Pads to save or trash Africa
Environmental blogger Deanna Duke, while channel-surfing five weeks ago, happened upon a commercial for Always pads. It showed a sad-looking African girl who couldn’t go to school during her period because she didn’t have “feminine protection”. Thanks to a new $1.4-million campaign by Procter & Gamble, the ad explained, her village was receiving disposable pads so she and other girls could go to school.
“There was something that didn’t sit right with me,” Duke told the Straight in a phone interview from Seattle on March 11. “It struck me, what was the environmental impact of doing this? What do they do with all these things?”¦And what happens in five years [after the girls graduate]?”
Sustainability in pads and tampons is a question Duke struggles with locally. Last year, she ran a “Diva Cup Challenge” on her blog, encouraging her North American readers—and herself—to switch from disposable tampons to an environmental alternative. In parts of Africa, she’s found since seeing the ad, the problem is compounded. Open landfills create health hazards, and plastics incineration leads to toxic air. Plus, she pointed out, P & G benefits from the campaign because it makes the company look benevolent to North American consumers while it’s developing markets for disposables in Africa.
Duke asked her readers if anyone would be interested in sewing reusable pads to send to African girls as an alternative to P & G’s campaign. That’s how her new charity, goods4girls.org, came about. It’s working with Vancouver-based Lunapads, a five-woman collective that makes reusable pads and has been donating kits to African girls for more than five years.
“I’m hoping people will know the real deal when they see it,” Lunapads cofounder Madeline Shaw told the Straight. “I think we should give P & G their due. They’ve brought the issue to a mainstream consciousness.”¦But it’s not a sustainable solution.”
On the phone from P & G headquarters in Cincinnati, Protecting Futures program director Michelle Vaeth said it is sustainable; in fact, she said, it’s necessary in places where there isn’t adequate water for washing reusable pads. She also noted that P & G is lobbying African governments to drop the “luxury” taxes on pads and tampons so they’ll be more affordable. She added that the pads are part of a larger campaign, which includes building washrooms and incineration facilities at schools, and setting up dormitories.
P & G’s Protecting Futures is one of several Africa-focused corporate “philanthropy” campaigns that have cropped up over the past few years. Product Red, which donates a portion of profits from the sale of branded products to the purchase of antiretroviral drugs for Africans, includes the Gap, Converse, Dell, Motorola, Hallmark, and others. Last month, the Swedish clothing retailer H&M launched Fashion Against AIDS in its 1,300 stores. The idea is that North American consumer choices will lead to improved conditions in the developing world. A common criticism is that relatively little money is donated while the companies reap a cornucopia of profits and good publicity.
With $76 billion in global sales, P & G’s 2007 net earnings were $10.3 billion, according to its financial statements listed on PG.com. That’s double what it made in 2003. Given that P & G makes Pampers, Iams, Duracell, Pantene, Febreeze, and other common household brands, the mega-revenues are not surprising.
But developing countries have other alternatives to P & G aid. The Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee set up a sanitary napkin production centre staffed by adolescent girls, according to Menstrual Hygiene and Management in Developing Countries: Taking Stock, a 2004 report by Mumbai-based social-development consultants Sowmyaa Bharaswaj and Archana Patkar. The authors, who found many similar projects in the developing world, hope the report leads to sanitation practices that respond to women’s needs, in environmentally-sustainable ways.






i agree with Shenaya that African women should have all the options in the world. if they don't have ample clean water available, then disposables are the best things for their health. if they do, i'm sure they'll quickly discover on their own that re-usable pads and menstrual cups are both cheaper and more hygienic than disposables. but it is very ethnocentric of Westerners to push the burden of environmental protection on people who don't even have running water. for God's sake, give the women a faucet, THEN preach to them about conserving water and minimizing landfill waste.
i, by the way, am a Diva Cup user. have been for years. i still monthly bless the woman who first told me about it. it changed my life. i don't dread my period anymore. i haven't leaked once since i started using it. i wear white pants when i have my period--without underwear. i am a converted fundamentalist Diva Disciple. to all women with running water, who don't mind sticking their fingers inside themselves, i highly recommend them!
Disposable sanitary products in less economically developed countries aren't under as strict manufacturing as in other countries (granted, in the US and UK companies are self-tested and self-regulated, but government bodies still have some say). As scare-tactic as it sounds in the past we know that such products sold in LEDC's contain higher levels of bacteria, as well as containing fungi, and even foreign objects - is this still an issue? Is chrlorine gas bleaching or overly absorbent materials that are not allowed in the US and UK used in products available to these girls?
If areas like these require foreigners to step-in by providing them sanitary products, then what happens when these products cause TSS, vaginal infections, and UTI's (all of which linked to or commonly caused by disposable options)? Sanitary products allow some freedom for some, but then who is there to explain to them how to use such products correctly to protect their health and hyginene? - god knows most western girls seem ignorant about health risks and precautions to take, even with all the information available to them. Do these girls have access to the same information, or only the information P&G are giving them?
Are P&G also supplying clean water and health care? - Nope? That to me does suggest going for publicity and fishing for potential future new customers, certainly in the Western world their sole concern is money (time and time again showing no care for women's health, environment or tackling menstrual taboo's/body issues), I doubt when P&G set foot in Africa like this that they suddenly develop morals and ethics.
The original patent was in 1937 - http://www.mum.org/CupPat1.htm
>> and profit are mutually exclusive?
Holy economics 101, Batman!
Because a corporation is created for the purpose of generating profits for its shareholders. No other mission exists, and a company officer who tried to start a charity campaign that did not result in net profits would be acting unethically - and would be immediately fired. This isn't some sort of conspiracy theory, it's corporate law.
>> "Let's deal with a problem at a time" ???
Okay, and then let's just wait some more years to start thinking of what we are going to do to rescue not only the women but all the African people from drowning in the garbage we kind of made them produce. Yeah, that's sounds reeeally clever!
I love my Diva Cup and I love even more the idea of producing less garbage! I also love the idea of reusable pads. Why just trash our planet when we can go GREEN?!
someonewhocares: That's it, it's just corporate law! If you can't see that underneath this charity cover, then you're exactly the companies' target consumer.
Personally, I love my Diva Cup. I believe that this is the best solution for these countries. They must have potable water or else what are they drinking? The campaign should be for hygenic standards using the Diva cup (not sharing, cleaning it properly with potable water, etc.), and to also use cloth, but these need not be special manufactured pads from the West. Just the normal things that I'm sure they've been using for a millennia until the TV ads started to tell them to use something else.
One thing to note is that trash comes from earth not mars.