Vancouver's separated bike lanes should cut cycling injuries dramatically

Comments

Separated bike lanes, such as those installed in recent years in downtown Vancouver, result in about one-tenth the injury rate for cyclists compared to major thoroughfares with parked cars and no bike infrastructure, according to a recent UBC study.

The research project looked at 690 cycling injuries in Toronto and Vancouver during the years 2008 and 2009.

Different kinds of routes and infrastructures came under scrutiny in the study, which was published in the American Journal of Public Health on October 18.

Compared to major routes like Broadway in Vancouver and Dundas Street in Toronto, with no bike lanes and with parked cars presenting dangers from opening doors, infrastructure such as residential bike lanes and bike lanes on busy streets without parked cars presented only half the risk.

But the lowest risk came from cycle tracks, or physically separated bike lanes, like those on Hornby and Dunsmuir streets in Vancouver, with only 10 percent of the danger.

In a news release distributed on the study’s publishing date, and less than two weeks before the annual Bike to Work Week (October 29 to November 2), lead author and UBC professor Kay Teschke said that cycle tracks, although popular in Northern European cities where cycling is prevalent, “have been slow to catch on in North America”.

“Adoption of safer route infrastructure would prevent crashes from occurring in the first place, while encouraging cycling,” said Teschke, who teaches in the university’s school of population and public health. “Since cycling offers major health benefits, this is a win-win.”

According to Teschke, streetcar and train tracks, more commonly encountered by cyclists in Toronto than in Vancouver, are a major concern.

“There is renewed interest in streetcars for urban transportation, and the associated tracks were found to be especially hazardous for cyclists,” she said in the release.

She added that construction projects also present a risk of injury for those riding bikes. “Safe detours for cyclists need to be provided,” she said.

Comments (6) Add New Comment
Trixie
When good infrastructure goes in, cycling rates increase. This is a good thing for everyone -- better health and less traffic. Congrats to City of Vancouver for providing safe and effective ways for all its taxpayers to travel around the city.
0
0
Rating: 0
R U Kiddingme
Earl, one reason that you see bad behaving cyclists is because of a lack of separated bike lanes. When biking was crazy dangerous, it had appeal largely if not exclusively to the crazy dangerous. That is why you see a lot of remnants of annoying extreme behaviour, e.g. Critical Mass. As separated lanes grow and catch on, you should see more ridership and fewer obnoxious people, proportionally.

In the meantime, I suggest you reflect on whether all car drivers are genteel, accomodating, and safety focused, or if there is such a thing as a car driver who is inconsiderate and who skirts some rules.

As for parking spaces, sure you lost a bunch. But there was never going to be enough parking spaces. The city is trying to encourage new ways of getting to town instead of looking the other way, back at the 1950s.
0
0
Rating: 0
Joe The Musician Not
Get rid of cars, buses, pedestrians and cyclits will be fine.
1
0
Rating: +1
Ian G62
@ RUKM I hardly think the Critical Mass is extreme behaviour - it is what it is.

Now the World Naked Bike Ride [started in Vancouver] there is some extreme cycling !
0
0
Rating: 0
R U Kiddingme
@Ian

I was in San Fran recently and saw a naked guy at their Critical Mass, so I guess there is overlap...

I'd ten times rather see naked people riding than to see riders who are stopping traffic during rush hour, stopping pedestrians who are just trying to cross the street, and being so goddamned contemptuous and holy about it.

It's for riders like that that steamrollers were invented.

They give cyclist the image of self-centered wackos. As a daily cyclist, Critical Mass makes me feel less safe, and I hate them for it.
0
0
Rating: 0
out at night
I did one Critical Mass ride a few years ago and that's it for me. Left a very bad taste due to the power-tripping on display and stuff like that. Didn't we win the downtown? Maybe Critical Mass needs to muster in Surrey from now on, where they actually need more bike lanes and so on. Having it downtown time after time smacks of laziness, lack of imagination and an absence of political savvy.

No steamrollers thanks, but maybe the city of Vancouver and VPD need to ask these folks to literally "move along".
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.