SFU under fire for accepting $10 million from Goldcorp

Comments

A Vancouver community worker and artist says she wants Simon Fraser University to return a $10-million donation from a Vancouver-based mining company.

Sara Kendall told the Straight by phone that she's "starting to see e-mails fly back and forth" about the gift from Goldcorp, which has been criticized for its mining activities in Latin America.

On September 23, SFU announced that Goldcorp contributed $5 million to SFU's capital campaign and another $5 million in the Goldcorp Centre for the Arts Community Endowment, which will finance community-engagement programs in the Downtown Eastside.

SFU has named its new arts facility in the Woodward's complex the "Goldcorp Centre for the Arts".

"It's a totally incompatible move on their part," Kendall said of SFU's decision. "I would like to see it rejected. I would like to see them retract their acceptance of the $10 mil."

She added that she hopes to arrange a conversation over Skype between journalists and community members in areas mined by Goldcorp. and senior SFU officials, including the president, Andrew Petter.

"We'll do community action if that's necessary—if they're super-unreceptive," Kendall said. "But before I organize a rally, I would rather have that conversation."

In 2008, some shareholders demanded that Goldcorp finance an independent human-rights assessment of its activities at the Marlin Mine in Guatemala.

In May, On Common Ground Consultants released its report, which came after 189 individual interviews, nine group interviews, and 10 focus groups, as well as a review of hundreds of company documents.

It found that Goldcorp and its wholly owned Guatemalan subsidiary "need to address human rights explicitly, comprehensively, and as a matter of ongoing due diligence".

The Guatemalan subsidiary failed to acknowledge the Sipakepense residents as a distinct indigenous people, according to the report. Moreover, there was no comprehensive human rights policy at the mine, and the subsidiary fired staff who tried to form a union.

In its written response, Goldcorp committed to integrating respect for human rights into its business-management processes throughout the company.

Kendall also pointed out that in the past, Goldcorp filed a NAFTA challenge under Chapter 11, which deals with investors' rights, against the California and U.S. governments' regulations concerning hard-rock mining.

The company hoped to develop a mine on land that was considered sacred by the Quechan indigenous people. In 2009, a NAFTA tribunal dismissed Goldcorp's arguments.

Comments (40) Add New Comment
A
Give me a break: send the money back and let the taxpayers suport the intiative.We really need a reality check. MAYBE THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO ACCEPT THE MONEY OR LET THE INTITATIVE DIE! right that will never happen.
0
0
Rating: 0
it's me
As an SFU student I am completely outraged and disgusted that SFU would accepted this shameful green-washed donation from Goldcorp.

How ironic that a company shown to violate the human rights of the indigenous peoples of Guatemala would "philanthropically" donate money to a building located in a neighborhood with a large First Nations population.

Shame on SFU!! They are not thinking of the world, they are thinking about their bottom line!

I demand that SFU reject this shameful attempt at philanthropic work. Because it isn't. It's disgusting.
0
0
Rating: 0
Starsky
Do it!
Sara I fully back you on this and so will many SFU students.
The irony is so clear that is borders on hypocrisy.
0
0
Rating: 0
SFU Graduate
I was OUTRAGED when I read about my alma mater accepting "dirty" money from Goldcorp and I support Ms. Kendall's attempt to talk some sense into Mr. Petter. I will never donate money to SFU in the future if they're going to associate with a company that goes against everything I was taught at that school (so hypocritical of them!). To make sure this never happens again, as alumni, I demand SFU conduct a formal inquiry to find out how a company with such a devastating human rights and environmental record was even given an meeting with my school, let alone being given the naming rights to one of our buildings. I'd rather we keep using those old portables than take money from that company. Very, very, very disappointed in SFU!
0
0
Rating: 0
glen p robbins
I agree that we need to reform political donations in BC. Also only individuals should be permitted to donate to Universities, colleges, and other institutions of learning that receive tax payer money.

There is no such thing as ultruism.
0
0
Rating: 0
Good.
SFU needs to be exposed as for the money grabbing crooks they are.
0
0
Rating: 0
RunningFrog
I appears that SFU does not have a legal agenda; they are merely training HATE SPEACH for social media bloggers, terrorizing Our Fair Canada; and fully DEGENERATING Our Quality of Life. NIMBY.

You couldn't PAY ME to go there ~ what an ENTIRE FREAK SHOW?!

Also; I hear that Accenture; aka. ENRON has it's finger prints all over our new CONVOLUTE DELAY AND DENY 'Healthscare System' ~ NICE..

LET'S SANITIZE OUR HOUSE NOW, Hurry, the longer it takes, the longer it takes to get them OUT!

http://www.bcndp.ca/moveupyourvote
0
0
Rating: 0
beelzebub
We will see how many will boycott the center on principal, and how many poverty pimps on the DTES will refuse it. ahahaha.
0
0
Rating: 0
guy
I say take their money. Use it for real philanthropy. What's wrong with that? No one's taking Goldcorp seriously anyway. F** 'em take their money.
0
0
Rating: 0
A
Right lets refuse these type donations on politcal grounds whether Green , right or left wing. Students should pay for their entire education through tution fees not through burdens on the taxpayer. For all you posters this will allow you to get your degree without guilt or compromising your principles. You did it your self. YEAH RIGHT....THE ENTITLED ONES WILL JUMP ON THIS
0
0
Rating: 0
East Van Arts
These criticisms are fine as far as they go, but it's just not far enough. Gold Star is a very minor player here.

Anyone who has ever accepted a Rockefeller Foundation grant or fellowship needs to know how that fortune was founded, about the Standard Oil Trust, and how that Trust was actually built -- then give the money back.

Anyone who has received Ford Foundation money for inner city work needs to know Henry Ford's opinion of the Jews -- then give the money back.

Anyone who has ever received Guggenheim money needs to know that their fortune began in Colorado with lead and silver mines, vicious scabs brought in as strikebreakers, and the destruction of countless streams and rivers -- and then give the money back.

And, anyone who has benefitted from the Gates Foundation and its vast donations in Africa to fight AIDS and malaria, and its work to build schools in 3rd world nations and neighbourhoods, needs only look at how Bill Gates built his fortune on predatory business practices -- and give the money back, at least on behalf of those who would otherwise be dead of AIDS and malaria.

A little consistency, please.
0
0
Rating: 0
Advocate
Running Frog: But aren't most of today's universities just "freak shows" when it comes to academic freedom? With speech codes, selective discipline against "politically incorrect" expression and dependence on large corporate donations that hamper objective research, today's universities are a faint copy of what they were in the 1960's.
1
0
Rating: +1
apeasant
Come on people, start at 2:20. This is old.

0
0
Rating: 0
burt
It doesn't look good for an institute of higher education as respected as SFU to accept donations from them. But sad reality is money trumps morals and ethics these days. Just look at Canada and other countries trying to get in on China's economy despite their human rights and foreign policies. They're pushing each other into the store like a Boxing Day sale. Good to see students trying to preserve the ideals society has remaining though.
0
0
Rating: 0
glen p robbins
The solution is to have SFU Alumni become better promoted and a stronger presence at the University. The Alumni needs to have a set of principles and standards with respect to donations to the University and avoid accepting donations where there is clear potential for ethical conflicts. The Alumni constructs this from consultation with student society and other stakeholders - and makes objectives with respect to donations clear and public.

SFU is an exceptional learning institution - its my school - its my eldest daughters (and I hope my youngest - but that will be her choice) and I would tell anyone thinking of going to a post secondary institution that SFU is the cat's meow.

I would be happy to work with SFU Alumni to make it a formidable and ethical fund raising body to ensure continuity with proper principles.
With GS permission (only) reach me at glen_robbins@email.com
0
0
Rating: 0
Colleen Fuller
It's right to condemn SFU for accepting this tainted money, but it also should be criticized for failing to rally the public in favour of increased public funding for post-secondary education. They seem to think it's A-okay to grovel for corporate crumbs, but not to demand higher corporate taxes so we can provide increased federal and provincial funding.
0
0
Rating: 0
Luis Manuel Claps
In Argentina, many universities, academics and students groups have rejected dirty money from Minera Alumbrera, the biggest open pit mine in the country operated by Xstrata in which Goldcorp holds a 37% interest. See: http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=9376
0
0
Rating: 0
rantEr
Shut the f*** up! The only smart comment on here was by Guy, just take their money and use it, how do you know that all the other funds used to build the downtown campus was not dirty money or what about the over-paid professors who sell their grades to rich students? who cares...

Do you really think that by not accepting this donation you will have done something about the 'human rights' condition of those in Guatemala? No! and not even close. So in conclusion, just stfu and take their money and use the facilities, books, services or whatever that money gives you to the max.

My honest opinion!
0
0
Rating: 0
glen p robbins
rantEr - I can see how many would find your comments to be realistic - however it does not seriously consider the problems that can arise with a take the money and run approach.

I will repeat-- from a point of social science ethics there is no such thing as ultruism. This is the baseline from which ethical standards ought to be considered.

You won't often see a credible Public Broadcaster (news) taking these monies, more often it is from a particular foundation (wealthy people who created the foundation for good ethical efforts usually).

I don't agree with taking the dollars based on the 'evidence' provided within this narrow context, nor have I researched it further.
0
0
Rating: 0
Hmm...
Also, I think it's rather interesting that because of the donation, more people are now aware of the damage this company has caused to the people and land in Latin America. Clearly this is not the kind of response they were looking for. Ha!
0
0
Rating: 0

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.