Why “ethnic” communities should not support Stephen Harper's Conservatives
A group of Canadian immigration lawyers, practitioners, and academics issued today (April 20) the following open letter:
Despite the media hype and government propaganda, Canadian immigration experts, both academics and lawyers, do not think that the Conservative government is doing immigrant communities any favours.
Stephen Harper, Jason Kenney and the Conservatives have targeted the so-called "ethnic vote," hoping to convince immigrant communities that the Conservatives have made things better for their communities and that these communities should support them. However, a review of the facts shows that this government's policies have not been friendly to immigrant communities. Moreover, the Conservative government has made a habit of using immigration issues to stir up anti- immigrant sentiments amongst other Canadians.
1. Since the Conservative Party took power, the processing time of visa applications for parents and grandparents has increased dramatically. Jason Kenney tries to manipulate the statistics to suggest that the contrary is true but the facts speak for themselves. The number of parent and grandparent visas issued in 2006, based on the 2005 targets, was 20,005. The number of visas for parents and grandparents that will be issued this year is 11,200, a reduction of almost 9,000 or close to 44 per cent. The total processing time of a sponsorship of a parent application including the time for the processing of the sponsorship in Canada and the processing of the application overseas has increased between nine and thirty months depending on the visa post. Moreover, given that the number of visas issued is being reduced, the backlogs will increase and the processing times will increase. The failure of the government to address this issue is creating immense hardship on immigrant families.
2. The Conservative Government has cut settlement funding for immigrants and has refused to fund many well established groups. Moreover, as is well known, the government decides funding applications based on political considerations, providing funding to those groups that support them and denying funding to those that do not. In December, the Harper government cut $53 million from the 2011-12 budget for programs that offer support and integration services for new Canadians. This was not a rebalancing between provinces, this was a 10% cut to the overall budget before any reallocation occurred. In addition to a $43 million cut in Ontario, British Columbia was slashed by 8% or $8.5 million and Nova Scotia has been cut as well. The Conservatives have also held back more than $200 million of promised settlement funding for Ontario during the last 5 years - before the cuts were made.
3. Despite claims that the Conservative government cut the backlog of skilled workers, the backlog that was 487,000 in 2005 and is now 508,000. The overall backlog has grown by 173,000 on the Conservative’s watch. Thus despite all their claims to being good managers, they have failed to make any significant improvements in the skilled worker program in content or efficiency.
4. The Conservative Government promises it will get tough on human smugglers. However, instead of punishing the smugglers the bill targets the victims of smuggling, the refugees. The bill will require mandatory detention of all persons who arrive by boat for one year—including women and children. They would also deny permanent residence – and family reunification -- to recognized refugees for five years for no reason other than their mode of arrival. The Conservatives have made their claim that they are getting tough on human smugglers a cornerstone of their re-election strategy. However, the policy has nothing to do with smugglers and has everything to do with demonizing and reducing the numbers of refugees. After all the government has also proposed to eliminate the category of refugees who can be considered for refugee status by applying from their home countries.
5. The Conservative government proposes to make it harder for spouses to reunite by introducing conditional visas for a period of two years from landing.. Jason Kenney claims that the government is targeting ”˜marriage fraud’ but don’t be fooled – every couple will face additional, harsher, longer and more invasive scrutiny. The more cynical visa officers have had their cynicism encouraged by Mr. Kenney. Just because you know your marriage is genuine, doesn’t mean the government will agree, and even more individuals, families and communities will suffer as a result of the government’s culture of suspicion. If a visa officer does deny a family sponsorship application, there will be a delay of several years before an appeal can be decided, further delaying family reunification. And those marriages entered into in good faith that fail within the two years conditional period will be suspect, causing many spouses to remain in potentially abusive relationships.
As academics and lawyers and other practitioners who specialize in immigration law and human rights, we are firmly committed to basic Canadian values of equality and respect for all Canadians, regardless of country of origin. We believe that the rule of law should not be undermined by political ideology. We value the wealth and wisdom of our multi-cultural society and understand that we will thrive as a country by cultivating our common Canadian qualities and not by exploiting our differences for partisan gain.
If you believe in the concept of family reunification, that is the ability of immigrants and Canadians to bring their parents, grandparents, children and spouses to Canada; if you believe in a fair and timely skilled worker program that recruits the best and the brightest from around the world to join our midst; if you believe in justice for refugees without automatic imprisonment; if you believe in spousal sponsorship processing that does not lead to the potential for greater spousal abuse and neglect, then you must not support the Conservative Party in the upcoming Federal Election on May 2nd.
BARBARA JACKMAN BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
LORNE WALDMAN BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
MITCHELL GOLDBERG BARRISTER & SOLICITOR MONTREAL
RICHARD GOLDMAN BARRISTER & SOLICITOR MONTREAL
PETER LARLEE BARRISTER & SOLICITOR VANCOUVER
HILARY EVANS CAMERON BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
AVIVA BASMAN BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
TIM WICHERT BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
CAROLE SIMONE DAHAN BARRISTER & SOLICITOR, DIRECTOR REFUGEE LAW OFFICE TORONTO
RONALD LEE BARRISTER & SOLICITOR HAMILTON
JENNIFER BOND PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA LAW SCHOOL
AUDREY MACKLIN PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LAW SCHOOL
PETER SHOWLER PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA LAW SCHOOL
SEAN REHAAG PROFESSOR OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL
GERI SADOWAY BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
HADAYT NAZIMI BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
ANDREW BROUWER BARRISTER & SOLICITOR TORONTO
ALEXANDER NING NOTARY PUBLIC IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT VANVOUVER
FRANCOIS CREPEAU PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY MCGILL UNIVERSITY
JULIANNA BEAUDOIN PhD CANDIDATE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO
DONALD GALLOWAY PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA
STEWART ISTVANIFFY BARRISTER & SOLICITOR MONTREAL
SHARRYN J AIKEN ASSOCIATE DEAN(GRADUATE STUDIES & RESEARCH)
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR FACULTY OF LAW QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY
CHANTAL TIE PART TIME PROFESSOR IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE LAW UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA
MICHAEL BOSSIN PART TIME PROFESSOR IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE LAW UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA
BRENDA WEMP BARRISTER & SOLICITOR VANCOUVER
Apr 20, 2011 at 5:06pm
I never ceases to amaze me that immigrants, including at least one former refugee in Vancouver-Kingsway, agree to run as candidates for the Conservatives. Get your heads out of the sand people. If Harper had been Prime Minister when your boat arrived off the west coast of BC you'd have been shipped back to SE Asia without a hearing. Nice to see your response to our hospitality is to support laws that will prevent future generations from receiving the kind of warm welcome you did. Disgusting!
Apr 20, 2011 at 9:19pm
Wow, a bunch of lawyers who earn money by bringing in immigrants support more immigrants into the country? What a surprise!!!!
Face it, Canada loses with family reunification. My friend is a perfect example. Smart, educated, young, the perfect immigrant. She should be allowed with minimal trouble. Then, she wants to bring in her parents. I understand why she would want that, but why would canada want to bring in two elderly people who will cost millions in health care bills and add nothing to the economy? I mean, I feel for the immigrants who miss their parents but Canada is allowing them into the country to pay for the elderly already in the country we cannot afford, not to bring in two more elderly for every good worker. These lawyers want 20,000 senior citizens per year brought into Canada when we have only 3 workers per senior citizen already?? Does no one see a problem with this?
Apr 20, 2011 at 9:53pm
waahhh....those that have the most to gain by lax immigration policy, like these lawyers, are the ones complaining the most
Apr 21, 2011 at 6:11am
#5 is a good thing
Apr 21, 2011 at 9:24am
Could someone in the know-without spin-tell me exactly what paid services immigrants 65+ are entitled to once they arrive here? Some number-crunching please.
Apr 21, 2011 at 10:28am
If Canada is soooo bad, why come here? My great grandfather came from Ireland and he and his brothers WORKED! There was no welfare and grants for them, If you dont like it here, then leave!
Concerned Group 2
Apr 21, 2011 at 10:39am
The Conservatives have been lying about their immigration policy/record big time...
Apr 21, 2011 at 1:37pm
What these lawyers and "academics" fail to understand is that people who immigrated here 30 years ago, before the immigration industry boom, don't view today's immigration policies as a positive. We came with nothing, we received nothing, and we built a better life for all. We came, and asked "what can we do for Canada". Many of today's immigrants ask "what can Canada do for me".
The Liberals used us for votes, and moved on to the next group when we became too educated. No thanks. I'm voting for the party that protects the Canada we helped build, not the one that protect the lawyers who make their money off the backs of others.
Apr 21, 2011 at 2:06pm
I disagree. The Conservative Party is an all inclusive political institution. Its economic policies of lower taxes, fiscal responsibility and balanced budget benefit Canadians across the demographic spectrum.
Apr 21, 2011 at 2:32pm
It is simplistic, elitist and racist to characterize "ethnic minorities" as having a single political interest. They are Canadians and will vote for the party that they believe will serve their interests best. If low taxes and a strong economy is their top priority they will vote Conservative. Stop reducing people to one dimension!