NPA campaigns on bringing “common sense” back to Vancouver city hall

Comments

On a recent morning, a neatly dressed gentleman was quietly handing out flyers at an East Vancouver SkyTrain station.

The papers could have been for about just anything, but it turned out that person was Francis Wong, vice president of the Vancouver Chinatown Business Improvement Area Society.

Wong is a candidate for city council with the Non-Partisan Association, and he was distributing campaign material for the right-of-centre party.

The flyer’s message was very simple.

It starts by saying that with all the “wacky ‘greenwashing’ gimmicks” of the current Vision Vancouver administration of Mayor Gregor Robertson, such as backyard chickens and growing of wheat on front lawns, “there’s something missing at City Hall”.

“It’s called common sense,” the flyer reads. “It’s the kind of common sense that your NPA team wants to bring back to City Council, Park Board and School Board on November 19. The same common sense that respects your tax dollars and values your priorities as we work to build a better Vancouver for everyone.”

It refers to the NPA team of the party’s mayoral aspirant Suzanne Anton as the “Common Sense Team”.

It remains to be seen whether or not the NPA’s messaging on the theme of common sense will catch on among voters.

The NPA sounds confident it will. The flyer’s message concludes: “Like you, and more and more Vancouverites, we know it’s time for some common sense.”

Comments (55) Add New Comment
MarkBowen
Hopefully they have something more to offer in that platform other than just slagging Vision. I've yet to hear a peep about what they actually promise to do for us. And I am willing to listen!
1
1
Rating: 0
James G
I don't buy it. The East Side is in play this time though, so he is campaigning in the right neighborhood.
Meanwhile, the inspiration for the Vision philosophy on homelessness and traffic issues has been found:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNfGyIW7aHM
0
1
Rating: -1
Paul T
What a novel approach to civic governance, 'common-sense'. That's something we haven't seen in almost 3 years here in Vancouver. Time for silly season at city hall to end!
1
0
Rating: +1
?
The NPA is the Rob Ford of Vancouver politics all they want is to take Vancouver backwards.

They have no vision.
1
1
Rating: 0
MarkBowen
I'm not sure why my original comment is being voted down. If you don't like Vision, that's fine! But don't you want to see some actual substance to the NPA's platform?

Like I said, I'm genuinely interested, but it takes more then just "we are not the other guys" to get my vote... And I hope it does for you as well downvoters.

Just remember that Toronto has been kind enough to demonstrate for us exactly what you can get if you vote someone in based on sloganeering and little else.
1
0
Rating: +1
Jason
I would rather have a government with conviction. Where was Anton's common sense when she voted in favor of these "wacky greenwashing gimmicks"? I guess they just need a couple hours to kick in...
0
0
Rating: 0
?
The reason your comment was voted down is because most rational people know that the NPA has no substance.

They also realize that Vision has actually been doing a very good job and should be reelected.

Whoever is in charge always has the most crap thrown at them it is the nature of modern politics.
1
1
Rating: 0
Freddie Heartline
I met Mr. Wong at a NPA pub event a month ago and altho he was by far the best dressed person in the room, he unfortunately had left his Bluetooth in his ear all night so it was difficult to take him seriously.

I agree with the person that stated that the NPA are the Rob Fords of our local political scene.

I have met almost all of the NPA candidates for city council and I know a couple of them personally and beyond Sean Bickerton - I can not in good conscience recommend any of them to any intelligent or concerned voter.

Beyond Mr. Bickerton, the NPA city council candidates simply lack intelligence.
Suzanne Anton, as much (as I would probably enjoy drinking wine with her in her garden) is old and tired and her background as a prosecuting attorney unfortunately has affected her ability to rationalize and compromise on matters beyond her agenda.

For instance, the NPA lack vision on:
-the wheat issue - they cannot seem to grasp the importance of public school students learning first hand how much energy and resources it takes to make a loaf of bread from start to finish.
-the chickens thing - somewhere hundreds to thousands of km's away is a huge aluminum barn stuffed with chickens crammed into little cages crapping all over one another day in and day out every day of their lives, being fed who knows what to make our breakfast eggs. Sorry, it makes perfect sense to me to allow Vancouverites the option of producing their own at home.
-the water meter issue - it has been empirically proven across the world that metering lowers consumption patterns yet Ms Anton voted against the policy.
-the bike lane thing - omg, seriously - people the separated bike lanes are a GOOD thing for this city. I was in London UK in May for the Royal Wedding and holy crap riding a bicycle in that city (London has unseparated bike lanes) is almost a death wish. We should be very thankful we have them here. Whole families use them.
-the riot issue - when I met Ms. Anton shortly after the riot, I said to her "wow, it sure looks like you and your team sure stand to gain from that event." - and indeed she has milked that issue almost continuously since.

It would be a backward move to vote these people into council -and it would be embarrassing.

Mayor Robertson and City Council are doing a stand-up job putting Vancouver into a leadership position globally and setting the city on course for long-term success well into the future.
1
1
Rating: 0
Taxpayers R Us
I don't care who brings the message, Vision has been leading Vancouver on a train wreck since they took office.

If it's the NPA who unseats them (or at the very least grabs enough seats to make this a democratic city again), fine.

Regardless, the message is sound. We're in serious need of some renewed control of city hall before the developers become our new lords.

1
1
Rating: 0
James G
In the upcoming money fight between these two nasty developer parties, I will ONLY vote for the COPE candidates and urge everyone else to do the same. Anyone in Hastings Sunrise who votes for Vision is asking for their main streets to be turned into highways with commuter gridlock. I have been betrayed by the destructive Vision agenda and won't again vote against my neighborhood by supporting their plan to demolish the viaducts nor ride the developer wrecking ball by voting NPA.

I do hope that there is no majority and that the next council includes neither Green Chicken Reimer nor any free range Meggs.
1
1
Rating: 0
Glissando Remmy
The Thought Of The Night

"Irony (def): Going to work by bike to $ave on $hoe$; pull the "ManOfThePeople" routine for the Vancouver $ucker'$ benefit, all while claiming Full Tran$portation Allowance, and dining in Ko$her $urrounding$ according to and in great ob$ervance of the Hollyhocki$h tradition."

NPA F#$%ing Hacks...Costly Renos...Divorced bike lanes... Cronyism... Nepotistic Hiring... On and on and on and on and on and on...

If these Vision punks are back in orifice after the November Election and if Gregorovitch Riotson will still be showing his crooked mug around the City Hall's vegetable garden I'm off to Jamaica... and why not, let them pretty women... steal my money instead!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf5IP8r0gWk

We live in Vancouver and this keeps us busy.
1
1
Rating: 0
Taxpayer
Simple plan. Fix what Vision has done wrong. Fix the semi disaster of Olympic Village (why are residents paying TWO - on public and one private - utility bills?), get rid of the bike lanes (that alone would give a landslide of support to the NPA if they made it issue #1) in their current form (they were "test lanes"...the tests are over), do some real consultation over the course of the next civic term and put the entire bike lane issue to binding referendum (and include upfront costs to put the lanes in permanantly) in the 2014 civic election. While I'm no city planner, if (IF) we vote for bike lanes, doesnt' Granville Bridge/Granville street make more sense than Hornby and Burrard Bridge? Granville is already mostly car free (Granville Mall) and for over a year it was also Bus free with little transit/traffic flow problem. Seems like a nobrainer. Granville mall merchants are already used to depending on foot traffic not car traffic for their business so it won't hurt businesses like it has on Hornby. Problem solved.

Rethink the Vision plan to build high rises in the DTES, displacing long term residents (Mr Mayor - moving the homeless problem to another neighbourhood won't "fix homelessness" as you promised).

Halt the ridiculously ambitious (aka ridiculously EXPEN$IVE for you and me...hey, Robertson's a multimillionaire fruit drink mogul...maybe HE should pay for it) Green Plan that seems to serve no real purpose than bragging rights against other cities. We are already one of the greenest cities in North America (I can only think of Portland as greener on the Pacific Coast and maybe we're about equal with San Fran).

Rethink Vancouver's support for the Evergreen line. Not nearly as much a benefit to Vancouver city proper as the Canada Line and will cause a huge rise in gas and/or property taxes. Coquitlam wants the Evergreen line, they should pay for the bulk of it not dump the costs on Vancouver.

All in all, you can build a whole election campaign JUST fixing everything Vision has done wrong in the last 3 short years. It's like when the NDP took power provincially. They WRECKED the economy in one term and it took the better part of the next term to fix all they did wrong. We put Vision/Robertson back in, they will go Hog Wild with their foolish, EXPENSIVE (more gas taxes, more property taxes) pie in the sky plans.
1
1
Rating: 0
Justavoter
I'm with James G. We have two parties (Vision and NPA) who are competing as to who can sell Vancouver to developers the fastest. I suggest voting for independents, COPE and anyone else who still has a distant concept of democracy. What we really need is new party based on an agglomeration of the all the community groups in the city.
1
0
Rating: +1
Chet
Remember what Sam Sullivan brought to Vancouver politics - piles of garbage & no intervention. Thanks but no thanks ! Where was Anton then ? Siding with the "Creme de la Creme"
1
0
Rating: +1
Freddie Heartline
Hey "Taxpayer" - I can tell by your writing style and your rhetoric who you are. Why hide yourself behind a pseudonym? NPA hack.

The NPA lack intellect - I already said that. I'd like to add integrity to that list please.

Thank you.
1
1
Rating: 0
Dave Pasin
It is interesting to read the same comments posted here as on other sites.

As an NPA candidate for Park Board I can tell you that I and all my running mates dramatically differ with our Vision counterparts.

We differ on fundemental issues such as:
Governance, funding, staffing and hours of operation of Community Centres
Proper funding of programs and staff to run various programs
Cutting the Grass and properly maintaining gardens, plants and trees
Picking up garbage in parks
Properly maintaining our parks, pools, streets, boulevards
Funding the Park Board to do it's job
Keeping washrooms open
Ongoing consultative planning of Dog Parks and dog related programs
Funding of new parks and facilities
Being vocal and strong advocates for Park Board issues to the Mayor, Council and City Manager.

I could go on but I think the point is made.

If you feel that that Vision has done a good job of running thePark Board no matter how much more than the $5.2 million they have already cut, it won't matter to you.

However, ask yourself this, are YOUR parks, Community Centres programs better than they were 3 years ago? Do you get better service from your Park Board?

I am proud to say that over the past year and half the NPA has been listening to neighbourhoods and community groups throughout the City.
The issues, comments and needs of a wide community of people from all across the political spectrum have been listened to and are being taken into account.

As we get closer to the fall and lection time you will see the roll out of these consultations as part of the NPA's election policy program.

For those that wish to slam go ahead, but for those who want to see real differences of thoughts for the future of our City between COPE, VISION and the NPA stay tuned. I am confident those with a genuially open mind will be pleasantly surprised.




0
1
Rating: -1
ursa minor
Everything I need to know about Common Sense (TM), I learned from Mike Harris when the Tories gutted health care and education in Ontario while poisoning the people of Walkerton with their own drinking water.

The NPA are cut from the same reactionary thug cloth. I didn't see any common sense in trying to criminalize homelessness through 'Project Civil City', abandoning the Four Pillars approach to Vancouver's drug problem, picking protracted fights with the City's own employees, and trying to shove as many people into East Vancouver through the 'Eco-Density' strategy while making sure their affluent West Side supporters didn't have to put up with any new neighbours.

So, when does Greg R. Robertson declare his candidacy for Mayor?...
0
1
Rating: -1
James G
The partisans are at the gates my friends!

You can tell when irrelevant provincial political history (Ontario, BC) gets dragged into the fray.

This issue is has Vision lived up to their promises? The answer is a very loud "NO!"

Make your decisions as you will. Mine is to plump for the COPE candidates, who voted with Vision far less than the NPA did. That is just fact, not spin.
0
1
Rating: -1
Freddie Heartline
I disagree James G - Vision has done almost everything they have set out to do.

Some of their successes include:

-the greening the city and moving it towards being global Green Capital
-bike lanes installed
-homelessness is down to record lows
-working very aggressively towards increasing the supply of housing in the city
-dealing progressively with transit issues within the city
-opening the level of community interaction and dialogue to hitherto unknown levels with their town hall and social media programs
-listened to the people and acted in accordance on issues like the casino and falun gongers
-the safe injection site is a success

Compared to the legacy that Sam Sullivan left behind, Vision is doing a fantastic job... like super fantastic.

Me and many others are super proud of this city. There is no joke here. Vancouver is internationally renowned and respected and it's not because we have conservatives at the helm - it is our progressive mode that produces the approval ratings.

We don't need an old hawk and her hens at wheel of this town.

Gregor is young, grounded, forward looking, a successful man and family and community oriented man - and great mayor.

His team is a solid, they have vision and the fortitude to get things done in a manner that will keep this city growing and bearing fruit for generations to come.
1
0
Rating: +1
?
Vision isn't listening to the minority of conservative NPA "hacks" that are trying to yell louder then everyone else. They are listening to the majority of Vancouver residents who are strongly supportive of what they have accomplished in three short years while dealing with the Olympics and a recession.

I am looking forward to three more years of progressive leadership from Vision/COPE.

Whatever the NPA was in the past all they are now is a breeding ground for Neo-Conservatism.

If you like Rob Ford style politics then the NPA is your party.
0
1
Rating: -1

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.