Each time we were asked, we said we would not consider it for two
primary reasons. First, it would eliminate B.C.'s ability to set our own
tax rate. Second, we wanted to be able to shape our tax regime with
flexibility that would allow us to exempt certain goods and services
from being taxable. It wasn't until last year that kind of flexibility
was available.
After the election, the Minister of Finance and I were informed that the
Province's financial situation had deteriorated significantly. I asked
officials to find a way to meet our budget targets without cutting core
services. By late May 2009, it was becoming clear that after months of
discussion Ontario had negotiated new flexibility within the HST model.
Through further discussions with the federal government, we learned of
additional flexibility that would allow provinces to set their own tax
rate, instead of adopting a national rate of 13 per cent. This allowed
us to set our own rate at 12 per cent, the lowest in the country. We
were also offered new flexibility that would allow us to exempt products
we felt would be important to families - children-sized clothing and
footwear, books, motor fuel, diapers, car seats and a range of other
products. In addition, the federal government offered $1.6 billion in
transition funding. That meant we could reduce the future debt we would
pass on to our children and support increased funding to both health
care and education.
With those new conditions in place, we asked ourselves if the HST would
strengthen the Province's economy as we move through the global economic
downturn. Would the HST allow our industries and small businesses to
better compete internationally and within Canada? Would it create jobs?
Would it give business the ability to pay higher wages and lower prices?
Study after study confirmed the HST would do all those things. World-renowned economist Jack Mintz from the University of Calgary found that
moving to an HST will create more than 110,000 jobs, attract over $11
billion in new investment, increase wages and lower prices.
Those working in small business, forestry, mining, energy, agriculture,
retail, transportation and construction will realize immediate and
direct benefits. For the rest of us, the stronger economy will mean more
job opportunities, stronger communities and more revenues to support
critical public services. The HST, combined with our other tax
reductions, will soon make British Columbia one of the most attractive
places to invest and do business anywhere in the world.
I know many people feel like they are paying more and getting less.
That's why over the last nine years our government has acted to leave
more of people's hard-earned wages in their pockets. We've cut income
taxes by at least 37 per cent for individuals since 2001, and British
Columbians now pay the lowest personal income taxes in the country if
you earn less than $118,000. The after-tax size of an average British
Columbian's paycheque today is considerably higher than it was in 2001.
An individual earning $50,000 a year pays $2,012 less in provincial
income taxes today. That's more than $2,000 for individuals to save or
spend as they choose. Cutting taxes has helped our economy stay strong
enough that we've been able to make record investments into health care
and education.
The HST has not been good short-term politics. But in the end, everyone
has to decide whether they are going to do what is right or what is
easy. I believe the HST is the right thing for our Province's economy
and for our children's future. Change today will make us stronger
tomorrow.
Gordon Campbell is the premier of British Columbia and the leader of the B.C. Liberal Party.
Comments
Then what happened to our core services? Why were arts and education dealt such a blow?
I - don't - believe - you. What's more important, British Columbians do not believe you or in you.
During Election 09 you were still the premier and Colin Hansen was still Minister of Finance, election campaign or not. If as you claim a sudden and significant deterioration in the Province's finances had materialized out of thin air, with no warning whatsoever, such a material development would have been communicated to you.
Before the election in FY2008 and FY2009 federal revenues had been falling off a cliff at a rate not seen in more than a decade. Those were not normal times. The unprecedented fall in government revenue led to almost 60 billion in new federal debt in FY2008 and that number was already growing in the first two months of FY2009. Equity markets had plummeted, borrowing had become all but impossible, and of specific concern to B.C., resource prices across the board had sunk like a blown up oil rig to the bottom of the sea. Provincial revenue had to have been following along the very same path as federal revenue and you had to have known all of this heading into election 2009.
Despite every opportunity to raise the obvious issue, your campaign did not. Talk about fudge-it budgets, your campaign managed to avoid the giant elephant in the room and studiously avoided talking about how you would address revenue shortfalls.
The people of British Columbia do not appreciate being told such outrageous lies and your government must fall for that reason alone, regardless of the potential merits of the HST.
RECALL IN THE FALL!!!!!!
You're supposed to REPRESENT the citizens of BC, not impose what you think is best for us.
You're a public servant. Do you understand the concept of that term? It's not a synonym for authority or dictator. It means your job is to do what we say.
"...the federal government offered $1.6 billion in transition funding. That meant we could reduce the future debt we would pass on to our children and support increased funding to both health care and education. "
Indeed we could... Yet you're cutting education, spending over $1 BILLION on new prisons, and racking up massive amounts of debt while canoodling with the IMF boys at your first Bilderberg meeting. You're building a huge new casino while cutting the gaming money that used to go to the Arts and charities.
We're going to recall your lemming party members now, and when the NDP (Nanny-state Dependence Party) win the next election, if they screw around like they always do and fail to repeal the HST immediately we'll just recall them as well. Enough is enough, no one believes you or Carole James anymore. Stepping down and having Falcon run for Premier won't work either.
Despite my criticisms and sarcasm, I'd like to honestly thank you and your HST flip-flop for being the catalyst that got BC citizens interested in Provincial politics again.
ps: You and Colin should check out Kumon Learning, because apparently you both have trouble with math.
http://www.kumon.com/
The only reason for this tax, imposed in the most deceitful manner is to help pay for useless programs, bloated ministries and disgustingly overpaid bureaucrats.
You forgot to add that instead of using it for health care and education, you immediately spent the entire amount on big business welfare: $.6 billion for a retractable roof and $1 billion in new oil and gas industry subsidies.
Gordon....dont you get it? No one believes this! The vast majority feels you are a lier. Why do you feel you are the only smart guy in the room? Do you not think that 700,000 people who disagree with you are maybe right and you are wrong?
You have already become the most hated politician in BCs history, and the liberal government will topple. Why? In the end the voters have the power.
Liberals knew the HST was coming but knew if they mentioned it before the election they would have lost. Now you expect us to buy this garbage when we know you LIED. You mismanaged the province and the HST was your only escape. When the recall happens in the fall and the Liberal party starts to crumble please dont resign like a COWARD but stay and face the music. The HST will be gone in BC whether its by recall or the next election but at the end it will be done. The Liberal party will be destroyed and you have nobody to blame but yourself.
http://festiverants.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/b-c-business-community-come...
A: Not necessarily."
YES YES YES. Consumption taxes are *always* better than income taxes. Few (if any) serious economist argues otherwise. "Spin-free", I see.