Vancouver city staff recommend keeping downtown bike lanes

Comments

A staff report going before Vancouver city council next week recommends making the separated bike lanes downtown permanent.

Poll

Should the separated bike lanes on Hornby Street, Dunsmuir Street, and the Dunsmuir Viaduct be made permanent?

Yes 71%
188 votes
No 24%
64 votes
Unsure 4%
11 votes

The separated lanes on Dunsmuir Street, the Dunsmuir Viaduct, Hornby Street and connecting streets were approved on a trial basis in 2010.

According to the staff report, the lanes have led to “both immediate and sustained growth of cycling on these routes”.

The report shows a 19 percent increase in annual bicycle trips on the Dunsmuir Viaduct between April 2011 and March 2012, compared to the previous year. The permanent bike lanes on the Burrard Bridge are seeing the most bicycle traffic, with 51,000 trips recorded in March 2012, compared to 26,000 on the Dunsmuir Viaduct. Dunsmuir Street saw 32,000 trips during the same month, and 22,000 bike trips were recorded on Hornby Street.

Ongoing maintenance of the existing downtown separated bike lanes is expected to cost about $50,000 in annual operating costs.

City staff are also looking at additional safety modifications to the downtown lanes over the next few years, including signal or other changes at vehicle right-turn lanes, and raising sections of the Dunsmuir separated bike lanes “to improve accessibility for vehicle passengers”.

The report will go to the city’s planning, transportation and environment committee next Wednesday (June 13).

Comments (7) Add New Comment
out at night
Great, now all we need is some secure bike parking downtown and we'd see a huge increase in bike traffic. Bike Stations, please! Secure, tamper-proof bike parking (yes, I want to park my bike and NOT have to shlep my helmet, panniers, lights, pump, wet rain gear, seat, seatpost, etc.), some pay-per-use showers, maybe even a place to buy a coffee and snack, washrooms, a few bike stands, floor pumps, tools...

The CoV is still waiting for private enterprise to lead the way, but news-flash: there will always be another cell phone store, Starbucks or cheque-cashing place put there instead. Bike stations are not a sure thing, but one thing is sure: without them, we will be fighting to keep our bike lanes just the second a reactionary city council is elected. Which will happen in the next election or three.
0
0
Rating: 0
trixie
The bike lanes are great. I use them all the time. We do need an east-west lane going from Hornby into the West End and Stanley Park.

Thank you City of Vancouver.
1
0
Rating: +1
out at night
@trixie
Helmcken/Comox greenway - coming soon - should be just the ticket!
0
3
Rating: -3
Bicylce rights!
Glad to hear it. Use the Dunsmuir bike lane daily. We need a West to East bike lane through the downtown core though. Going against the wave of green along Dunsmuir is hopeless on a bike.
0
0
Rating: 0
MarkBowen
Great to hear it.

I suspect anyone in opposition to these separated lanes has never actually tried to use them.
0
0
Rating: 0
Zoobzoob La Zoob
I think it's one of the best things to happen to the city in a long time. I suspect the city is learning how to make these things better as the Hornby one is much more pleasant than the Dunsmuir one. Some of the things on Hornby, such as different timing for right turn signals, should become standard all over town. No more waiting for the pedestrians to cross to make a right turn as every mode has it's time.

The intersection of Dunsmuir and Hornby is still awkward and it's unclear just what to do. This has been figured out in Europe years ago, they should have a look at how it's done there. Maybe they'll get some tips from Europeans at the Velo City conference coming up.

So, yay! I love living in a city that's situated in the modern world and not digging in their heels trying to make an outdated thing from the past still work.
0
0
Rating: 0
Save Vancouver
I am shocked, shocked I tell you, that Vision Vancouver's "trial" bike lanes were approved. Whoever would have thought it, I mean just because the bulldozers were running before council even voted on the trial....
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.