Vancouver park board has a lot to learn about enhancing media access

Comments

It's sometimes said that local government is the most democratic form of politics because it's closest to the people.

Photos

Whoever believes that old saying has probably never been to the Vancouver park board.

Tonight, I drove down to the commissioners meeting in Stanley Park with two major objectives.

I was hoping to cover the debate over the future of golf courses. I also wanted to write about a motion dealing with disinfection systems for local pools.

One irritant about covering the park board is the parking fees. Unlike Metro Vancouver's boardroom or Vancouver city council, the park board is quite inaccessible by transit.

It costs $3 per hour to park near the board office, so if the meeting drags on, it can get expensive. The staff will give members of the media parking passes if they ask. But on a busy night like tonight, my car was so far from the board office that I was not in the mood to spend more time hoofing it back and forth, only to miss some of the discussions. I've left the last two meetings before they ended because my car would have been towed.

That's a fairly minor frustration compared to the other barriers this evening inhibiting proper media coverage.

When I arrived, the room was jammed to such a level that someone should have called the fire marshal's office.

The media table was occupied by some people who were not reporters. And journalists were sitting on the floor. Some members of the public were seated against the far wall.

There was no way of setting up a laptop, let alone finding a decent space to jot down notes. I can't ever recall seeing a park board meeting with this many people in the room. Of course, there was no loudspeaker in the hall for people outside of the room.

The park board has moved the committee meeting ahead of the regular board meeting. This means that the agenda is longer, which attracts a larger audience and contributes to overcrowding.

I was also thrown a curveball when the board moved the discussion on swimming pools to the committee. I had arrived expecting to be in the middle of public presentations on golf courses. But lo and behold, I had been sideswiped by the switcheroo, leaving me unable to properly report on the possibility of commissioners spending millions of dollars on pools.

Surely, the commissioners could have made this decision early enough to post on the agenda on the board's website. But they obviously didn't think this was worth doing.

I happen to like using a Flip camera to record politicians' debates. The sound quality is good and it gives visitors to Straight.com an opportunity to hear unfiltered discussions between their elected representatives.

But prior to tonight's meeting, the staff had jammed an extra row of seats at the front to accommodate the crowd. This meant there was very little room for me to manoeuvre with my video camera to record discussions.

Unlike city council, the park board has never put a camera in the room and posted videotaped debates on the Internet for voters to see. If there had been a camera like the one that exists in the council chamber, I would have been able to track the debate from my office and arrive on time for the swimming-pool discussion.

At one point, the park board's general manager, Malcolm Bromley, told me that I wasn't allowed to move around to record the discussion. He said there's a rule that a person can't get closer than two feet from commissioners to videotape. But I couldn't stay more than two feet away because the extra row of seats created too small of a space between the gallery and the board table.

In effect, the park-board boss was telling me that I couldn't capture what commissioners Aaron Jasper and John Coupar were saying, based on where they were sitting.

I was furious because I felt it was a violation of my constitutional right to freedom of the media under Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I muttered under my breath to the park board's communications manager, Joyce Courtney, that this was "horseshit", which was perhaps a little intemperate on my part.

It's not the first time that senior park staff have demonstrated a lack of concern about the constitutional right to freedom of expression. Prior to the referendum on the harmonized sales tax, the park board's managers wouldn't permit canvassers registered with Elections B.C. to sit quietly in community centres and collect signatures. (That was overturned after the Straight wrote a story about this.)

At the time, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association interpreted this fiat to be a clear violation of the charter right to freedom of expression. The president, Robert Holmes, and the executive director, David Eby, based their conclusion on rulings from the Supreme Court of Canada.

I wonder if the B.C. Civil Liberties Association might feel that the general manager's refusal to allow me to videotape part of the commissioners' discussion violated my charter right under Section 2(b).

I left the room to cool down, knowing that probably none of the commissioners or the senior staff were aware of the three major Supreme Court of Canada rulings dealing with freedom of expression. If they're curious, they can send me an email and I'll provide the links.

One of the people in the room, Raymond Tomlin, later told me that Bromley asked Courtney who my editor was. Little did the general manager know I am the editor of the Georgia Straight, so any complaints would have to be directed to me.

When I returned to the meeting, I mentioned to Coupar that the general manager was preventing me from videotaping what he had to say.

Bromley suddenly became more gracious. He said I could walk to the back of the room to videotape people who were speaking to the board.

But I realized that this still wouldn't enable me to move laterally in front of the board to record debates between commissioners.

The real problem was the extra row of seats. They were necessary on this evening because the Vision-controlled board had dropped a bombshell about reviewing golf courses. This came shortly after the Vision mayor, Gregor Robertson, expressed an openness to developing housing on the Langara links.

Another problem is the shape of the table in the park boardroom. It's round, so the commissioners sit in a circle. Some have their backs to the audience, preventing people in the gallery from videotaping what they have to say.

The media table is off by the window, making it impossible to see the faces of some commissioners at certain times.

This barrier doesn't exist at Vancouver City Hall, where all the politicians' faces can be seen from the media table.

In the hallway, I asked Courtney if she could give a demonstration of where I could walk inside the boardroom to record commissioners' debates. She kept repeating that the general manager said it was okay for me to use my video camera. She wouldn't walk into the room with me to let me have a demonstration.

Courtney also claimed that I sat at the board table. I never once plopped myself in a chair. However, I was crouched down near the table, mainly because there was no room for me to move backward.

The end result of Bromley's directive was that I couldn't move laterally to record the discussion. And the seat that I was given in the gallery made it impossible to properly videotape Coupar and Jasper.

On the upside, Comm. Sarah Blyth managed to get me a seat at the media table after I brought some of my concerns to her attention.

However, this problem with videotaping will persist because commissioners and senior staff at the park board have not given sufficient thought to how to enhance public access to debates in an era when average people have the ability to videotape what's said and post the footage online.

Bromley was paid $216,989 last year. I would argue that for this wage, the public should expect him to be able to organize a meeting in accordance with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

If the general manager takes exception to that final comment, he's welcome to send a complaint to the editor.

Better yet, Bromley could fill in the comment form below and offer a vision for how he plans to make it easier for any member of the public to videotape commissioners at their regularly scheduled board meetings.

Related story: Video: Aaron Jasper denies that he spoke to the mayor about his motion on golf courses


Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.

Comments (15) Add New Comment
Andrew
Vi$ion $erves developer$.
This is why they want to sell off the golf courses to their campaign contributor friends.
4
1
Rating: +3
Jim B.
I couldn't agree more about the complete lack of concern towards citizens from the Parks Board. I couldn't see the faces of some of the Commissioners due to the round table. The proposal to allow seating on the roof of the American owned Boathouse Kits Beach restaurant, for no additonal rent (small percentage instead) was presented by the Parks Board to the audience, not the restaurant. The Parks Board had become advocate, not judge. I was allowed a few minutes to address the Parks Board in relation to the patio expansion, and brought up some pretty valid problems with their application - that it was Boathouse who conducted the survey to see approval rates, that they conducted only one acoustic sound level check at 3:30PM on a weekday (the slowest time in a restaurant), that 'bather's at beaches have a right to quiet enjoyment of their beaches, that the patio allowing alcohol was mere meters away from a children's playground, that the rent Boathouse was paying was less than an east Vancouver basement, that no additional rent was to be collected from the additional 56 seat balcony, etc etc. There was not one question or comment from a Commissioner. They immediately voted, without any pause, discussion, or query, as if it didn't matter in the least what I and other residents said. Then the Parks Board commissioners and Boathose execs congratulated each other and shook hands. I felt like, and received comments from visitors, that I was the one trying to protect the beaches from unnecessary commercialism, not the other way around.
2
1
Rating: +1
Anita Romaniuk
Strange. When I was vice-chair, the Province published a pic taken at a Park Board meeting that was obviously taken by a photographer or reporter directly behind me (nice shot of my hair) - that would be at the front of the room! No one tried to stop or hustle out the reporter!
3
1
Rating: +2
George Pool
Not to mention blatantly attacking the media for taking seriously some crazy thing the mayor said! The media have a tendency of blowing things out of the water - Trevor Loke & Constance Barnes

THE MAYOR SAID HE WAS GOING TO BUILD CONDOS ON ALL THE PARKS!!!
1
2
Rating: -1
monty/that'sme
Charlie, it is said that laughter is the best therapy of all. Thanks for starting my day with your tale about this GONG SHOW When one stops laughing, one realizes how taxpayers money is wasted.

Years ago I covered a story for the GS when the West Point Grey Academy wanted to expand onto the beach, take over the Youth Hostel space, and built some gargantuan structure. The Hostel group was well organized...they had heard from 90 of its members who were noticeably opposed. So were some important folks from UBC, and ordinary citizens. At one point a man snuck out of the room. I followed him. He turned out to be the lawyer for the WPGA group. He commented that "he never expected anything like this." Shortly thereafter deGenova left the room.

They had a lengthy chat in that area behind the desks outside the meeting room. Ta da..Guess who was trying to manipulate the scam?

Too bad you did not check outside. Sometimes one learns more by
seeking out the scalawags. Same applies to Council and Metro Board meetings.

Fortunately you can deduct those ludicrous parking fees as a business expense. Little wonder why we 99 %-ers don't go to Vancouver.
2
1
Rating: +1
JamieLee
While I was happy to see the turn-out of people who were aghast that our Park Board was entertaining the idea of changing our public golf courses to private use, I was very troubled how news editor Charlie Smith was treated by senior high rankng park board staff. Never before have I seen this where staff were trying to control properly accredited media. This is shocking because this move by General Manager Malcolm Bromley and Communications Officer Joyce Courtney besides being disrespectful to Mr Smith also interferes with the democratic process of transparency in public meetings and the reporting of them. Park Board Chair Sarah Blyth must immediately address this issue.
3
1
Rating: +2
Sin Nombre
I believe most of these meetings have been hashed out elsewhere and consensus has been reached before the public 'get their say'. The committees go through the motions to play it out before the public and media alike, shake hands and go their separate ways. Being seen to be doing it right, they don't want the public to have their say lets face it, as there are too many concerns that do not fit into the greater picture. Oh and time's money!
2
2
Rating: 0
DJ Lam
It's about time someone in the media vented spleen about what barriers are far too often encountered.

The public ultimately loses when the media's ability to execute its responsibility to disseminate information from public forums.

When I covered municipal committees, meetings and the like, there were often b.s. barriers that would arise. A personal favourite involved being told I couldn't take any notes during a city committee meeting where public consultation was being held.

In some cities, senior staff were far too slick in PR magic and managed bewildered herds of journalists like cattle -- especially when more media than the usual suspects would show up. This is naturally corrosive with regard to the public interest.

In the alternative, it was worse when staff didn't appear to understand the media's responsibility to the public.
1
2
Rating: -1
Salty one
Treat the media like the enemy and that's exactly what they'll become.
2
2
Rating: 0
Chris M
I have no doubt that some, or many, of your concerns are valid, but when you start the article by complaining about not wanting to "hoof it" to and from your car, it tilts a little into entitlement. I don't know you, and so shouldn't probably say such things, but while I'm sympathetic to your views, my main thought reading this was "get over yourself".
2
1
Rating: +1
cuz
I agree with Chris. This seems like a lot of whining. And Charter rights violations? It's ridiculous claims like this that lowers the validity of all claims. As for the park board not having meetings streamed online - well, that would cost a lot of money. And no doubt, the Straight would be the first to complain about them going over budget. But hey, the Straight is always first to complain and whine.
0
1
Rating: -1
Hans Goldberg
I would suggest a 50 % pay cut for all public service managers. There is no justification for these salaries.
0
1
Rating: -1
monty/that'sme
I guess Chris and cuz don't know about Charlie. He is an avid bike rider. Used to ride to and from work involving great distances. Chris, get a sense of humour. Since you don't know this editor, perhaps you should take your own advice and "get over yourself!"

cuz it sounds like you are one of the 240 fabricators working in the communications department of the present government. There are specific standards for the treatment of journalists. These rules are meant to enhance their work. Obviously you know nothing about the subject.

Perhaps you two should take a walk off a long pier...
1
1
Rating: 0
Save Vancouver
@Salty One-Then why is most of the mainstream media still fawning over Mayor Moonbeam? And what paper had that jaunty little photo of Constance Barnes all dolled up for bike riding?

And Charlie, I wouldn't label the 2 1/2 blocks from Denman to the Parks Board "inacessible" by transit!
0
0
Rating: 0
Cuz
Hey Monty, I like how when people disagree with you, they are always wrong. It is a nice day to jump off the end of a pier. Thanks for the suggestion. Oh yeah, get over yourself.
1
1
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.