God and the Indian has important tales to tell

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      By Drew Hayden Taylor. Directed by Renae Morriseau. At the Firehall Arts Centre on Wednesday, April 10. Continues until April 20

      Ojibwa playwright Drew Hayden Taylor has written many successful comedies; with this new work, he sets himself the challenge of writing something that’s not for laughs. God and the Indian is a respectful treatment of one of the most painful chapters of Canadian history, but its lack of focus makes it emotionally unsatisfying.

      Taylor starts off with a solid premise: a Cree woman who calls herself Johnny breaks into the office of newly appointed assistant bishop George King and accuses him of abusing her decades ago, when he was her teacher at a residential school run by the Anglican Church. King is steadfast in his denials as Johnny offers up shards of her broken life.

      Not much actually happens until near the end of the first act, though, partly because Taylor seems undecided about the play’s central concern: is it to establish the veracity of Johnny’s accusations, to contemplate the church’s complicity in this systematic attack on First Nations culture, or to give a voice to its survivors? These are all worthy aspirations, but Taylor’s talky, repetitive text siphons off dramatic tension from the central conflict.

      Both characters feel more like mouthpieces for positions than flesh-and-blood people. In Johnny’s case, that may be intentional: she has been robbed of her identity and repeatedly calls herself lost, invisible, a ghost. When she asks King why the church treated Native people with such contempt, he replies with a vague generalization: “To a lot of people it seemed like a good idea at the time.” But what did it seem like to him? He admits to having taught at the school for two years when he was young; watching him try to explain his participation in what he now recognizes as a travesty would be much more interesting than watching him recite platitudes.

      Renae Morriseau’s direction underscores the script’s lack of focus: both Tantoo Cardinal, who plays Johnny, and Michael Kopsa, as King, shuffle aimlessly around Lauchlin Johnson’s handsome set for most of the first act. Kopsa does his best to get a bead on King, but the character as written is passive and unconvincing. Cardinal, who seemed a little tentative on opening night, shows us Johnny’s vulnerability as well as her resilience.

      Ironically, Taylor’s trademark irreverent humour is both a strength and a weakness here. At times, he can’t resist a cheap laugh that doesn’t ring true in the world of the play, but occasionally grim one-liners offer relief within King and Johnny’s standoff: “When he said, ‘Suffer the little children,’ did you have to take it so seriously?” Johnny asks, pointing to a painting of Jesus on King’s wall.

      We need to hear the stories Taylor is telling in God and the Indian. This production is a premiere; perhaps future mountings will bring the play’s themes into sharper relief.

      Comments

      7 Comments

      Jane Martin

      Apr 11, 2013 at 2:26pm

      Contrary to your reviewer, I felt this play was an emotional wallup and the actors were not only three dimensional but representatives of very real personae in the world we live in. I believe Drew Taylor playwright was being deliberately cagey about the guilt of the 'man of god' as we are all unable to face the horrors of what occurred at these terrible institutions to innocent children. For anyone to walk out of that play not feeling profoundly moved is hard to understand even if only by the fierce, trnscendant performance by one of Canada's foremost actors.

      Hazlit

      Apr 12, 2013 at 7:32am

      Hmm, I was leaning towards going to see this, but after reading this review I'm enough on the fence about "victim theatre" that I think I'll stay home.

      Karen

      Apr 15, 2013 at 11:41pm

      I too disagree with this review. I thought the play was excellent and Tantoo Cardinal's performance outstanding. I have heard many of the platitudes that
      Bishop King recited and probadly used a few myself!! I liked the play because the tragedy and the ambiguity were so well portrayed.

      Linda

      Apr 17, 2013 at 11:26pm

      No one has mentioned the significance of the ending when Bishop King opens his desk drawer and finds something missing. Suddenly the entire play needs to be rethought in light of this discovery, and the reason for perceived ambiguities and lack of focus becomes clear. I agree that this play is profoundly moving and you have only to walk down East Hastings street to see that the effects of Canada's Residential School system are still very much with us.

      Angela

      Apr 17, 2013 at 11:39pm

      Just came home from God and the Indian, and I couldn't disagree with you more-the "lack of focus" for me, as an Indigenous person is very true to life. It was incredibly emotional for me-in fact I broke down sobbing at the end of the first act. Actually, thinking about it now-the fact that you write that it was "emotionally unsatisfying" is probably exactly why I enjoyed it so much-how are we supposed to be emotionally satisfied with such a topic? We cannot watch Bishop King try to explain himself-it is completely unexplainable. I personally think an explanation would be much less unsatisfying, and much less true to life.

      Angela

      Apr 17, 2013 at 11:40pm

      and of course I meant much MORE unsatisfying...oops.

      janice

      Apr 24, 2013 at 12:32pm

      I missed it. Will it be playing any where else soon?