What’s in your H1N1 flu vaccine?
Chris Shaw wasn’t always skeptical about vaccines. The neuroscientist at the University of British Columbia had his teenage son vaccinated with most of the recommended shots. But then he started studying some of the ingredients commonly found in vaccines.
What he discovered caused him to go cold turkey on all shots for his six-year-old daughter. And that includes the vaccine for the H1N1 flu.
“I am not convinced H1N1 is sufficiently hazardous to most people to risk the potential downside of the vaccine,” Shaw said over the phone from his office in the research pavilion at the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority.
Shaw isn’t an easily dismissed vaccine conspiracy theorist. He is a leading expert on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, or Lou Gehrig’s disease) and Parkinson’s disease. While investigating unusually high rates of ALS and other neurological disorders among veterans who have Gulf War syndrome, he found evidence that the cause may have been aluminum salt, an ingredient in the cocktail of vaccines given to soldiers before deployment.
Although aluminum salt isn’t present in the H1N1 vaccine, Shaw’s discovery made him concerned about other vaccines, including the swine-flu shot. He isn’t alone in his thoughts.
Despite a full frontal assault of news about the dangers of the flu and the importance of vaccination, a survey in late October revealed that only 36 percent of Canadians said they would get the shot. Lack of trust in the vaccine was cited as the main reason for vaccine opposition. Another poll in November found that 65 percent of Canadians believe the media has overreacted to the threat of swine flu.
Even many health workers aren’t convinced. In two separate surveys, in the U.K. (Pulse) and Hong Kong (British Medical Journal), published in August, half of health-care professionals said they didn’t intend to get the vaccine.
Canadian health officials and some newspaper columnists have reacted by accusing vaccine opponents of being conspiracy mongers or just plain irresponsible.
Who is right? Is the cure really worse than the disease? Let’s look at some numbers.
First, the disease. Swine flu had killed 161 Canadians as of November 12. That works out to one death per 200,000 Canadians in the past six-and-a-half months. Over the same period of time, major cardiovascular diseases typically claim 240 times more Canadian lives (about 39,000), cancer claims 230 times more (37,000 deaths), pneumonia kills 18 times more (2,800), and accidental falls claim eight times more (1,260), according to calculations based on 2005 Statistics Canada figures.
H1N1 has about the same death rate as hernias. But we don’t see scary front-page headlines for months on end about hernias, pneumonia, or falling down.
“It’s really not causing—and is not going to cause and nowhere has caused—significant levels of illness or death,” Dr. Richard Schabas, Ontario’s former chief medical officer of health, told the CBC on November 12.
Schabas said H1N1 “has ultimately turned out to be, from a pandemic perspective, a dud”.
What about the vaccine? Is it safe? Despite the onslaught of confident pronouncements from health officials and doctors, Shaw says he hasn’t seen enough information on the safety of the vaccine. “If the science were there, we could make a rational decision. But it’s a coin toss.”
Looking for answers, Shaw turned to the 24-page product-information leaflet on the vaccine released by drug giant GlaxoSmithKline. Health Canada used this document in approving the shot.
The leaflet leaves Shaw cold. “You couldn’t turn this in as a master’s thesis anywhere I know of and get a passing grade,” he said, calling the leaflet a “shocking document”.
Shaw said the material lacks basic information. For example, there is no safety data at all for several groups of people—pregnant women, people aged over 60, kids aged 10 to 17, and children under three. For kids three to nine years old, there is only “very limited” data.






even tho' I'm well over 65 yrs
I sure won't get it now, had me druthers anyway and
didn't intend to get the vaccine.
Rod Smelser
My teen aged son and I are in "high risk" categories and I was worried that my choice in not getting the shots was a bad one. We both work in client services and so far we are in better health than the people around us who had the shot and are suffering from "colds." I attribute this to our history in making significant choices in our diets and obsessive hand washing.
When will we stand up and demand our governments to clamp down on drug companies? I shudder when I think about where this virus began.
And don't even get me started about the irresponsibility of mainstream media and the hype that both the drug companies and the government relied upon to grease this frenzied wheel for them. I only hope their fervor will be as strong when they report on the suffering this vaccine could create.
Image if we had that media hype to help underdeveloped nations get access to the much needed drugs(tested) that is so needed? Good on the GS for printing this story!
There were as many new deaths just this past week as there were total deaths in the first six months of surveillance.
And the number of new deaths has roughly doubled every week for the past month - if this keeps up, there will be more than 11,000 dead from H1N1 by the end of December.
Is that going to happen? Probably not. (I certainly hope not!) If this flu follows normal flu trends it will peak sometime in the next week or so, stabilize for a few weeks, and then start to decline leaving us with possibly as few as 600 dead (1 in 55,000 or so) by the end of the year. Still a small number, certainly, but several times higher than the 161 Mr. Roslin seems to be implying is a typical 6-month death toll for this strain.
And since H1N1 is already bucking a lot of the normal flu trends (active earlier in the year, killing young, healthy people, etc.), it's a little soon to start forecasting how it's all going to play out.
On our site, www.canadiansforhealthfreedom.org, we have a page where Canadian vaccine victims can report what has happened to them, and other Canadians can decide for themselves what risks, and what benefits, accrue with the H1N1 vaccine.
Thank you for allowing us herd people the opportunity to think for ourselves!
Re. grossly inflated stats, google the article by CBS News - Oct. 21st 'Swine Flu Overestimated' ... a real eye-opener that official state lab results prior to when lab testing was stopped showed only a tiny % of suspected H1N1 cases actually tested positive... Even allowing let's say for a huge jump in rates since then, the stats don't come remotely close to what's being reported. Bear in mind, that many cases - even deaths - labelled as being caused by H1N1 have NOT actually been verified by lab tests. Epidemiologist, Dr. Tom Jefferson of the respected Cochrane independent scientific review has blasted shoddy flu stat reporting and notes that there are over 200 viruses than can cause flu-LIKE symptoms, and while these may not all be equally circulating, the CBS graph (lower in the article) makes it disturbingly clear that a lot of what is labelled H1N1 or even the seasonal flu, do not actually check out for such when put to the test.
The best reason not to take this poison may be this: Where's the pandemic? This non-event is turning out to be reminiscent of the anthrax scare that followed 911. The difference today is that an administrative system is been erected to apply doses on a mass scale.
I've never taken a flu shot in my life, nor have my kids--nor are we planning to, no matter how much the CDC and WHO ramp up the fear level.
It's all about profits. Period.
http://ukraineplague.blogspot.com
"Is this the same Dr Chris Shaw who's an Olympics critic?"
What the flip would Dr. Shaw's opposition to the olympics have to do with his knowledge about this topic?
Pages