Vancouver lawyer Gail Davidson seeks Dick Cheney's arrest
Dick Cheney is coming to town on September 26 to promote his book In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir. But Vancouver lawyer Gail Davidson has other plans for one of the most controversial figures of the modern era, a powerful man who publicly admitted having allowed torture.
The cofounder of the international group Lawyers Against the War wants the government of Canada either to bar the former U.S. vice president from entering the country or, if he’s allowed in, to arrest and prosecute him for torture, war offences, and crimes against humanity. And if Canada isn’t keen on punishing the ex–vice president to former president George W. Bush, Davidson argues, then it should extradite Cheney to a country that is willing and able to prosecute him.
One of the most vocal defenders of U.S. foreign policy, specifically the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, Cheney is the first featured speaker in the 2011–12 series of Vancouver’s Bon Mot Book Club.
“It’s a bit chilling that they would invite a mass murderer as their guest to Canada,” Davidson told the Georgia Straight by phone, “when any one of them would know full well that because of the founded accusations made against Mr. Cheney, that he’s persona non grata in Canada, being accused of international crimes, torture, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.”
Organizer Leah Costello explained that the Bon Mot Book Club is an “intimate and exclusive high-end dinner series”, wherein her company Curious Mind Productions Inc. brings in world leaders and other high-profile speakers. Cheney will speak at a dinner event at the Vancouver Club.
“I haven’t heard anything yet,” Costello told the Straight by phone, when asked if she expects protests to greet Cheney. “But I have heard that he’s a controversial figure. That’s for sure.”
In a recent NBC interview, Cheney declared that he had “no regrets” that the American government used torture against terrorism suspects.
Asked if the U.S. should still use widely condemned techniques like waterboarding, Cheney responded: “I would strongly support using it again if circumstances arose where we had a high-value detainee and that was the only way we could get him to talk.”
According to Davidson, the government is obliged under local and international laws—such as the United Nations’ Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment—to deny safe haven and prosecute persons accused of crimes like torture. Davidson is writing Prime Minister Stephen Harper and key cabinet ministers to outline evidence against the Bush administration and its senior officials.
“The role of Mr. Cheney is that he authorized, directed, ordered, supervised, and failed to prevent the commission of a wide range of crimes against humanity and war crimes,” Davidson said.
She has previously written to the government, suggesting steps similar to those regarding Cheney be taken when Bush visits Surrey on October 20. The ex-president has been invited by Mayor Diane Watts to the Surrey Regional Economic Summit.
In her letter dated August 25 regarding Bush’s visit, Davidson cited a transcript of a U.S. interview with Cheney in May 2009, in which Cheney stated that Bush authorized torture. He said: “I mean it was a presidential-level decision. And the decision went to the president. He signed off on it.”
Speaking to the Straight, Davidson said that the evidence against the Bush administration is well known and part of the public record. The documentation contained in Davidson’s August 25 letter includes a statement from now retired U.S. army Maj.-Gen. Antonio Taguba, who looked into abuses at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison. Taguba stated that “the Commander-in-Chief [Bush] and those under him authorized a systematic regime of torture”.
The Vancouver lawyer also cited a 2004 report by the International Committee of the Red Cross that the American military used interrogation techniques amounting to torture on prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, a U.S. naval base in Cuba. She likewise mentioned a 2007 Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly report that spoke about a “whole series of illegal acts in Europe” by the CIA through “extraordinary rendition”, a practice in which individuals are abducted from one country and sent to another, to be detained and tortured for information in secret locations.
Davidson stressed that when Canada ratified the international convention against torture, it accepted a duty not just to Canadians but to everyone. And that is to “take effective measures to prevent and punish torture wherever it occurs, whatever the nationality of the victims are, and whatever the nationality of the perpetrators”.




Lawyers Against The War's letter to the prime minister

All this "examination" you and your ilk desire plays very well into the hands of those that mean us harm. They really don't need to expend too much time, money and effort when you will do their dirty work for them.
For a true appreciation of life as it is, not some pretend world, I would recommend moving to Iran and demanding the full investigation of the government and jailing of their leaders. See how far that gets you.
Have the rose coloured glasses surgically removed and grow up, it's a tough world out there and as dispicable as it may be we need tough guys to deal with the bad guys.
He should be given a medal.
Excuse me while I go play Cowboys'n'Indians. Way more fun than NATO'n'Non-NATO---at least the Cowboys fought somewhat fair, didn't use an airforce.
Look at the number of "people" who came here after WWII from that Axis Country, nothing happened to them.
I don't see the solid legal ground in CANADIAN LAW either.
No Country will go against the US to prosecute one of it's top officials. The US either Democrat or Republican will never allow it.
They (the USA) are not pussies like Canadian Governments.
That is why they are strong and we are weak whiners.
Best of luck with that Gail & Co.
Do you think this is why the US (under Bush/Cheney) refused to join the International Criminal Court?
The right wants Omar Khadr out and Dick Cheney in.
People capable of stringing together even the tiniest of intellectual brain synapses want both out.
George W Bush avoids handcuffs in Switzerland: http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/feb/06/george-bush-trip-to-switzerland
Donald Rumsfeld avoids Germany: http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/fugitive_rumsfeld_cancels_german_trip/
In case anyone was wondering, subsection 3 of 269.1 notes their is no Defence "(3) It is no defence to a charge under this section that the accused was ordered by a superior or a public authority to perform the act or omission that forms the subject-matter of the charge or that the act or omission is alleged to have been justified by exceptional circumstances, including a state of war, a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency."
"Chaney is not a nice guy, granted, but he did what he did to protect his people as he saw fit, with the tools at his disposal."
Your statement would ring much more true if it wasn't for the fact that Cheney made a handsome buck while "defending" Americans.
RickW
Oh, they didn't? Why not? Too dangerous? Too far? Or just...inconvenient?
Hypocrites. Easy to take an oh-so-principled stand against a target that won't attack them back, but too cowardly to go up against the really scary ones that feed victims feet first into a woodchipper, or cut their heads off slowly with a skinning knife.
I'm sure they'll be patting each other on the back on the wine-and-cheese circuit, but I wonder if they'll have the guts to go up against the Secret Service bodyguards that accompany a former Vice President.
I will keep this simple and brief as I hope to get a response. My question is very specific.
The past month or two has seen the publishing of the names of accused war criminals. They have been allegedly involved in the mass killings and torture of many. While I may disagree with some aspects and implementation, such as basing arrest on pure allegation, the premise is noble.
An opportunity has arisen to take down a clearly self-admitted war criminal that is voluntarily coming to Canada. Richard Cheney has admitted to, among other things, approving the torture of prisoners via water-boarding. The fact that water-boarding is torture is not subject to reasonable debate outside of Orwellian language. Japanese prisoners were hanged after WW2 for this exact crime.(1)
Sir, why is an admitted war criminal allowed on our soil and treated like an elder statesman?
I understand the diplomatic implications but silence by the Government of Canada is unacceptable. He should face the same fate as Mr. Pinochet. You know this as well as I do if you are using law, as defined by our treaty obligations (2) as our metric for punishment.
Most Sincerely,
SS
1. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2007/dec/18/john-mcca...
2. http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html
Email your MP.
Pages