Radiation tests urged for sockeye salmon

Comments

Marine biologistAlexandra Morton sees a need to test returning sockeye salmon for radiation from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster.

Poll

Should sockeye salmon be tested for radiation from Japan’s nuclear disaster?

Yes 93%
223 votes
No 7%
18 votes

“There was a large release of radioactive material in the water and in the air,” Morton told the Straight in a phone interview from her home on Malcolm Island. “I suspect that this generation of sockeye were out of the way, probably on their way home. But my sense of this is we need to test everywhere we can. As soon as I heard about this, I covered my gardens. I suspect that government doesn’t know how to deal with this, and in the face of it they just don’t want us to know.”

An estimated four million sockeye have started coming back to the Fraser River, and people in the fishing industry are catching them.

Ernie Crey, fisheries advisor to the Sto:lo Tribal Council, agrees with Morton. “I think it’s a practical idea,” Crey told the Straight by phone. Asked if the returning fish are safe, he said: “I don’t know. This is a good question.”

However, Crey doesn’t expect the federal government to go ahead and test salmon for radiation. “That’s not something DFO [Fisheries and Oceans Canada] is going to voluntarily do or Health Canada or Environment Canada,” he said.

Responding by email to a query by the Straight, Fisheries and Oceans spokesperson Lara Sloan wrote that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency “would be responsible for deciding what fish for consumption would need to be tested for food safety”.

CFIA spokesperson Mark Clarke said the agency could not comment by the Straight ’s deadline.

According to Morton, sockeye are known to go as far out as the Bering Sea, and from there, swim back across the Pacific Ocean. “So they have to turn homewards at some point…but also they’re right out in the open Pacific…and they go on a big circle there,” she said. “They’re eating plankton that’s eating smaller things.”

Comments (3) Add New Comment
Birdy
Alexandra and Ernie should get a group of people together who share this concern, and raise money to pay a university to do the testing. Plenty of people would chip in voluntarily for an unbiased private test. The government is not going to change their mind, so pleading is just a waste of time. Even if the government did test the salmon, who in their right mind would trust their results?
1
0
Rating: +1
Jaquilyn
Wonder if Greenpeace could be interested? Tuna is also at the top of the food chain. Fish swim everywhere. Big deal to people who eat fish. Locally, alaska pollock could be tested also.
0
0
Rating: 0
Bruce Conway
"The radiation found in B.C. was carried by the jet stream, and is now falling over the West Coast with rain, which is mixing with sea water and accumulating in seaweed, SFU said in a news release."

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Radiation+from+Japan+reactor+detected+s...

Two words we tend to forget: bioaccumulation, biomagnification.

Another word: rainfall. Canada has been getting high levels in rainfall for five months now Toronto also has high levels around the Great Lakes. Rain has a habit of falling into the ocean. It also gets taken back up as clouds and more rainfall.

Fish swim in that ocean. With millions of gallons (documented, and undocumented) going into the ocean I would guess everybody had best stay away from fish - forever - given the half lives of some of the over 250 isotopes which have spilled - including Cesium-137 which will be around for 300 years.

Perhaps what the government is not telling us is that readings don't matter anymore, and that we should all look for signs of leukemia within 5 years, and we're going to get it from rainfall, ocean, salmon, soil, imported cars, people, birds, insects and air.
0
1
Rating: -1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.