Vancouver approves Mount Pleasant rezoning application

Comments

Vancouver city council voted today (April 17) to approve a controversial rezoning application for a 19-storey tower and multi-use complex at East Broadway and Kingsway.

As opponents of the Mount Pleasant project watched from the public gallery, council members voted to impose some restrictions on the project, including requiring the developer to work with staff to improve the aesthetics of the building.

The motion was supported 9-1, with an abstention from Coun. Tim Stevenson, who missed part of the hearing. Green party councillor Adriane Carr, who cast the sole vote against the proposal, argued that the tower goes against the community plan for the neighbourhood, which identifies three sites in the area for taller buildings.

“It identified mid-rise and high-rise, and then it further identified two specific sites, not this one, around language referring to high-rise,” she told reporters. “Which can only lead you to assume that this was intended to be mid-rise, as the community has said.”

Mayor Gregor Robertson said in a statement issued following council’s decision that the project does fit with the Mount Pleasant community plan, and also meets council’s goal for transit-oriented development.

“Transit-oriented development is a top priority for this council and a key piece for our city right now, and this site sits on one of the busiest transit nodes in B.C.,” Robertson told council.

“In the century to come, I think we’ll see this area continue to change, and the need to think long-term and ensure that we have lots of housing on the transit node is really crucial.”

Council’s vote today followed six nights of public hearings on the proposal, during which council heard from 139 speakers. The majority of community members who spoke at the hearings were opposed to the project, including members of the Residents Association Mount Pleasant (RAMP).

Randy Chatterjee, the director of RAMP, argued the design of the high-rise building makes it “impossible to make this affordable”.

“That building form doesn’t lend itself in any way, shape, or form to an affordable structure,” he told the Straight. “By going that high, you’re forcing yourself into the luxury condo business.”

In addition to the tower, the multi-use complex will include two five-storey buildings and a nine-storey building. The developer offered a $6.25-million community amenity contribution to the city in exchange for the increased density, consisting of $4.5 million for cultural use within Mount Pleasant and $1.75 million for the city’s affordable-housing fund.

Comments (16) Add New Comment
john smith
Ka-ching!! Vision Vancouver cashes in again.
2
3
Rating: -1
Edward Conservativehands
Good on RAMP, especially for focusing on affordabiltiy.

Now it's time to RAMP things up against Vizion Vancouver!
2
4
Rating: -2
Chantal
Shame on Vision Vancouver. Rize gave Vision $10,950 and now they sold out the community in return. Shame.
2
4
Rating: -2
Michelle S of Mt Pleasant
I have said it before and I will say it again.....the laws must be changed, it must become illegal for politicians to receive funding for their campaigns from Developers. How in the world can one expect a fair and honest decision from someone (Greogor and fellow Vision Councillors) who received thousands of dollars from Developers, including Rize Alliance?

Well my fellow Vancouverites, Democracy is Dead and Dictatorship is alive and well in Vancouver.
2
3
Rating: -1
hollister california
"in the century to come..." ha! wishful thinking! we won't last that long, get your head outta yer ass gregor, we'll implode well before that. get your developer kickbacks before the bubble bursts. you almost lost it with the olympic village, dont lose it here, eh?
3
4
Rating: -1
Bodacious
Dear Mayor Robertson and Vision Vancouver Council:

You suck.
2
4
Rating: -2
Lee Chapelle
The Mount Pleasant Community Planning Program Rezoning Policy adopted by Council in April 2007 states that a rezoning must adhere to two principles, the second of which is that no rezoning may "prempt or divert the community planning program by rezonings which set new directions.." This document is available on the City's website. The Rize rezoning application was officially accepted in July 2010, setting a new high water mark in height and density for developments in Mount Pleasant. The Mount Pleasant Community Plan was not adopted by City Council until November, 2010. Therefore this rezoning is in direct violation of the Mount Pleasant Community Planning Program Rezoning Policy, I say this just for information, this Vision Council could not care less that their staff are not abiding by existing Land Use Policies and Guidelines,
1
3
Rating: -2
VancouverFor$ale
Vision is obviously money hungry & in the developers pockets. 80% of locals were against this proposal and Vision didn't remotely try to come to a compromise. They could have easily reduced the height 5 floors or so & accordingly reduced the community benefit, not a big deal, but nooooo.
Vision has LOST my vote!
2
3
Rating: -1
Ripley
So glad that this went through, and I hope it sets a precedent for significantly more (and taller) development outside the downtown core. Get over it, NIMBYs.
2
3
Rating: -1
RealityCheck
Shame on these Nimby elitists for trying to block more housing for Vancouverites! If they had their way, they'd dig a moat around their little hipster neighborhood to keep everyone else out. I hope Rize sells out on Day One!
2
2
Rating: 0
Lee Chapelle
@Ripley, if you love skyscrapers so much why don't you live in False Creek? What, you can't afford it? hmmmm connecting the dots yet Einstein?
0
1
Rating: -1
Taxpayers R Us
A number of people in Quebec - including at least one politician - were just arrested for corruption involving the construction industry.

I'm thinking it's time to take a very hard look at Vision, it's developer funding, and whatever other perks they're entitled to for working on behalf of developers.

Our tax dollars should be paying for governing and listening to the public, not working for corporations and Americans.
1
1
Rating: 0
RealityCheck
Bottom line...if you don't like living in a CITY, move.

Period.
0
0
Rating: 0
yesdothis
Towers are more about views than density. Seems like everyone wants to stare at the mountains from their little anonymous boxes.
1
1
Rating: 0
Paul Kubik
The farce is that Vancouver voted for these clowns by a huge majority. The alternative NPA is no better. Where is COPE when it's needed? (Answer, grovelling up Vision's behind.) Should've voted for the No Growth Party to send a clear message.
1
0
Rating: +1
R U Kiddingme
I am for Rize and signed up for it on paper (under my real name, even) but this approval news doesn't seem like news, in that, is it surprising? Have any applications failed?
1
1
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.