Paul Houle: COPE renews commitment to grassroots at fall general meeting

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      There is a new tone at COPE meetings. After the serious losses that the 44-year-old organization suffered in the last municipal election, there is a mood of wanting to put aside past differences and work to salvage a great, but battered, political organization.

      This was apparent at Sunday’s (September 9) autumn COPE general meeting. I was excited to see COPE returning to what it does best—reaching out and really listening to grassroots communities and the people of the neighbourhoods of Vancouver.

      To begin with, much of the practical organizing of the meeting was done by COPE’s smart, dynamic (and workaholic) young new executive director Sean Antrim. But equally, if not more importantly, the COPE executive board has worked together to stage a series of general meetings where serious policy issues are considered. But, not only that, the idea is to genuinely use the resolutions and ideas generated at these gatherings to form election policy platforms and make changes to the COPE constitution and bylaws.

      The meeting itself was held in the Killarney neighbourhood. The general focus was on seniors’ concerns. However, it also brought in very important voices from the Indo-Canadian and aboriginal communities. As well, an array of reports were presented from established or new COPE subcommittees. Included in these was a newly minted arts, culture, and heritage committee, which I chair.

      Charan Gill, a long-time champion of human rights—especially the rights of Indo-Canadian farmworkers—presented inspiring words about his current work to provide care for Indo-Canadian and other seniors.

      Gill is the founding president of the Progressive Intercultural Community Services Society. Gill noted his group’s recent advocacy for seniors’ care for members of the gay, lesbian, and transgender communities.

      Housing advocate Gail Harmer highlighted a real problem in the Killarney neighbourhood of seniors not being able to get rent receipts from landlords. Without these receipts, seniors are not able to claim rent subsidies from SAFER (Shelter Aid for Elderly Renters). Harmer described landlords not issuing receipts as simply “tax avoidance”.

      Musqueam Band member Rhiannon Bennett outlined in moving terms the efforts of her community to protect ancestral burial grounds at the social-called “Marpole Midden” (1338 Southwest Marine Drive). The land is now under development for market housing.

      Bennett noted that the bones of small infants have been excavated from the burial grounds: children who may have died in one of the devastating smallpox epidemics that hit the aboriginal population.

      Bennett said that Canadian laws do not recognize aboriginal burial sites as “graveyards”. Rather, they are seen as “archeological sites” from which human remains can be removed as long as they are not destroyed. The bones are apparently being stored in a trailer at the construction site.

      Sunday’s meeting included a number of “breakaway” policy discussion circles. The guest speakers, as well as these groups, generated a range of policy recommendations: most of them focused on ways of creating more affordable housing as well as protecting aboriginal rights. COPE member Connie Hubbs outlined the resolution of one group that a “housing authority” be created with a mandate to protect existing affordable housing stock as well as create new housing.

      So, it was a breath of fresh air to attend a COPE meeting where we could focus on what COPE’s policies should be in regard to important Vancouver issues, instead of the endless debate about how COPE should frame itself in relation to Vision Vancouver.

      I hope that COPE does not go down the dead end of another subservient marriage with Vision. COPE is the organization that is best positioned to represent the concerns of the average citizens of Vancouver, no matter which cultural community, minority, or neighbourhood. Sunday’s fall general meeting was strong evidence of that.

      Vision has clearly shown itself constrained in its ability to represent average people with its dependence on big bucks from the development community. Likewise for the NPA as the “junior” developer party. Vision and the NPA may continue to represent mostly the “one percent”. COPE must represent the “99 percent”.

      I heartily look forward to more policy conferences as COPE demonstrates it is best at formulating the most relevant and meaningful social and economic policies for average Vancouverites.

      Paul Houle is currently the chair of the Coalition of Progressive Electors’ arts, culture, and heritage committee and previously served seven terms on the COPE executive board.

      Comments

      8 Comments

      2nd Nation

      Sep 10, 2012 at 12:27pm

      does COPE have a hope of winning any seat in the future? the answer is "nope".

      Connie Hubbs

      Sep 10, 2012 at 12:46pm

      I was impressed at the strong turnout yesterday. Every chair was full. There was a great feeling in the room too. If this is a good sample of our engaged, progressive citizens, it speaks well for Vancouver in the months to come.

      COPE supporter

      Sep 10, 2012 at 12:54pm

      It's great to see that COPE is remaining connected to the grassroots that have sustained it for 44 years. If this trend continues it'll be strong for another 44 years.

      Diamond Dan

      Sep 10, 2012 at 1:27pm

      @2nd Nation

      Then we're all doomed!

      City Observer

      Sep 10, 2012 at 2:17pm

      Indeed, the COPE meeting at the Killarney Community Centre on Sunday was heartening, at all times an involving and provocative community engagement forum that, during its almost 3-hour running time, explored housing, seniors, transit, First Nations, parks, and human rights issues that oughta be the concern of every one of us. COPE is alive as a progressive municipal party, an alternative to the developer-funded parties (Vision/NPA), representing the interests of families in <i>every</i> neighbourhood.

      Andrew

      Sep 10, 2012 at 3:45pm

      Is it time to finalize the divorce from Vision? Let's hope so. In a council where 10 out of 11 seats are controlled by developers we have a long way to go. COPE needs to have a strong, critical and independent voice representing community interests first.

      PendrellSt

      Sep 11, 2012 at 1:54am

      It is become well apparent that Vision Vancouver are not the progressive party they pretend to be. They openly flout the democractic process, show utter disregard for the community (who are these f*cking hacks?) and have a disturbing relationship with the development community. Vision bulldozes neighbourhoods, they don't create them. I believe they stay up in the polls simply because there is no credible alternative (certainly not the NPA).

      Time for COPE to seize the day. Time for a divorce.

      @Diamond Dan

      Sep 11, 2012 at 6:42am

      No, I won't be doomed, I'll be OK as will most of us. It's more you I'm worried about. If your doom or success depends in the municipal party in power I suggest you might want to make some different choices in the future to improve your situation. Good luck.