VACC pumps purchase power of cyclists with Businesses for Bikes program

Comments

If you ask Erin O’Melinn, cyclists don’t only have pedal power; they also have purchase power. And they know how to use it.

“Cyclists spend more than people think and their average income is way higher than people think,” O’Melinn, the program manager responsible for the Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition’s Businesses for Bikes initiative, which launched today (September 28), told the Straight by phone.

According to O’Melinn, Businesses for Bikes is a membership-driven program which already has 62 founding members on day one.

One member, Ron van der Eerden of downtown-based Pacific Image Home Designs, is an outspoken cyclist who has long touted the benefits of increased cycling in the region, and particularly in the city centre.

“As cycling downtown becomes safer and more people take advantage of that choice, the liveability of the public realm improves,” Van der Eerden states in today’s VACC press release on Businesses for Bikes. “This draws more people to the core and invites them to stay longer. It’s good for business.”

O’Melinn said VACC surveyed more than 1,400 cyclists in Metro Vancouver who participated in Bike to Work Week and found around 50 percent of them earn $50,000 or more per year. Of those surveyed, about a quarter make $75,000 or over.

She said the program is not about being antagonistic toward the Downtown Vancouver Business Improvement Association, whose executive director, Charles Gauthier, was one of the main opponents of the Burrard Bridge lane-reallocation trial.

“I know that both the DVBIA and the Board of Trade have had their opinions voiced quite loudly, and we wanted to provide a balanced view and show that there are a number of businesses that are very supportive of cycling improvements and cycling in general,” O’Melinn added.

Later O’Melinn said, “The DVBIA are not the enemy by any means.”

In the coming months, Businesses for Bikes will distribute a Guide for Marketing to Cyclists and kick off a Discover by Bike project, according to the VACC release.

For the past two months, the city has been accepting public input on a proposed separated bike lane on Hornby Street.

Comments (19) Add New Comment
trixie
I love my green city, and I love being able to cycle safely to and from stuff that I do in the downtown core. What a great way to travel.

Thanks to the City for sticking to its promises on cycling infrastructure.
1
2
Rating: -1
Nick
Great work VACC on getting the business community on side with cyclists! It's easier to get around or shop downtown on a bike or foot than being stuck behind the wheel of a car trying to find a silly and expensive parking space.
1
0
Rating: +1
RealityCheck
Did you know that over $300,000 of VACC's funding comes from taxpayer dollars? That's right...this propaganda campaign is being paid for by you!
1
3
Rating: -2
erin_
To be clear, municipal and regional government funding to the VACC is entirely for bicycle programming, events, and education courses. Advocacy is done by volunteers and private donations.
2
1
Rating: +1
RealityCheck
The fact is you're collecting taxpayer dollars to lobby governments for millions. The "programs" are a front for your political work.
2
1
Rating: +1
Birdy
re: erin

Bicycle programming?
What are these bicycles programmed to do?
Should I fear self-aware robot bicycles?
Do robobikes feel love?
1
0
Rating: +1
@RealityCheck
Ragging on cyclists is as low as it gets. If you want to complain about propaganda, look at TransLink, instead.

After all the crap "Be Part of the Plan" scam which really was a ruse for us to give TransLink $150 million/yr to pay for the RAV Line so that the TransLink elite could keep their jobs and avoid jail time for lying to build the RAV Line with false rider ship figures, we are entering a new propaganda campaign for TransLink elite and their drug dealer condo developer friends to make a killing on the EGL. Meanwhile the people on the B-Line route as well as users are getting stung long with the UBC $10 million dollar transit study wasting our time and money for the next 10 years.

Stay tuned and read the Vancouver Sun. Plenty of BS on the why we need the EGL to follow soon.
3
1
Rating: +2
BikerCK
I bet I've spent hundreds of dollars at Terra Bread since they opened up their bakery on 5th Ave. Why? Because I go past it on the bike route four of five times a week. Well, that and the fact their cornbread muffins have a secret ingredient that makes you crave them fortnightly.
1
1
Rating: 0
BillJ
If businesses along Hornby would look at the census data, they would realize that cyclists are the demographic they should marketing to. Drivers spend about one day a week paying for the motor vehicles (based on CAA data). Cyclists who don't own cars and earn similar incomes have about 20% of their income available for other things. If I owned a restaurant, hotel, beauty salon etc, I would want cyclists as my customers.
1
2
Rating: -1
Ray I
Problem with cyclist commuters is that they have no way of getting very much home on their bikes. Do you see cyclists with their panniers overflowing with bags from Holts or Rosen? NO! How about those bike locked up in front of our fine dining establishments, hotels, theatres, Canucks games? NO, NO, NO, NO, and NO! Forget the stats and look at observable reality. Cyclists who commute by bike are not significant consumers in the downtown area. And I say that as a big (recreational) cyclist who rides downtown from East van at least twice a week (and will be doing so today. I don't need cycling lanes. I simply know what streets to ride on and plan my routes. If you are too timid to ride on city streets then stay on the side streets. Its just takes common sense not millions of tax dollars!
1
2
Rating: -1
RealityCheck
@Ray

Exactly...well said. The Mayor and Vision ignored advice from their own engineers on side routes and bike lane alternatives that wouldn't cause congestion downtown.

Now the bike lanes are horrifically over budget because the city didn't take into consideration even common sense things like loading zones and right turns.

No one opposes bikes downtown. As long as they follow the rules of the road and don't cause accidents and congestion.
1
0
Rating: +1
SportUtilityCyclist
Hmm, can't buy things and transport them on a bike? You had better tell that to the people in India and China. I can carry lots on my bicycle. I recently bought and carried a $700 suit. Fine dining? Been there, done that. Many people do this. Hotels, yes been there done that. Theatre too.

Cycled to meetings with MLA's and somehow managed to show up in a suit. I have cycled to a few Canucks games, but don't do it more often, as the bicycle parking is extremely limited and atrocious. Arenas and stadiums such as SF's AT&T Park have well used valet bicycle parking. Nat Bailey often does that and many more cyclists cycle there as a result. If you build it, they will come and they will shop there.
2
1
Rating: +1
paul bogaert
yeah sure just because you don't need bike lanes means no one else feels freaked out by riding with rush hour traffic. oh and which side streets quietly lead into down town? but don't spill the beans here Ray and RealtyChick 'cause then the taxi drivers and delivery vehicles will flock to them.
1
1
Rating: 0
Neale Adams
What I don't understand from the anti-bike-lane folks in this discussion is, if you think people riding bicycles is a "good thing" - less pollution, better health, etc. - then why oppose efforts to encourage cycling. Ray I: You don't need cycle lanes, well, neither do I. But the research shows that many people do. In the scheme of things, they don't cost all that much - the entire Hornby project will cost about as much as one left turn bay on Knight. Why the passionate opposition?
2
1
Rating: +1
@ray and fantasycheck
Funny, I cycle everyday 5,000 km yearly and spent $70 for clothes on the way home this evening and another $80 for a wireless Walkman last week. My easy 10 km commute is 30 minutes along Hornby and Dunsmuir from Point Grey. Every day I eat out for lunch spending $50 weekly downtown and spend another $50 on this and that. Everything I buy fits easily in my panniers (front and back).

The tight wads who take transit or drive, eat at their desks to save money, presumably because they don’t have any money left over after paying for parking or welfare transit. They also don’t get much exercise either, lament about being fat and tell you how they plan to join a gym some day when they have more time. They live in Coquitlam, Richmond, Burnaby or Surrey and never have the time after commuting two to three hours daily. Obviously, these commuters commuting 2 to 3 hours every day on soot blowing diesel buses are much more sustainable than someone who lives in Vancouver and either cycles, drives or walks about 30 minutes to 60 minutes daily in Vancouver.

Today was a beautiful day. I was waiting at the curb of a parking lane on my bike for the light to change on Hornby near the building that fell down. Another cyclist was on my left in the bike lane. Some idiot driver in a cheap compact car started honking at us for being on his road. He was upset because we were in his way as he attempted to illegally squeeze in between the bike lane and the parking space (we both were in shock at what this moron was attempting). I called him stupid and the other cyclist who was much younger and well over 6’ in height told him to calm down for raving like lunatic at us. It seems that you are just as stupid, out of shape and ignorant as your friend in the car this morning.
2
0
Rating: +2
BikerCK
@Ray

When you restrict downtown cycling to only those young, confident male cyclists who are unafraid to risk their lives mingling with inattentive drivers, many of whom are ignoring important laws such as the new cellphone rules (I see it every time I leave the house) then you are discriminating against people. This country doesn't work that way. Would we allow the Seawall to only be restricted to the fastest joggers or rollerbladers? Of course not. Our public space should be open to everyone, of all ages, and if there are safety issues they should be addressed rather than access restricted.

As to side streets... that's not where the businesses and places of employment are. Put yourself in the shows of a young woman trying to get to her job or school, or a parent who needs to drop off their child at a downtown school or daycare. They shouldn't be handcuffed to the steering wheel of a car, or contributing to bus overcrowding when there is a simple, safe, and affordable solution -- repurposing a single lane here and there among the hundreds that crisscross the downtown core. As for shopping, adding bike lanes will add potential customers to any street. A forward-thinking business would be embracing this idea, and many are.
1
3
Rating: -2
foc17
Lots of people carry lots of stuff on their bikes. When I look at cyclists on the Dunsmuir lanes, most of them have a pannier, backpack, or carrier with stuff in them.

And people go out of their way to use Dunsmuir. Me included. It is just so safe and convenient.
2
2
Rating: 0
Ray I
My comments were not that NO cyclists spend money downtown, just that they are not sufficient in numbers to warrant the cost and inconvenience to motorists. This City Council is not trying to enhance cyclists experiences while minimizing the impact on the greater population they are ramming anti-car initiatives down our throats and they will pay come election day. Believe me. The make-up of City Council will be different after the next civic election. Mark my words!
2
1
Rating: +1
cycling new cool! TransLink you suck!
Cycling is the new cool. When you see all the fit people cycling in the morning you think, wow, I could get off that TransLink lousy loser cruiser, too!

Good-bye smelly person who hasn't taken a bath in months, good-bye obnoxious self-absorbed teenage girl shouting to her friend on the cell phone, good-bye pan-handlers harassing you for coins, good-bye stuffy stale transit air, good-bye sucky TransLink!

I’m not going to take it anymore. I’m not going to become a fat lazy transit user. I’m not going to tolerate the weirdoes and creeps on transit anymore!
2
1
Rating: +1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.