West End tower proposal returns to Vancouver City Hall during public hearing

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      A controversial West End tower proposal is back in city council chambers this week, as a public hearing takes place nearly two years after the project was put on hold.

      City staff say the revised rezoning and development permit application for 1401 Comox Street contains “significant changes” from the original proposal, including a reduced height from 216 feet to 200 feet, a repositioned building to reduce shadowing effects on surrounding areas, and a larger green space for public use.

      But some of the West End residents that spoke against the proposal during the first night of the public hearing Monday (June 11) evening argued the changes won't appease community concerns.

      City staff, who are recommending approval of the project, say the 22-storey, 186-unit rental building proposed for 1401 Comox Street would generate purpose-built rental apartments in a neighbourhood where such units have not been built for decades. The project was originally submitted in 2009 under the STIR (Short-Term Incentives for Rental) program.

      Developer Ian Gillespie of Westbank Projects Corp. said rental housing in the area “has to replenished”.

      “There really hasn’t been anything in the last 20, 30 years,” he told council during a presentation.

      Architect Gregory Henriquez described the market rental units as fitting “right in the middle of the housing continuum”.

      “They’re a meaningful addition to our housing stock,” he said.

      According to city staff, the purpose-built rental units are intended to provide “an affordable alternative to homeownership” and are targeted at moderate income households. Housing policy planner Dan Garrison said moderate income, as defined by the city’s task force on housing affordability, is considered as between $21,500 to $86,500.

      Some speakers questioned that target, and whether the proposed rents will be affordable for a range of West End residents.

      “It’s a bizarre amount you’ve come up with, because a person making $21,000 is on a completely different financial level than somebody making over $80,000,” said Terry Martin, who ran on the Neighbourhoods for Sustainable Vancouver slate during the November 2011 civic election.

      Christine Ackermann, the president of the West End Residents’ Association, said while the proposal will deliver the first rental project in the community in 40 to 50 years, she argued the project “doesn’t adequately address affordability”.

      Ackermann proposed that council lower the building costs of the site by reducing the parking and setting aside a portion of the suites to fit the median income of West End residents. She said the median income per household in the community is $38,500.

      “Nine hundred and fifty for a one-bedroom is what we could afford for the median income in our community,” she said. “If you just direct the developer to say we need some affordability in this building, you can do that – council can do that right now.”

      The units are expected to rent for between $860 to $1,209 for a studio suite, $1,128 to $1,465 for a one-bedroom apartment, $1,611 to $1,988 for a two-bedroom, and $2,320 to $2,541 for a three-bedroom townhouse.

      Randy Helten, who spoke on behalf of the West End Neighbours, requested that council send the proposal back to the applicant “to come back with something more acceptable for the community”.

      Helten criticized the “huge increase in density and height” proposed in the application, and the use of “spot rezonings” before the city’s community planning process for the West End has been completed.

      “The staff report reads more like a justification of the proposed development, rather than an objective analysis of the impacts and benefits of the proposal,” he argued.

      Council also heard from speakers that were in support of the rezoning application, including Dean Malone, a resident of the West End for the last 15 years and a former co-chair of the West End Mayor’s Advisory Committee.

      “With 80 percent of our community as renters, we have continued to live in housing stock built through the 60’s and 70’s, with few new options through the 80’s and onwards,” he said.

      “One hundred and eight-six apartments at 1401 Comox will be filled with people who live and shop in the West End, with many of them working in our own community.”

      The rezoning application from Henriquez Partners Architects, on behalf of Westbank Projects and the Peterson Investment Group, is to increase the density at 1401 Comox Street from 1.50 to 7.19 floor-space ratio (FSR). The 17,292 square feet site, which was until recently occupied by the St. John’s United Church, is located at the northwest corner of Comox and Broughton Streets.

      The application includes a landscaped public open space along Comox Street, with a children’s play area, a community garden, and an open lawn with seating. Six units in the building will be allotted to seniors for a minimum of five years under the Shelter Aid for Elderly Renters Program.

      A development cost levy of approximately $1.4 million has been waived given that the development application was submitted before the end of the STIR program, according to city staff. The application was put on hold in August 2010 to allow further consultation with the West End community.

      Over 65 speakers had signed up to speak at the public hearing as of Monday night. The hearing is scheduled to resume on Wednesday (June 13) evening at 6 p.m.

      Comments

      16 Comments

      Liz Carney

      Jun 12, 2012 at 12:29pm

      Too bad the dates are incorrect, The hearing continues at City Hall Wed June 13 after being held over from Mon June 11. Hope this can be corrected before the print version of the paper hits the streets.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Urban_Citizen

      Jun 12, 2012 at 12:34pm

      The developer and his architect are proposing a 385% density bonus on this site to create market rental units. The developer, the City, and some of the commenters should be honest that other rental units created in the last 10 years in the West End include the 200 units on Nelson Street west of Burrard and the 234 units currently being rented on Robson at Jervis. The developer should be proposing a more modest increase in density OR should await the results of the currently ongoing West End Community Plan process. With regard to rents, as a point of reference on "proposed rents" - the "proposed rents" for the STIR project at 1142 Granville Street were to be "on average $960 per month." The actual rents in the building "start at" $1195 per month. So much for "affordable rentals" from the STIR program. The developer might also want to be honest about the 96 existing rental units they are operating as hotel units (in contravention of municipal regulations) at 1128 Alberni Street.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Jiff

      Jun 12, 2012 at 12:46pm

      Architect Gregory Henriquez described the market rental units as fitting “right in the middle of the housing continuum”.

      Continuum? Go f*ck yourself.

      0 0Rating: 0

      jonny .

      Jun 12, 2012 at 1:15pm

      Their proposal doesnt have NEARLY enough parking spots. I dont remember the number, but its not even close to 1 per unit - I think it was even less than one parking spot for every 2 units. They do this so that they can charge super high parking fees. If they are told they need to keep rents within a certain range, they make up for it my charging excessive amounts for parking.

      Also, what is the square footage of those 1 bedrooms? A typical 1 bedroom in that area is 600 square feet. I bet the new tower is proposing 400 square foot apartments.

      We do need more apartments in the West End, but we need them of an appropriate size (not horrible closets like they are building for condos), and the West End badly needs more parking. This building will cause more problems.

      0 0Rating: 0

      M.MacNeill

      Jun 12, 2012 at 6:12pm

      If we need rental then why is a building on Barclay being sold off as condos? No one mentions the two hotels that are being converted to rental, one on Robson, one on Denman.
      st. The city never mentions all the condo units that are being rented as short term accommodation or the buildings that are rented as hotels that should be rental. The project isn't going to solve the affordability issues but rather set rental rates higher.

      0 0Rating: 0

      West End Villager

      Jun 12, 2012 at 7:47pm

      "Six units in the building will be allotted to seniors for a minimum of five years under the Shelter Aid for Elderly Renters Program." So what are these elderly renters expected to do after the 5 years? Die?

      0 0Rating: 0

      Perdido

      Jun 12, 2012 at 9:10pm

      How can our pro-development Vision Vancouver betters make a fair and impartial decision on the matter of Westbank’s development plans if Vision is accepting campaign donations from the developers that they are supposed to regulate?

      0 0Rating: 0

      Taxpayers R Us

      Jun 12, 2012 at 10:14pm

      Visionless Vancouver, as usual, is blowing public taxpayer money to support developers, and the more this goes on, the more momentum a call for civic and criminal review of the party's behaviour will gather.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Save Vancouver

      Jun 12, 2012 at 11:34pm

      Save your time and boycott Vision Vancouver's kangaroo court public hearings. You only add a veil of legitimacy to their sellout to developers.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Frank

      Jun 13, 2012 at 2:12am

      On the one hand people complain about high accommodation prices, on the other hand they complain about not wanting more buildings.

      If developers can't develop then prices won't go down. If you want legislated cheap accommodation then you'll end up with crappy accommodation. Price fixing does not work.

      0 0Rating: 0