Vancouver housing activists plan to set up another tent city
An organizer of a protest that was shut down by police at the former Olympic Village site on Saturday says housing activists are determined to set up their tent city again.
“We’re definitely planning on coming back twice as strong, and bigger and better,” Vancouver Action organizer Nathan Crompton said in a phone interview. “We’re feeling stronger than we ever have felt.”
Protestors walked from the Downtown Eastside to the former athletes’ village Saturday (February 26) afternoon and began setting up tents in the central plaza of the complex. After being told to leave the city property, the activists moved their tents to an empty lot across the street, followed by a heavy police presence.
Not long after setting up on that site, Crompton said activists were told by police to leave the private property. A group of about a dozen activists then occupied an empty storefront, which Crompton described as a “vast” retail space.
“This empty space in the Olympic Village could house a vast number of people,” he said. “The area of the space is in my estimation larger than every shelter in this city combined.”
Eleven protestors occupying the site were later arrested and taken to the police station. By late Saturday night, the group was released.
Crompton said while a location hasn’t yet been determined, organizers plan to set up another tent city.
The housing activists want to see the original plan for two-thirds of social housing at the site restored.
“We’ll continue making the same demands that we’ve made, which is an immediate moratorium on the sell-off of promised social housing units at the Olympic Village,” Crompton said, noting activists are also calling for social housing throughout the city.
“In this city, we’re thousands of units behind,” said Crompton. “We need to make up for 10 years of market development and gentrification and lack of affordable housing.”
While two-thirds of the former athlete’s village complex, which was recently renamed The Village on False Creek, was designated as affordable housing in the site’s original plan, the number of units reserved for social housing was since decreased to 126. Another 126 units are being rented out at market rates, with priority given to essential workers such as first responders, and health care and public education workers.
According to Thom Armstrong, the executive director of the Co-operative Housing Federation of British Columbia, 45 units in two of the city-owned rental buildings have so far been rented out, including 16 market rental units for essential workers. These units are moving slower than anticipated, although Armstrong said interest has picked up since the recent relaunch of condo sales at the village.
The non-market units range in price from $375 a month to about $1,200, while rates for the market units range from $1501 for a one-bedroom condo to $2368 for a four-bedroom unit.
An information session for a building designated for co-op housing will be held in the next couple of weeks. Armstrong said the goal is to fill 100 of the market and below-market rental units by the end of March.






How many units must be built to solve the problem? Who gets to live in them? For how long? At what expense in maintenance and operation? At what expense in construction? Why shouldn't taxpayers get free housing too?
Those who demand social housing "for all" never talk about the endgame. They never talk about obligation -- only 'entitlement'.
If we build 10,000 units in Vancouver, will we attract ten thousand who will come for the good weather and the free housing? Vancouver cannot go it alone. An effective policy must be a national policy. Otherwise, we will create an unaffordable and unsustainable mecca in SW Canada.
Those who demand social housing "for all" must answer a simple question: when is enough enough? If there is no end in sight, we're not buying it.
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/946404--ford-to-clean-house-at-tchc-...
Short video of Olympic Village Tent City. I was impressed the the fresh and enthusiastic faces of young people getting involved in the political process which includes protests. http://www.creativetechnology.org/video/video/listForContributor?screenN...
@Micheal Geller - what harm to social housing in protesting broken promises and debt?
@Peter Parker - a lot of people who pay taxes want more affordable and social housing
@NDB - good you can afford living in Vancouver. Issue is more lack of national housing strategy...
@Sven Crawson - we (residents of Vancouver) are all winners because the Tent City partcipants organise and exercise their rights. It's called participation in political process...
@
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipg8iJJpuj0
I'd be shocked if the guy who threw the brick through the window of the Bay store during the Olympics isn't in this tent city holding out for his right to a waterfront view condo at the Olympic Village.
My comment has nothing to do with what I can or can not afford. Certainlty there is more I want to have in life, but I dont ask others to provide it.
I pay taxes and I want a reasonable amount of social housing. I dont think social housing at waterfront locations is needed, I dont even think its needed in the center of Vancouver which is extremely sought after. One social unit, is one taken away from someone who works and wants to live downtown.
I think social housing should be spread out in areas affordable to develop. I think it should come with an element of accountability and those who use it should "give back" in some way.
When will it ever be enough? When everyone has a house? Then what...protest people should have bigger houses, or a garage? Why not social cars too?!
Stop fighting for this "place". Let Vancouver become what it was destined to be: an international urban resort. We'll all commute in from Surrey to build and maintain the luxary real estate, casinos, and high-end retail. It sucks to be displaced from your community, but that's global capitalism for ya.
Why do these unemployed/underemployed/lazy protesters not get it? You don't demand from those of us who sacrifice for what we have those things that you have not earned. No one is in favour of homelessness. Most average Vancouverites want to help people who have no place to live. But why are they so unrealistic and unreasonable. We are being reasonable in agreeing to pay for housing but that is not enough you. And you wonder why you are not being successful in converting us to support your cause?
Well get a clue. We don't support our deficit borrowed tax dollars spent on housing the homeless in accommodations that we can't even afford. Your protesting this just makes you look greedy and out of touch with those of us who pay the bills.
Mayne we should set up picket lines in front of all the Ministry of Social Service offices on Welfare Wednesday so you don't get paid, then move over to all the agencies that we support through charity giving and block the access to free food and clothing. Maybe your ilk just need to be taught a lesson!
http://criminalnationnews.blogspot.com/
These self-entitled class warfare types are a bore. Furthermore, they further marginalize the very people they pretend to advocate.
They want to live -- for free - in deluxe waterfront housing.
They want to live -- for free -- in housing that 85% of the taxpayers could never afford to live in.
They want to live -- for free -- at an address that those of us who pay taxes could never dream of living in.
Why should we subsidize your fantasies? If I can work hard all my life to buy my own home, why should I pay for yours? You want to much. You contribute to little.
There doesn't seem to be any limit to your willingness to live off my hard work, at an address I could never afford. No way, Jose.
Pages