SlutWalk Vancouver raises the bar in movement against victim-blaming
What did I wear to SlutWalk? Well, like many Vancouverites do most mornings of the year, I rolled out of bed, saw that it was wet and grey outside, and pulled on my rain boots and raincoat.
My mother was wearing jeans and a black track coat. On our way out the door, my dad tried to foist these hideous neon pink hats on us, saying that we didn’t look flamboyant enough for SlutWalk.
When we arrived at the Vancouver Art Gallery just before 1 p.m., we were relieved to see that we were not the only ones who decided to dress warmly (and blandly) for the weather. Except for the brave few who dared to bare skin to demonstrate that no manner of dress is an invitation for rape, the majority of us were bundled up.
However, an earlier estimate of 1,500 participants swelled to more than 2,000 as the march took off—showing that a little rain did not keep Vancouver participants from taking a stand against sexual violence and victim-blaming.
"Since 2008, rates of sexual assault in Vancouver have skyrocketed," said SlutWalk organizer Katie Raso as she rallied the crowd. "We are here to say that no matter where we go, and no matter what we wear, yes means yes and no always means no."
The participants seemed to have gotten the message. They carried signs such as "Let’s Change a Don’t Get Raped Culture Into a Don’t Rape Culture" and chanted slogans like: "My little black dress does not mean yes!"
As we marched toward the Vancouver Convention Centre to the beats of a Balkan brass band and a Native drum group, I spotted a young man striding along in a short skirt and four-inch leopard-print stilettos.
"It's my first time in heels," said Billy Taylor, "but I brought my sneakers in case I can’t make it the whole way."
Taylor's slightly more conservatively dressed friend, Casper LeBlanc, added: "We're here today because we want to support the end of rape culture and spread the message that there is no excuse for sexual assault."
As I moved through the crowd to interview other walk participants, I felt a surge of pride for my hometown. I was inspired by the diversity of people around me. There were parents pushing strollers, groups of guys strutting around in Canucks jerseys, a roller derby crew, people in suits with name tags coming straight out of a conference, kids running around, and maybe most inspiring of all, almost half of the walk participants were men.
Men of all ages carried signs saying things like "Bought Her Dinner? She Doesn’t Owe You Anything" and "Real Men Take No for An Answer".
The energy peaked when we marched through the Granville Street club district: a place where SlutWalk organizer Katie Nordgren says it’s hard to find a woman "who has ever been to a club along the Granville Strip who hasn't been harassed or assaulted to some degree."
While SlutWalk Vancouver seeks to raise awareness about high rates of sexual assault and victim-blaming in the Greater Vancouver area, it's also part of a worldwide movement. More than 60 other walks have been held already or will take place during the next few months in cities such as London, New York, Johannesburg, and Dublin.
In the huge outburst of impassioned debates that have accompanied the proliferation of SlutWalks around the world, one of the recurring criticisms that has emerged is that "slut" is too sexist and triggering a word for feminists to reclaim.
The Vancouver organizing team had carefully deliberated over whether or not to use the name SlutWalk. Nordgren explained their decision to me: “We realized that the problematic nature of the name of SlutWalk itself has been able to start so many important discussions about what the word ”˜slut’ means and about how ”˜slut’ is used to devalue and shut down women as unworthy of consideration, protection, and justice.”
“We're hearing from a lot of people that the name put them off at first, but that they've come around to the idea that there's no better word that sums up the culture we're trying very hard to deconstruct,” Nordgren added.
Since sex workers often suffer the most extreme consequences of slut shaming, I thought it was incredible that a sex worker, Lilliana D’Amour, had the courage to give a speech during the last stop of the route, where she called herself a slut (which she defines as anyone who has ever pissed anyone off).
"When a serial killer [Robert Pickton] can get away with killing more than 60 women and people turn a blind eye because those women were sex workers, that’s whorephobia," said D’Amour, as the crowd hushed in somber reflection.
Joyce Arthur, a representative of FIRST (a coalition of feminists who advocate for the decriminalization of adult sex work), commended SlutWalk Vancouver for supporting the rights of sex workers and other marginalized groups. But she said, "We have to remember that there are people who are not at the march today because they oppose SlutWalk."
Last week, Globe and Mail columnist Margaret Wente wrote a scathing critique of SlutWalk, in which she claimed that participants were engaging in "narcissistic self-indulgence". She dismissed SlutWalks as "what you get when graduate students in feminist studies run out of things to do."
I wonder what Wente would think if she had attended SlutWalk Vancouver and witnessed participation from people of all ages, ethnicities, and walks of life—and the range and depth in which the speakers and organizers addressed topics such as the intersectionality of different kinds of oppression and the various meanings of the word slut.
When I asked Medina, a 14-year-old Port Moody secondary student, about what she wanted people who had not attended SlutWalk to know about the event, she said: "People are being raped and being blamed for it. SlutWalk is trying to correct that. I think that people should learn more about SlutWalk in order to understand it better."
For more information on SlutWalk Vancouver, visit go here. Review the Twitter updates or join in on the dialogue using the hashtag #slutwalkvan.
Follow Joanna Chiu on Twitter at twitter.com/joannachiu.







Being a middle twenties man, I have seen growing up how women are dressing and when you have 14/15 year old girls dressing where their butt cheeks pretty much hanging out of your pants. I also knew a 15 year old girl who's dream was to become a "porn star". There is something wrong with society and the way people are raising their children.
Also the amount of under age drinking or people who can't handle their booze is amazing. Last Thursday night I was standing in line at a ice cream shop waiting in line,with a woman in her early 20's behind me going on how last weekend she drank so much that 15 mins after getting into the bar she completely blacked out and doesn't remember anything that happened. Going on with her story she then tells her companion that she was so "out of it" that she almost went home with some random guy and it was one of her friend that saw her getting into a cab with someone and they went out to grab her. Here I will let you take a guess at what the next part of the conversation was..... It was her asking her friend to come out with her the next night for a party at a bar. So we can tell that this woman didn't learn her lesson and is back at it again. Hopefully nothing happened to this woman.
Another thing which I have seen in my days is the amount of women where all they do is use men to get things from them. Lead them on, do like things like kissing and then ditch them once they get what they want. It is unfair to men to have women lead them on and use and abuse them. I am not saying that men don't mistreat women cause there are some that do.
In general I think the women that are going for these slutwalks need to look at the big picture. I am guessing 50% of rape is a 2 way street and can be avoided. I understand that some creep sitting in a alley way waiting for someone is not avoidable (unless they are able to break free and get away) but women using men for money/gifts and leading them need to look at the big picture of having to actually work for what they want.
My last 2 comments will be this. I have 2 theroies in life when it comes to this subject and had a late 20's woman who is a paramedic agreed with me:
1) If you cannot dress is normal cloths and need to dress in pretty much nothing to be "sexy" you are not sexy.
2) Act like a slut and you will get treated like a slut.
I am sure this has pissed off alot of people but we as a society need to look at the way some women are presenting them selfs and do something about it.
perhaps you should "grab a brain" before spouting off your uninformed opinion.
The point that it's not realistic to expect to be treated well in a rape case if you have dressed in a short skirt etc, THAT is what this is all about. Making it so that it is not an issue.
We are not cavemen and women and should not act like them. Control yourselves beasts!
You say that rape is not okay, but then you listed a bunch of paragraphs suggesting that those behaviors mean she is asking for it.
When in reality, any one who attempts to sexually assault her or rape her is culpable for their actions. Not her.
It is rape/sexual assault that are wrong.
Rape is wrong, no doubt about it, but a woman still needs to be aware of the effect she has on men when she chooses to wear skimpy outfits. She needs to UNDERSTAND that she is leaving a certain impression when she chooses to wear a garment that exposes her body in a bigger way than it is appropriate. If you expect men to control themselves, you, as a woman have to control yourself too and dress appropriately, and not like a savage.
The perception that loose morals are associated with dressing skimpy is never going to be changed; it is part of society beliefs and it is true in 90% of cases. So if you want to be taken seriously, dress the part.
The society needs to look at the big picture, and the big picture is that women have lost their modesty, elegance and good taste.
And the word "slut" has poor taste; women need to steer away from these names, not support their use.
Joanna
Your lack of education and awareness is both startling and saddening. I'm grateful for all the beautiful men I have in my life, more so now that you have shown us the division between those who prefer arrogant sexism and those who respect women as equals, as human beings. The men who are rational and informed strive to end objectification of women as commodities, subjugation of women as 'things' that are there for the taking.
You are a disgrace to Canadian men.
And thanks to all the commenters missing the point for showing why these events need to happen. :)
Of course women are aware of the effect of skimpy clothes. What judges, police, and anyone who wants to victimize someone need to know is that a victim's clothes are not a mitigating factor in the assault.
Myself and several of my friends have been victims of sexual attacks, and in every case we were dressed modestly. Predators don't care what you're wearing, but they're always looking for excuses. It's time we stopped giving predators excuses for their behaviour and started protecting people from them.
No one here says that rape is OK, and justified, you decided to add this to Raymond's comments yourself - he didn't actually say that; he actually said the opposite. No one here is objectifying women either - in fact they manage to do that themselves quite well when they choose to dress provocatively.
You don't want to be objectified by men? Then stop dressing and acting the part.
The big problem with our society is that little girls are seeing over-sexualization of women early on in their lives. Instead of allowing girls to see Britney Spears half-naked on screen, perhaps educate them math and sciences, or home-making, or whatever they show inclination towards. That way they will have substance and value. Kids of both genders are exposed to violence and sex on TV early on and it shows later on in life. That IS THE PROBLEM.
Your little SlutWalk is not going to solve that. To cure a disease you need to fight its source, not cover up symptoms.
Also, are people forgetting that spontaneous rape at the hands of a complete stranger is the exception rather than the norm? Rapists are predators and generally pick their targets in advance, what a person may be wearing at the time of the attack is most likely irrelevant.
Now women who dress provocatively definitely do not deserve to get raped, but to hide from the fact that dressing in such a matter draws increased attention is pretty naive. As a normal non-violent man, if it definitely draws my attention, so it's definitely also going to draw unwanted attention as well.
The logic in all of this is backwards (thank you feminists!). Basically, something that is obvious can't possible be true because it implies that the victim was in some way at fault. Since a woman cannot be responsible for any bad thing that happens to her, the idea that dressing provocatively increases the risk of danger is absurd. Yet, that fact that dressing this way increases the attention that a woman could get from creepy and / or violent men remains true.
Pages