SFU under fire for accepting $10 million from Goldcorp
A Vancouver community worker and artist says she wants Simon Fraser University to return a $10-million donation from a Vancouver-based mining company.
Sara Kendall told the Straight by phone that she's "starting to see e-mails fly back and forth" about the gift from Goldcorp, which has been criticized for its mining activities in Latin America.
On September 23, SFU announced that Goldcorp contributed $5 million to SFU's capital campaign and another $5 million in the Goldcorp Centre for the Arts Community Endowment, which will finance community-engagement programs in the Downtown Eastside.
SFU has named its new arts facility in the Woodward's complex the "Goldcorp Centre for the Arts".
"It's a totally incompatible move on their part," Kendall said of SFU's decision. "I would like to see it rejected. I would like to see them retract their acceptance of the $10 mil."
She added that she hopes to arrange a conversation over Skype between journalists and community members in areas mined by Goldcorp. and senior SFU officials, including the president, Andrew Petter.
"We'll do community action if that's necessary—if they're super-unreceptive," Kendall said. "But before I organize a rally, I would rather have that conversation."
In 2008, some shareholders demanded that Goldcorp finance an independent human-rights assessment of its activities at the Marlin Mine in Guatemala.
In May, On Common Ground Consultants released its report, which came after 189 individual interviews, nine group interviews, and 10 focus groups, as well as a review of hundreds of company documents.
It found that Goldcorp and its wholly owned Guatemalan subsidiary "need to address human rights explicitly, comprehensively, and as a matter of ongoing due diligence".
The Guatemalan subsidiary failed to acknowledge the Sipakepense residents as a distinct indigenous people, according to the report. Moreover, there was no comprehensive human rights policy at the mine, and the subsidiary fired staff who tried to form a union.
In its written response, Goldcorp committed to integrating respect for human rights into its business-management processes throughout the company.
Kendall also pointed out that in the past, Goldcorp filed a NAFTA challenge under Chapter 11, which deals with investors' rights, against the California and U.S. governments' regulations concerning hard-rock mining.
The company hoped to develop a mine on land that was considered sacred by the Quechan indigenous people. In 2009, a NAFTA tribunal dismissed Goldcorp's arguments.





How ironic that a company shown to violate the human rights of the indigenous peoples of Guatemala would "philanthropically" donate money to a building located in a neighborhood with a large First Nations population.
Shame on SFU!! They are not thinking of the world, they are thinking about their bottom line!
I demand that SFU reject this shameful attempt at philanthropic work. Because it isn't. It's disgusting.
Sara I fully back you on this and so will many SFU students.
The irony is so clear that is borders on hypocrisy.
There is no such thing as ultruism.
You couldn't PAY ME to go there ~ what an ENTIRE FREAK SHOW?!
Also; I hear that Accenture; aka. ENRON has it's finger prints all over our new CONVOLUTE DELAY AND DENY 'Healthscare System' ~ NICE..
LET'S SANITIZE OUR HOUSE NOW, Hurry, the longer it takes, the longer it takes to get them OUT!
http://www.bcndp.ca/moveupyourvote
Anyone who has ever accepted a Rockefeller Foundation grant or fellowship needs to know how that fortune was founded, about the Standard Oil Trust, and how that Trust was actually built -- then give the money back.
Anyone who has received Ford Foundation money for inner city work needs to know Henry Ford's opinion of the Jews -- then give the money back.
Anyone who has ever received Guggenheim money needs to know that their fortune began in Colorado with lead and silver mines, vicious scabs brought in as strikebreakers, and the destruction of countless streams and rivers -- and then give the money back.
And, anyone who has benefitted from the Gates Foundation and its vast donations in Africa to fight AIDS and malaria, and its work to build schools in 3rd world nations and neighbourhoods, needs only look at how Bill Gates built his fortune on predatory business practices -- and give the money back, at least on behalf of those who would otherwise be dead of AIDS and malaria.
A little consistency, please.
SFU is an exceptional learning institution - its my school - its my eldest daughters (and I hope my youngest - but that will be her choice) and I would tell anyone thinking of going to a post secondary institution that SFU is the cat's meow.
I would be happy to work with SFU Alumni to make it a formidable and ethical fund raising body to ensure continuity with proper principles.
With GS permission (only) reach me at glen_robbins@email.com
Do you really think that by not accepting this donation you will have done something about the 'human rights' condition of those in Guatemala? No! and not even close. So in conclusion, just stfu and take their money and use the facilities, books, services or whatever that money gives you to the max.
My honest opinion!
I will repeat-- from a point of social science ethics there is no such thing as ultruism. This is the baseline from which ethical standards ought to be considered.
You won't often see a credible Public Broadcaster (news) taking these monies, more often it is from a particular foundation (wealthy people who created the foundation for good ethical efforts usually).
I don't agree with taking the dollars based on the 'evidence' provided within this narrow context, nor have I researched it further.
Pages