More emergency shelter spaces needed for women, Vancouver council hears

City council signaled their support this week for increasing emergency shelter spaces for women in Vancouver.

During a discussion on a motion introduced by COPE councillor Ellen Woodsworth and amended by other councillors, city council voted to make it a “continued high priority” to expand the number of 24-hour women-only shelters and beds.

Council also directed staff to ensure optional women-only areas in Vancouver’s co-ed shelters and to increase training for shelter employees.

Shawn Bayes, the executive director of the Elizabeth Fry Society of Greater Vancouver, told council Thursday (March 17) there are very few provincial standards to ensure women’s safety in co-ed shelters, such as separate sleeping areas or separate washrooms.

She added there are currently no standards for "training and gender responsiveness" at emergency shelters.

“I think we need to push further to actively encourage the development and consideration of those standards,” she told council.

Bayes said these kinds of standards have successfully been adopted in other jurisdictions such as Toronto.

Woodsworth’s motion follows concerns raised by a coalition of women’s groups last month about reports of sexual assaults in a Downtown Eastside women’s shelter.

According to Vancouver police, there have been six reported sexual assaults at the First United Church shelter since October 2010, three of which have resulted in charges.

Alice Kendall of the Downtown Eastside Women’s Centre told council that while there are some emergency shelters for women in the city, there aren’t enough spaces to meet the need.

“When we walk down the streets in the Downtown Eastside, we see many, many spaces for men, and we don’t see the equivalent for women, and it needs to be there,” said Kendall.

“Women are an invisible population in the community that are grossly under-serviced,” she added. “The consequence of being under-serviced is that women are in an even more vulnerable position.”

The Downtown Eastside Women’s Centre provides drop-in shelter space for women between 11 p.m. and 8 a.m.

The St. James Community Service Society operates two of the city’s emergency shelters for women, including a 52-bed temporary location on Powell Street, and a 33-bed facility in Mount Pleasant for women and children.

Jonathan Oldman, the executive director of the organization, said the emergency housing spaces are generally always full.

However, he said it’s difficult to determine the size of the unmet demand for emergency shelter.

“Women’s homelessness is complicated by the fact that I think people recognize there are a lot of women who are not on the street,” he told the Straight. “If they’re homeless, they end up staying in unsafe relationships or couch surfing. So I think a lot of women who are homeless don’t necessarily get recorded in the homeless count.”

Oldman said that while the number of turnaways at their facilities have decreased in the last two years, they are still turning away on average 8 to 10 a day between their two shelters.

He noted that the turnaways are treated as a guide and may not reflect a precise picture of how many people are unable to access accommodation.

Woodsworth said she wants to see the city pursue standards for women-only shelter spaces, as well as expansion of shelter beds, with the province. She noted that the wording of her original motion called for council to make the creation of additional shelter spaces for women “its highest priority”.

“We’ve I think worked really hard to set up the shelters and to work with the province on the 14 sites, but it has not been a priority to get separated space for women in those shelters,” she told the Straight.

“I think we have to look at both getting funding to open more spaces, but also see if there’s some space within existing shelters where we could create safe space for women.”



Taxpayers R Us

Mar 19, 2011 at 1:19am

“When we walk down the streets in the Downtown Eastside, we see many, many spaces for men, and we don’t see the equivalent for women, and it needs to be there,” said Kendall.

What a crock. Does anyone see a Boys Only sign on any of the shelter's doors?

This is gross opportunism at its worst. The shelters need a method to protect the women and the vulnerable, not a divisive Girls Only policy that these twits are calling for.


Mar 19, 2011 at 10:59am

Fact: There is not a single "men only" shelter in the city of Vancouver.

Just keeping it real...

Taxpayers R Us

Mar 19, 2011 at 3:50pm

There isn't a"men only "shelter because men are better than that, and we're more sympathetic than these women's groups.


Mar 19, 2011 at 8:04pm

Could who ever disagreed with my comment please post a link showing a men only shelter?

I was only stating a fact, not an opinion, so if someone "disagreed" im sure you felt my fact was wrong. I personally have no opinion one way or another if more woman's shelters should be open. I just take issue to the inaccuracies used to support the argument.

Again, there is not a single men only shelter in the city.

Try and prove me wrong ;)


Mar 20, 2011 at 9:28am


Just what I thought...

In need of housing

Mar 20, 2011 at 11:48am

Back to the street for the women and girls the shelter is closed for the day. And when the shelters are closed or full watch your backs you are not safe.. Vancouver streets are no cake walk. Infact they are women who didn't live through the experience. Who cares about men shelters, the youth better watch their backs also. The whole point of the subject is women's safety not an exclusive club.


Mar 20, 2011 at 1:40pm

Congratulations taxpayer. Do you have any idea what your spouting off about? Perhaps its just your privilege that has given you so much education on the subject. Shame on you.

Cry babies

Mar 20, 2011 at 1:51pm

The way u guys are going on u would think the women were pushing u out of bed. But what is really being done is the creation of safer places for the women to sleep. If you guys end up having a bunch of fellows being raped in the shelters I would recommend u set them straight.


Mar 21, 2011 at 6:26pm

There are two large Salvation Army homeless shelters that are for men only. And in the coed shelters perhaps 80% of the inhabitants are men, many of whom are somewhat crazy, high, and / or aggressive. I don't think women are too safe at the United Church shelter on Hastings and perhaps the same is true for other co-ed shelters, so some more shelters for women only makes sense. Why not?

Taxpayers R Us

Mar 22, 2011 at 11:09pm

B.C. Housing provides nearly $5 million for 160 women-only shelter beds in the Downtown Eastside, of which about 100 are available 24-7.

That's in the DTES alone, not counting the rest of the city, let alone the neighbouring cities.

As for choosing between rape and no shelter, that' s BS, just like Kendall saying there are so many men-only spaces and not enough for women. All charges have been dropped on those assaults, btw.

I know honesty is a tall order for some of these feminist groups (they've shown that time and time again), but my biggest beef is their thinking that we just accept what they say as truth, when it's lie after lie following an agenda.