Vision Vancouver pledges to create more studio space for artists

Comments

Vision Vancouver today released a campaign pledge to create 10,000 square feet of new studio space for artists if re-elected on November 19.

City councillor Heather Deal, who is running for re-election with the party, said Vision intends to look at tools including using community amenity contributions from new development and using city-owned buildings to create the new spaces, which would primarily be for visual artists.

Deal said the city’s review of regulations affecting studio spaces could open up opportunities for space in office buildings and industrial land.

“By setting an actual numeric target on studio space, we’re making it clear to the city that studio [space] is a high priority for us, that we’re setting down a number so that we have a very bold target to aim at,” Deal told the Straight by phone.

The pledge to create more arts space follows the recent closure of Red Gate studios on East Hastings Street. The building was shut down permanently following months of efforts to bring the building up to health and safety requirements, after the city issued an order to vacate last spring.

Deal said new regulations created through the regulatory review will lead to “protected use” of artist space.

“Part of the regulation review is defining where legal artist spaces can be, so that when the owner wants to get rid of them, we can say well actually that’s a protected use, and if you kick them out, you have to bring more artists in…Those regulation changes will mean that there’s a lot more space in the city which is legally allowed to be artist space and in fact encouraged to be artist space.”

While Deal said the city is always looking for “affordable” spaces, the artist studios would not be below market rates.

“Unless it’s subsidized, you’re still paying market rent,” said Deal. “We’re not talking about subsidization at this point.”

“So affordability will be based on things like location or size…if we open up the industrial lands, that would be more affordable than studio space in the middle of Kitsilano, for instance," she added.

Deal said the studio spaces would be created over the next three-year term.

A Vision Vancouver funded website called "We Back the Juiceman” was recently launched. The site is described as “creative contributions in support of Mayor Gregor Robertson and Vision Vancouver”.

Another site called “We Don’t Back the Juiceman” was launched in response, billed as a site by artists who don’t support the mayor or NPA mayoral candidate Suzanne Anton. A press release launching the website claimed that: “Over the past three years, rents in Vancouver have skyrocketed and affordable spaces have continued to disappear, making it increasingly difficult to produce art in the city. At present, cultural spaces and artists are forced to rent from slumlords at unaffordable rates in exchange for substandard safety and maintenance standards.”

Today’s arts space announcement comes on the heels of Vision Vancouver’s release of part of its election platform Sunday (October 23).

As part of the platform announcement, Vision committed to policies including: increasing funding for police and fire and rescue services; creating 500 new daycare spaces over the course of the next three years; expanding the city’s food cart program; and creating a new public square downtown.

The same day Vision released its platform plank, COPE city council candidate Tim Louis also announced a commitment to reduce the price of public transportation through a community transit pass.

Election campaign events scheduled for this week include an all-candidates meeting hosted by the False Creek Residents’ Association this evening, a mayoral debate hosted by the Vancouver Board of Trade Tuesday (October 25), and a candidates debate on Wednesday (October 26) on city-wide planning issues, hosted by the Residents Association Mount Pleasant.

Comments (10) Add New Comment
james green
Nice about the arts and casinos. Now tell us Vision what is your plan to deal with crime, gangs, public safety, rising taxes, transit and diesel buses, violence against women, drug addiction, actually housing and treatment for the homeless beyond shelters, social.subsidized housing,
affordable housing, getting the Little Mountain project back on track now that your man Jim Green has left Holborn and waste reduction at city hall, zoning and land use and the call for more openess and inclusion of residents in the decision making at city hall and cutting the millions you spend on consultants and dealing with the olympic debt and losses due to the price reductions of between 30 and 40%.
And as the ruling party now we can expect specifics not generalizations.
I ask the same of the NPA as well.
0
1
Rating: -1
Actually James
I think that 9,000 of the 10,000 sq feet of space are going to be in a 19 story tower on Broadway and Kingsway, and that they won't be affordable. Not only will the tower not be used by artists (who usually have little money), but it will aid in the gentrification and displacement that's taking place in Mount Pleasant. Already businesses are considering closing (or have closed, see empty store fronts on Main Street).

That's okay though, because 26.6% of the City is living below the low-income cut-off line, and probably won't be around in the City much longer.
0
1
Rating: -1
East Van Arts
Much too little. Far too late.

Vision voted "no" to the Pantages Theatre restoration. 2000 people saw that dazzling theatre, and know that Vision failed. Utterly failed.

Vision turned thumbs down on the Red Gate. Dozens of artists know what Vision did. In fact, Vision has done nothing in THREE YEARS to preserve space for artists.

And now this? What a joke.

Here's what the majority of our artists actually believe: http://wedontbackthejuiceman.tumblr.com/

Vision has trotted out this sort of promise before. Once upon a time they were believed. No longer.

Vision doesn't have a platform. They have a treadmill.
0
0
Rating: 0
Keith Higgins
What was missing from the artists' studios policy passed a few weeks ago was any measureable targets, so in that respect this is a good step. However, the 10,000 square feet is a timid target: if this was parcelled out in 250-square-foot units, you would get 40 of them. This is barely a scratch on the amount of creative space that has been lost in the past few years mainly due to development pressures, under city governments of both stripes.

There are also no details in this announcement about how the space will be provided, and under what terms. The two major mechanisms available to the City are management by the City real estate people, who demand "market rates" on City-owned property, which is likely to result in unaffordable space. The other is developer bonus amenity arrangements, which in the past have created poorly-designed spaces with many restrictions attached.

The hazard is that people will look uncritically at the number 10,000 and assume that the problem or creative space is somehow dealt with, or that artists are a privileged group getting special attention. Neither is true. In Vancouver affordability of housing is key, not just for artists but for many of the different kinds of people that make a city functional. If we can't afford to live here, studios are a moot point.
1
0
Rating: +1
Taxpayers R Us
I think the title of this article is misleading.

It should read:

"Vision Vancouver pledges to provide funds to developers for artistic space development, or otherwise as they see fit."
0
1
Rating: -1
James G
Anyone else notice that Vision's campaign seems to be against it's own record in office?
1
0
Rating: +1
reality check
I'm curious why artist's can't provide their own studio space? There's a million other things the city should be spending their money (whoops, I meant OUR money) on.
1
0
Rating: +1
Ray I
It is not the role of government to develop market housing. The last thing we need are more over-cost government developments. The City should set the zoning and let private developers take the risk not the taxpayers!
0
1
Rating: -1
we dont back the juiceman
1
0
Rating: +1
K Williams
Sounds like the start of a new developer giveaway deal that won't help artists but will dump more money into the pockets of Vision's backers. STIR was once supposed to be for renters not developers and we all know how that turned put.
1
1
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.