Lawyer urges Vancouver Falun Gong protesters to appeal injunction

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The lawyer representing a group of Falun Gong practitioners has said he will recommend that they appeal today’s B.C. Supreme Court ruling granting an injunction that requires them to remove a hut and billboards stationed outside the Chinese Consulate in Vancouver.

      Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein issued a 37-page ruling today (January 29) upholding the City of Vancouver’s application seeking the take down of the structures erected by the protesters.

      “First of all, they are not coming down without a further fight that’s for sure,” lawyer Joseph Arvay said today, after the judgment came down. “I haven’t got instructions and I’ve only just been given the reasons [for judgment] and I haven’t even been able to reach my client, but I can tell you unequivocally, that I am recommending an appeal because, with all due respect to the court, I don’t think the decision is correct.”

      The Falun Gong practitioners’ 24-7 vigil outside the consulate dates back to August 2001, during former Vancouver mayor Philip Owen’s reign, and was initially a 300-hour relay sit-in hunger strike, according to the court decision. It evolved into the around-the-clock protest vigil that survived the mayoral eras of Larry Campbell and Sam Sullivan.

      The ruling notes that Sullivan wanted the structures removed in 2006 “as part of his public order agenda”.

      “The evidence of the now former Mayor, which I accept, is that his wish to do so had nothing to do with the fact that the structures were in front of the Chinese Consulate or because of the sensitivities of the Chinese government,” Stromberg-Stein states in the judgment. “Rather, it was a public order issue concerning the integrity of the City’s by-laws.”

      The judge gave the protesters one week to remove the structures.

      Arvay reiterated that he is still waiting to speak to his clients, and receive further instructions.

      “I will be recommending an appeal,” he said. “I’ll be recommending that the decision of the judge be stayed pending the appeal, and I’ll be asking the city solicitor to ask the new mayor [Gregor Robertson] whether he really is going to pursue the policies of the previous administration, and whether in fact he will allow the vigil to remain, whether or not there is an appeal. We are certainly not accepting this decision as the last word.”

      Comments

      2 Comments

      montyvan

      Feb 1, 2009 at 4:41pm

      GET RID OF IT! It's been an eye-sore that every Vancouverite hates. What gives them the right to keep breaking the law like this? Can I go and erect a huge billboard on a public sidewalk advertising my cult, too? Who gave them special rights to do so? Most Chinese people do not relate to this cult, so, what's the big deal??

      TEAR THEM DOWN FOR GOOD! THEY ARE HIDEOUS!!

      Bruce Edwards

      Feb 1, 2009 at 8:41pm

      Falun Dafa's inoffensive seven-year 24/7 vigil outside the Chinese Consulate, bearing witness to the unspeakable cruelty of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party), is one of Vancouver's most noble features. Mayor Gregor Robertson and Council shame themselves by not stopping this vexatious court action.
      As one who has joined the vigil in solidarity against CCP bullying, I know that the signs & cubicle do not “encroach upon the sidewalk” and obstruct neither pedestrians nor vehicles so Vancouver City Council's court action is simply anti-democracy and pro-genocide. The Court's heartless decision reminds me of Judge Oliver Wendell Holmes famously saying “This is a court of law, young man, not a court of justice.”

      Demands to end the vigil probably came from the CPP/Chinese Consulate...