Sensible B.C. campaign seeks referendum on marijuana decriminalization in 2014

Comments

A group of pot-legalization advocates has launched a campaign seeking a referendum on marijuana reforms in B.C.

Poll

Do you want to see B.C. hold a referendum on marijuana decriminalization in 2014?

Yes 95%
646 votes
No 4%
29 votes
Undecided 1%
6 votes

Sensible B.C. plans to build support for a provincewide initiative vote in 2014, following the signature-gathering process used by the Fight HST campaign in 2010.

Led by Dana Larsen, a founding director of the Vancouver Medicinal Cannabis Dispensary and former B.C. NDP leadership candidate, and Kirk Tousaw, the executive director of the Beyond Prohibition Foundation and a director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, the campaign has drafted proposed legislation it’s calling the Sensible Policing Act.

According to Sensible B.C., the proposed bill would see weed possession decriminalized for adults and the province formally call on the federal government to allow B.C. to begin legally taxing and regulating cannabis much like alcohol and tobacco.

“The Sensible Policing Act instructs all police in the province to stop spending time and resources searching or arresting people for simple possession of cannabis, while still prohibiting possession by minors in the same manner as alcohol,” Tousaw said in a news release sent out today (September 17). “The new law also calls upon the federal government to let BC go our own way on cannabis policy, and sets up a provincial commission to figure out exactly what legally regulated cannabis will look like in BC, since it will fall mostly under provincial control, like alcohol and tobacco.”

Sensible B.C. expects to launch its initiative-petition effort in the fall of 2013. The campaign will need to gather around 400,000 signatures from voters around the province in 90 days in order to force the B.C. government to look at holding a referendum in 2014.

“Setting police priorities is within provincial jurisdiction, and our proposed legislation has been accepted by Elections BC as constitutionally sound and suitable for a ballot initiative,” Tousaw said. “While we hope that the provincial government will see fit to pass the Sensible Policing Act into law, we’re focusing on building support for a referendum.”

Sensible B.C.’s advisory board includes Cannabis Culture Headquarters director Jodie Emery, BCCLA executive director David Eby, and Victoria police officer David Bratzer as members.

Bratzer is a member of the steering committee for the Stop the Violence B.C. coalition, which is also seeking marijuana legalization.

Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson, former NDP premiers Mike Harcourt and Ujjal Dosanjh, and former B.C. attorney general Geoff Plant are among the past and present politicians who have endorsed Stop the Violence’s call for the taxation and regulation of weed.

You can follow Stephen Hui on Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest.

Comments (20) Add New Comment
Confirmed
Decriminalization leaves the money on crimes hands, le-ga-lize, then guess who get the money and who doesn't.
0
1
Rating: -1
Sign me up
This sounds very promising. I will definitely get involved.
1
1
Rating: 0
Birdy
Maybe while we're at it, we could actually, fully, and completely legalize HEMP.

Look at how insane our regulations for industrial hemp are:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/substancontrol/hemp-chanvre/about-apropos/f...

Hemp concrete is 10 times stronger than regular concrete, around one tenth the weight, and it gets stronger as it ages, by absorbing CO2 from the air.

There are a billion uses for hemp but despite popular opinion it is still a "controlled substance" which means endless purposely discouraging hoops to jump through for anyone to grow it, which of course drives up the price for people who want to manufacture products with it.
5
3
Rating: +2
Off with their heads
If they want to make a buck with weed, they'll have to make sure it's just has good and cheaper than the street price. If it's not, these drug addicts will never change supplier.
0
1
Rating: -1
PleaseWhatever
BC must tax and regulate if it hopes to stay competitive in the cannabis market. Many states in the US are moving quickly in this direction with initiatives on the ballots in the coming elections. It's happening people, get used to it.
0
1
Rating: -1
David H
Legalize nature, duh! Hemp is a good plant in too many ways to count
1
1
Rating: 0
Nunya Biznis
The US Fed will never let this happen. Organized crime sure doesn't want this too happen. Too many people still believe all the government and media propaganda about the evils of cannabis. So who, besides a handful of potheads, will actually support legalization?

I know it makes sense but I also know that what makes sense for the people rarely coincides with what the gov't is willing to do.
1
0
Rating: +1
shavluk
Decrim doesnt exist..imagine alcohol only decrimed
Legal to posses but illegal to produce or sell
1
0
Rating: +1
Sensible ideas
The idea is to decrim as a first step to a legally taxed and regulated market. No-one is saying decrim is the final solution, but it is a good first step.

Washington, Oregon and Colorado are all voting to legalize cannabis at the state level in November. Fear of US reprisals are overblown.

65-70% of people in BC support legalization or decrim. If we can get this to a vote we will certainly win.
0
1
Rating: -1
James G
I agree with comments above by Confirmed and Birdy.

As a user of medical marijuana on holiday here in San Francisco, I was surprised to learn from friends how much further they have gone here than at home. There are more locations unfettered by legal restrictions and more products available, no offense meant to our own excellent dispensaries. What is, in spite of the raging war on drugs, is a de facto decriminalization on both sides of the border right now. Why set sights so low when legalization itself is so clear on the horizon?

I can foresee difficulty in passing such legislation through our federal Parliament. This isn't due to the federal NDP leader's lukewarm attitude towards such a step nor any interference from the United States. What worries me is that following the next federal election is that even if a majority of M.P.s in a minority Parliament led by the NDP or Conservatives that Harper's carefully crafted majority in the Senate will block any moves toward legalization. In fact, they may well block environmental protections and interfere with any progressive legislation. Instead of wasting everyone's time on a referendum on provincial decriminalization, activists would be better advised to demand the abolition of the Senate. The public will should be manifested on marijuana, regardless of our chamber or "sober" second thought, foreign intrigue or those profiting by the existing underground economy.
0
1
Rating: -1
Moebius Stripper
While I really hope that the HST referendum doesn't start a trend whereby every other issue is voted on directly, marijuana decriminalization is one on which our elected representatives have shown such an appalling lack of leadership that I don't see any other choice. Bring it on.
1
2
Rating: -1
Alan Boisvert
I support this initiative totally.It is a long time coming.
1
1
Rating: 0
Pat Crowe
Hey Hoppies!
You all do realize you can now grow six plants without fear of prosecution thanks to Harper.
1
0
Rating: +1
Sensible ideas
Pat, that is 100% wrong. Harper didn't legalize growing 6 plants. He put in mandatory minimums for growing over 6 plants, but the laws against growing 1-5 plants stayed in place.
0
0
Rating: 0
Puff the Magic Dragon
History proves prohibiton helps no one but organized crime but when have we ever learned from history If people want something they will find a way to obtain those things. This makes sense in many ways. The taxes as with alcohol alone would improve the general economy.All the money wasted on policing pot would go the same way as it did with ending prohihition on alcohol. out of the control of organized crime . "Sensible Ideas" is right on the mark
1
0
Rating: +1
Rod Grieve
Sensible ideas makes sense to me.History holds the evidence that prohibition serves no one but organized crime. Our governrng bodies would find all those tax dollars useful I am certain.
1
1
Rating: 0
USA012
In the street,in the black market it cost lower ,with no taxes..
So,the goverment is not going to make money with this,even
when everybody move to Colorado and Washington,nobody
is going to pay more taxes for something is almost free in
the street...
What about think in public health instead?..the secondary smokers
who doesn't want to smoke what is in the air?..children finding in the
floor this cigarettes,pipes,powders and others drugs syringes,spoons..
does it worth it??..is a high price to pay
1
1
Rating: 0
USA012
What about think in public health instead?.
children finding in the
floor this cigarettes,pipes,the "magic powders"
and others drugs "parafernalia" syringes,spoons..
does it worth it ??..does it worth to make a live a "POT"?..
NOW..THAT is a high price to pay.thought
1
2
Rating: -1
Steve Hazen
First off USA012, wow try to use proper grammar next time, your posts are very hard to follow! Now then, let's look at the cost comparison of black market to corner stores. The average marijuana plant costs $20 to fully grow and bud out, and will produce 4-6 ounces of marijuana bud. That's $5 per ounce. Let's say a legal grower wants to triple their money so they sell it for $15 per ounce to a distribution chain. Distribution wants to make money, so they sell it for $30 per ounce to retail stores or corner stores. Retail marks it up cause they want money too, so it's now $60 per ounce, add say 20% tax to that and the final cost to legally buy marijuana from a corner store is $72 per ounce. Black market pricing is anywhere from $100-$320 per ounce!
1
1
Rating: 0
rob m
I'm not a user but I have no problem with the legalizing it.
illegalizing it was mainly a political not health matter and it does less harm then other things the goverment sanctions.
my worries are users - driving or working heavy equipment.
I also worry about all the people making big dollars out of this replacing it by pushing other drugs- I assume there will be a big surge in crystal something
1
1
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.