Rogers Communications challenges false advertising lawsuit with freedom of expression

Comments

A case between the Competition Bureau and Rogers Communications Inc. resumed in an Ontario court Tuesday (August 7). In November 2010, the Competition Bureau—an independent law enforcement agency that oversees Canadian businesses and consumers— filed a lawsuit against the Canadian telecommunications company on the basis of false advertising in its 2010 Chatr campaign.

According to advertisements and marketing campaigns, Rogers claimed that Chatr subscribers had “fewer dropped calls than new wireless carriers” and had “no worries about dropped calls”. However, the Competition Bureau asserted that Rogers did not conduct adequate or proper tests on its product or have fact-based evidence available in order to make this claim. Thus, the bureau asked the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to order Rogers to pay a $10 million penalty, pay restitution to affected customers, stop the Chatr advertisements, and issue a public apology.

According to Postmedia News, Rogers, however, is challenging the case, arguing that regulations on claims made in advertisements and marketing campaigns go against its right to freedom of expression as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The company is asking Ontario court to eradicate a principle in the Competition Act that requires companies to test products prior to making claims about them in advertisements.

This is the first time that a provision in the Competition Act has been challenged in Canada and could mean a change in the way companies advertise products in Canada if Rogers is successful.

You can follow Michelle da Silva on Twitter at twitter.com/michdas.

Comments (8) Add New Comment
jonny .
A company is not a person, and should not have the same rights as a person.

Companies, news, and politicians should not be allowed to lie or mislead the public.
3
1
Rating: +2
What The Fudge
Freedom of expression and making false claims are two completely different things... Rogers does not have a case.
3
2
Rating: +1
Noknok
What Rogers is claiming is that the Charter gives them the right to lie and to make unsubstantiated claims. A very "interesting" interpretation of the freedom of expression.
1
3
Rating: -2
e.a.f.
Rogers is making an interesting argument. However, it is not in the best interest of the consumers in Canada if they were to be successful. We have laws to protect consumers & one of those is companies can't make false claims. Rogers is trying to save $10M in fines but the expense to Canadians could be incalcable. If "lying" became fair game in advertising, people could make all sorts of claims regarding the life span of cars, what their medicines could do, that a cleaner which contained poison in fact was good for you, that ingredients which were not good for your health could be advertised as not being unhealth.etc. Some thing along the line of "eat 10 big macs aday & loose weight. drink lots of pop, its good for your blood sugar. It could be very dangerous for consumers. Of course Rogers doesn't care about the citizens of Canada, simply their bottom line.
2
1
Rating: +1
Jeff Long

If this their legal argument I would say to Rogers.

"You need new a lawyer."
2
1
Rating: +1
Axel
I'll be looking for a new carrier I think.

Rewarding companies like this for their "efforts" in trying to swindle the Canadian public is not something I want to be a part of.

Perhaps the Judge should say that he "lied" about the fine being $10 million. He should tell them the its $100 million instead, as he raises his turned hand, pinky extended to the side of his mouth.
2
1
Rating: +1
Stephen B. Coulson
Fraud is intentional deception for gain or to the detriment of others. False advertising is clearly fraud. Is fraud just free expression? If so then who is to say that hanging of corrupt executives from lamp posts isn't just a form of speech? Is this a legal theory we really want to pursue?
2
2
Rating: 0
Vcouverfan
I recently upgraded Iphone 5 with Rogers. Per their advertising, the plan is including Unlimited Text, Picture, Video Messages, but when you sent picture message or video message, it will use your data. If your data is used up, you will pay for extra for the picture or video messaging. It is really only unlimited text massaging, not unlimited picture or video messaging at all. It is seriously very misleading and it is totally a false advertising. I contacted their customer service. They insist this is how the picture and video messaging works and it is not false advertising. However, I am very disappointed with their reaction and will definitely not using their service anymore.
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.