Am Johal: Police-related deaths unnecessary

As the media mayhem over the Stanley Cup riot subsides, there are more important issues that need to be addressed related to policing in this city, and in BC.

On July 22 at about 8:33 p.m., members of the Vancouver Police Department approached a man wielding a machete on Powell Street, near Dunlevy. He was initially shot by a beanbag gun, and then, a short time later, with shots from a gun.

Within a few minutes of being approached, Darrell Elroy Barnes was on the pavement. Emergency-health services personnel were immediately on the scene and Barnes was officially pronounced deceased at Vancouver General Hospital a short time later.

The shooting was the third police-related death in Vancouver in July 2011.

Escalation of force is a complicated issue, but it needs to be said that members of both municipal police departments and the RCMP are often too quick to resort to disproportionate force when it is unnecessary. Is it really essential to shoot to kill even when an officer’s gun is drawn?

As identified by SFU criminologist David MacAlister, the number of police-involved deaths in B.C. is alarmingly high and apparently out of proportion to the number of deaths arising in other Canadian jurisdictions. In B.C., 267 individuals died through police involvement between 1992 and 2007.

On a per capita basis, you are about 2.5 times more likely to die through police involvement in this province than in Ontario. B.C. is Canada’s capital for police deaths according to the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.

Based on the numerous incidents where police have responded disproportionately to a given situation, there has been a failure in looking at how police train their own members. Additionally, the rank-and-file culture within departments is toxic, and oftentimes disconnected from reality. There needs to be better training for officers on dealing with people with mental-health issues, with a specific focus on use-of-force training, which trains officers to de-escalate situations.

As well, when there is a police-related death, there is often a cone of silence that develops from police forces that undermines transparency. On August 13, 2007, Paul Boyd was shot a total of eight times after a confrontation with the Vancouver Police Department. Crown counsel decided not to press charges.

Michael Van Hubbard was shot to death by police on March 20, 2009 while carrying an X-acto knife. He was mistaken as a suspect in a vehicle break-in.

In B.C., until the system finally changes, the police still investigate the police even when an officer is believed to have been responsible for causing the death of someone under their care. This is at odds with the way things are done in some other Canadian jurisdictions, and in other democracies.

Dick Bent, formerly a senior member of the RCMP in B.C. who withheld an important email during the Braidwood Inquiry on the tasering death of Robert Dziekanksi, is now been hired on contract by the provincial government to make recommendations on a strategic and operational framework for the newly proposed Independent Investigation Office.

As the civic-election debate will soon begin in earnest, citizens deserve a rational discussion of the issues rather than a sensationalized story about a four-hour riot. At the provincial level, the attorney general and the premier also need to support a process for the Independent Investigation Unit that will actually have public credibility.

The well-oiled PR machines of the VPD and the RCMP should not be setting up the rules of the game for the new Independent Investigation Office. They don’t have the credibility or the track record to be giving sage advice.

Am Johal is a Vancouver writer with an interest in civil liberties and fair treatment of everyone regardless of their socioeconomic status.

Comments

5 Comments

Not a armchair critic

Sep 4, 2011 at 8:51pm

The examples that you have brought forward as police using too much force. A guy with a xacto knife coming a officers, we have all seen the video. A guy with a chain that had already knocked out one police officer which tried alternate methods. And then the story you led with a guy with a machete coming at officers again. I find too many times there are lots of critics, but no one offering an alternative, not saying what they would do if they had been in the same shoes...Get out of your warm cozy sheltered life and do something to change the world instead of sitting and been hyper critical of the police. Either step-up or shut-up.

james green

Sep 5, 2011 at 1:34am

These are just a few concerns we should have. What is the VPDs plan- the chief that is to deals, with gangs, human trafficking for the sex trade, pimps, the drug trade, violence against women, domestic violence and deployment of officers should also be clear to the public. For example a pimp in this city launders money, evades taxes, beats the sex trade workers he controls, traffics women form Vegas to Vancouver, and lives off the avails but has never served time or been arrested.
Chief Chu has a great deal more to answer for than the riots as the leader of the VPD. He also needs to tell us why he said we do not need more police at the last budget rounds in the city.
I would also like to know why an inexperienced officer was hired in the first place to lead the second largest city in Canada and is now paid over $400,000 a year.
Lucy you got some splaing to do.

Mike Lowrey

Sep 5, 2011 at 10:08am

This guy sounds like the next David Eby.

Shane7

Sep 5, 2011 at 1:25pm

I agree with the author's disclaimer at the bottom that everyone should be treated fairly. But I'm not sure he grasps some of the larger issues here involving police use of force. I don't need to write my own article but it would even out this seemingly anti-police one that does not tell the full story of the briefly-discussed incidents. It's unfortunate when anyone dies but I'm sure there are very complex circumstances surrounding all of the above.

Catalina Morrison

Sep 5, 2011 at 2:06pm

You Am Johal clearly have never been in a life threatening situation. Your ill informed comments and selective use of statistics clearly is self serving in creating an emotional response from your readers.