candidate added her greatest concern is what she called the “crisis”—or, in some cases, multiples crises—that some First Nations communities are facing, including lack of potable water or sanitation infrastructure, flooding, and inadequate housing.

According to Palmater, the solutions to these crises are recognition of First Nations jurisdiction and equitable funding.

“We’re funded at far lower rates across the board than provincial residents who don’t have aboriginal treaty rights that are constitutionally protected,” she said.

“If we had just a small fraction of our lands and resources, we wouldn’t even be talking about federal support,” she added. “We would be self-sustaining governments, which is what we want.”

Lawyer Joan Jack of the Berens River First Nation in Manitoba is also focusing on the state of the relationship between First Nations and the Canadian government.

“The issue is that Canada is benefitting and we’re not, and we’re in a dysfunctional relationship with the Canadian state, where our state of victimization maintains the status quo,” she contended.

Jack wants to see a more coordinated approach between the national chief and the Assembly of First Nations executive.

“People, when they watch a football game, they know the name of the quarterback but they also know the names of the linebackers and they know other people are famous on the team—and that’s not the case right now,” she said.

“For me, I would put much more emphasis on decentralizing…and looking at what’s different in their regions and what do they need, rather than centralizing it for the convenience of the Canadian state, looking for common interests—because that’s what the Canadian state wants to do.”

In Anishinaabe lawyer Diane Kelly’s view, listening to the “grassroots voice” is a key step for the AFN.

“I think what’s really happening here is that we need to take a new approach to dealing with government, we need to take a new approach to dealing with industry, and we need to take a new approach to dealing with other organizations and corporations,” she told the Straight by phone.

“We’re at a critical juncture here, where we could just fall off and do the status quo and issue press releases, or do we really draw in all those voices, all of those views and aspirations, because what it’s really about is people want hope.”

Ellen Gabriel, a Mohawk activist and the former president of the Quebec Native Women’s Association, is also calling for a stronger voice from the national leadership against the Conservative government. The candidate has been involved in advocacy for 22 years, ever since she was chosen as the spokesperson for her community of Kanehsatà:ke during the Oka Crisis.

“Indigenous people need a very strong voice—a diplomatic voice, but a strong voice, which I think has been missing slightly the last few years,” she said.

“We’re fighting against this huge machinery that seems to promote more the rights of corporations and development while we’re negotiating long-standing agreements about our lands and territories,” she added.

“For me, when there’s silence from an aboriginal organization that is supposed to be advocating for our rights…then I think there needs to be someone that can step up to the plate and criticize the government, regardless of whether there’s a threat of funding cuts.”

Staff of incumbent Atleo said he was travelling in remote areas and not available for an interview with the Straight. During a candidates debate aired on the Aboriginal People’s Television Network Thursday (July 12), the national chief also directed some of his comments at the federal government.

"This government, like all governments before it, has failed to uphold the honour of the Crown," he said. "And, collectively, we have to compel governments to step forward and recognize this."

According to Mohawk scholar Taiaiake Alfred , this year’s race for national chief is unprecedented in its inclusion of candidates that are challenging the current system.

The University of Victoria professor claims that candidates Palmater and Gabriel are drawing attention to what he called the “unacceptable” politics related to electing a national chief, and the structure of the AFN.

“You have people who really have no place in that system coming forward to make a stand against it...and saying, 'Hey we need a kind [of] and level of representation as First Nations people in this country that is authentic and that represents the grassroots,' ” he told the Straight by phone.

"The message that [Palmater is] putting forward, along with Ellen Gabriel, is that what we need to do is return to a position of advocating for our rights collectively as nations and people.”

The other candidates in the AFN election are Bill Erasmus, who is the regional AFN chief for the Northwest Territories, George Stanley, the regional chief for Alberta, and Terrance Nelson, the vice chairman of the American Indian Movement.

Countrywide, 633 chiefs are eligible to vote in the July 18 election.

Comments (8) Add New Comment
Sheeple
Palmater...this chick is an academic? wow...is it a revelation to her that there are "crisis" on first nations such as Water & Housing?

R u kidding me? Babe...this has been going on since the British, French and the Hudson Bay Company formed what was to become present day Canada.

Chief Atleo wants to resolve this as much as any pretender to the Chiefs Chair...don't blame Atleo...blame the Canadian Government.
2
3
Rating: -1
Martin Dunphy
Sheeple:

Some careful reading, and a little respect, may be in order.
Pam Palmater never told the Straight that the crises you reference were a "revelation".
This "chick", or "babe" merely acknowledged their continued existence and offered her solution in terms of First Nations jurisdiction and funding, as befits a candidate for that position in the AFN.
And I'm sure that Palmater, a Mi'kmaq lawyer and academic, doesn't need you to explain the history of her people to her.
3
3
Rating: 0
Wawmeesh
Palmater is doing in this election what journalists and columnists should have been doing all along: consistently questioning, challenging and holding the incumbent accountable. As well, there's been no analysis and questioning of policy decisions, platforms, or campaign funding and spending. Lastly, only scant mention - the fact at the end of the story - about the key issue the AFN will face and it isn't the Harper government. Namely, only 633 chiefs get to vote for the national leader. The one million aboriginal people in the country who are impacted by AFN policy and advocacy don't have a vote.
2
2
Rating: 0
Tim Palmer
I greatly respect Pam Palmater for delivering a complex message that has dire implications. All the more remarkably, she does this in a clear and straightforward way. She is not calling attention to herself. She is not spouting anyone else's dogma. She is not claiming any special authority.

Her authority lies in simply speaking the truth so that others may hear. Unfortunately, this requires that they be listening...

She seems to have a very good handle on the dangers of, for example, tempting people with individual rights to land as a way of gaining control of what is now part of First Nations sovereign territory. This is very appealing bait for people who have heard the message over and over that they are worthless because they own nothing. What private ownership will grant them is the obligation to pay taxes that they cannot afford. As a result, while property rights is the 'gift' they may think they are receiving, what they are actually getting is a nice looking lure with a big hook hidden in it. When they cannot pay their taxes, the land ownership will simply be reeled in by the taxing authority.

Presto! Now you REALLY have nothing!

These kinds of strategies seem to be OK with the existing leadership.

Why is that?

What kind of salt-lick have they been invited to enjoy that they are now bringing their people and their communities along with them? Now that hunting season has come...

What has broken the sacred trust of their leadership?

There is a much carefully drawn illusion at work here. The pea is not under the shell that they want you to think it is under! Pam Palmater not only sees it clearly, she is able to speak it out in a way that makes it plain to others.

So listen, please. Learn. Pull the veil away from your eyes. Clear your mind of the deceiving web the vast, corporate marketing machine has woven there.

And when you see those who do not listen, or continue to speak out against noble leaders like Ms Palmater, ask WHY? Why are they instead waxing and polishing the boots of the forces that are alighning against the Indigenous Peoples? Against all of the 99%-ask WHY?

What is their motivation? Have they been corrupted by promises of wealth, fame and/or power of some kind? Some kind of special treatment when the New Order has come and the old, sacred order is overthrown?

This is an old story. It is a flock of painted painted decoys like those that have been used over and over and over again by the colonizers and the corporateers.

And it is now waterfowl season...the Tar Sands table has been laid for feasting!

Please do not take this kind of bait again!

Those of you who have donned the paint and feathers of the decoys, please remember who you are.

Remember who you are harming!
2
3
Rating: -1
Tim Palmer
Why women are excellent candidates for Chiefs:

In 2006 the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Muhammed Yunus for the concept of microfinancing. Mr. Yunus started this idea by giving very small loans of a few dollars, up to maybe $20, of his own money to very poor people. What he discovered was that this tiny amount could make the difference between being in hock all your life to loan sharks so you could buy, say ,reeds to make baskets, and successfully running your own tiny business. It made an enourmous difference in quality of life! And every one of those initial loans was repaid in full!

Bankers had always said that loaning money to such people could never work because they would always default. Mr. Yunus discovered that they almost never did. Now an entire, new banking system has evolved!

One important thing was learned however. In order for this to work, loans are really only given to WOMEN (say, 98% of the time.)

• Do you want to know why?

Because when the money was loaned to men, they spent it on something for themselves. Jewelry. Liquor. Prostitutes, maybe.

But women were very concerned to use this resource to better the condition of their families. They were motivated by the welfare of their children--not themselves!

Do you think that this realization might have something to say about why it could be better to have one of these female candidates as Chief?

Is it possible they might be more likely to think about what will be best for the next seven generations of children rather than what could be in it for themselves?

There was great wisdom in the traditional way of choosing who to groom as possible, future Chiefs--it was the savvy mothers who could see which children had the best potential.

A wise man will pay close attention to what a good woman is saying to him. He will consider it carefully.

This may be an opportunity to put that kind of great, traditional wisdom back into play!
3
3
Rating: 0
N/a
well after a quick read here always old story new news... here at play" canadian government is at fault no matter who leads the way for me or you... they lead you into disscussions and tell you how it will be,nothing ever truly gets done in my eyes. if it did we wouldnt have an old story new news situation at play! happens more often then any of us would like. no matter who votes for who I would like to say if i could vote for someone but it just simply wouldnt matter... at this point and looking back on the past and no one can really answere the Why so whats the point? someone educate me on this one...then" too many years how many elected and always the same outcome and always the same questions... just a new face to the media and no answeres.
2
2
Rating: 0
JoeSask
Most chiefs are accused of corruption where I come from. Why is it the chiefs are the only ones that get to vote in this very imortant election? We also don't get a vote in the provincial elections too, namely FSIN. This is where the problem lies when it ciomes to aboriginal politics.
3
2
Rating: +1
Rene
There is no "Aboriginal community" that is of one fabric. This is a population of many different cultures and languages and interests who come together because of the colonization and the Indian Act which continues to operationalizes it. The National Indian Brotherhood aka the Assembly of First Nations was a means to counter that process. The tipping point could well be now alright when the AFN reinvents itself into an Assembly of Indigenous Peoples which would be very interesting alright. It might be tough for the traditionalists if labor in the tar sands is going to be American Army reservists because they have the skills.....and edge Aboriginal people out of the economy further... perhaps Taiaiake Alfred can speak to something like that. ...3 terms for Phil during the Phat times were due to the relationship with the Liberals when they were in office....Atleo has made the work with the grassroots, children, youth, women, business, environmentalists, internationalists, UN, and on and on ...he has been doing look like a cake walk...which is why there are so many running....3 more years of Harper have yet to be weathered....
2
3
Rating: -1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.