Damage to Chinatown murals linked to Vancouver housing affordability and anger at so-called "foreign buyers"
Someone has defaced a series of historical murals in Vancouver’s Chinatown neighbourhood.
The paintings were created in 2010 by Shu Ren (Arthur) Cheng and are located at 490 Columbia Street near the corner of Pender.
Richard Marquez, a Vancouver resident who works in the non-profit sector, noticed the graffiti over the Labour Day long weekend.
In a telephone interview, Marquez told the Straight he worries the damage to the murals is an expression of frustration about housing affordability in Vancouver and the result of anger directed at the alleged economic influence of so-called “foreign buyers”.
“You look at all the development that is going around—displacement, gentrification, the condo-ization of Chinatown,” he explained. “And I’m wondering, is this a manifestation of that? Inarticulate and brutal about it, not acknowledging that this is a historic mural by Arthur Cheng.”
A March 2015 analysis by Bing Thom Architects’ Andy Yan found 66 percent of single-family properties in Vancouver were assessed at $1 million or more. That was double the portion worth that much five years earlier. Despite there existing no solid evidence of a quantifiable link between foreign buyers and Vancouver property values, debates around affordability have increasingly focused on the supposed role of money from China.
Marquez said the way the Vancouver Chinatown mural was damaged reminds him of anti-Chinese graffiti that’s appeared this year in San Francisco in the area where he grew up. There in the Portola neighbourhood, several buildings have been tagged with the words, “No more Chinese”.
Titled “A Snapshot of History”, the Vancouver Chinatown murals stand in recognition of the history of Chinese Canadians and those communities’ contributions to British Columbia.
“One panel depicts the Goon family,” reads a description at VancouverMurals.ca. “Hung Get Goon, dreamt of becoming a lawyer, but was never able to go to law school due to discrimination. Instead, his father became the city editor of the Chinese Times while his mother, Ruth, ran a fish shop in Chinatown. The other two panels of the mural feature a reproduction of a 1905 photo of a silk merchant in Chinatown and a rendering of a 1936 photo of men sitting outside a barber shop at Carrall and Pender.
“The mural is significant because it embodies the indefatigable spirit of the Chinese to persevere no matter where they are in the world, hoping the hard work sewn by one generation will be reaped by the next,” it continues.
At the mural’s unveiling in 2010, Cheng’s son explicitly mentioned racism faced by Canadian Chinese communities in the past.
“It’s in memory of our ancestors and how they came out here and how hard it was for them to begin life here in Canada,” he said. “There was so much discrimination. It was really hard for them to get by—but they survived, they survived.”
To the general public, illegal graffiti might look as if it is created without any sort of order or respect for the law. The latter may be true, but there is a sort of unwritten code most street artists follow.
Most painters abide by a respect for larger murals that says they should not be damaged by tags. Taggers are also supposed to stay away from churches, heritage buildings, and independent businesses. In 2013, a Vancouver resident who used the pseudonym Mohinder took heat for breaking those rules.
The Straight explored graffiti culture in Vancouver in a 2010 cover story. That article discussed how public murals deter illegal graffiti because most street artists do follow their code of ethics. It found the City of Vancouver actually has data proving a sanctioned mural will result in the surrounding area seeing a decline in illegal tagging.
Marquez suggested the Vancouver Chinatown mural should be restored and somehow protected.
“It’s not the first time I’ve seen graffiti on it but it is the first time I’ve seen this level, graffiti on every single slab,” he said.
Sep 8, 2015 at 11:57am
Nice try Travis. Its just idiot taggers doing what they always have done: treat the city like crap. There is nothing to tie this to affordability and anger at so-called "foreign buyers" other than you making up a story where none exists. You might was well say the idiots tagging trees are "anti-leaf".
I agree that it's upsetting that these murals were defaced
Sep 8, 2015 at 12:29pm
But I am not entirely convinced it happened because of the affordability issues we face. I have seen many of my favourite murals (and several small businesses) around the city tagged up. I blame asshole behavior more than anything. The No Pipelines idiot who went nuts on Commercial Drive as well as many small businesses all over the east side comes to mind. But, I do recognize that there is a growing wave of misplaced backlash against Chinese-Canadians here, because of affordability. I just am not sure that these murals being defaced is a result of it.
Sep 8, 2015 at 12:31pm
the title says the vandalism is linked to foreign ownership issues but the article says it might be?
well which is it?
Bit of a stretch, no?
Sep 8, 2015 at 1:10pm
Unless they state a reason for the vandalism as being political, or unless "social justice" tags are used... isn't weak conjecture?
Code of conduct for street artists? Does this look anything like street art to you? The paintings did.
Don't make shit up.
Sep 8, 2015 at 2:04pm
Stop taking easy short cuts and making assumptions , why don't you talk about how Chinatown/City of Vancouver will clean this up.
Sep 8, 2015 at 2:20pm
Oh is Mohinder back to his old tricks?
Sep 8, 2015 at 2:27pm
How does one come to the conclusion that graffit tagging, thats all over the city is linked to "anger at so-called "foreign buyers" ??
Just poor journalism - where is the Editor
Sep 8, 2015 at 2:41pm
At last we know. This is what "foreign buyers" looks like when written with a spray can by a drunk.
Sep 8, 2015 at 2:55pm
Looks like any other crappy graffiti to me. Not really making much of a statement. I would agree with the other commenters that this is a pretty flimsy story.
Sep 8, 2015 at 3:13pm
This is very sad. Can these murals be restored?
Maybe if they are restored they will need to be behind plexiglas?
Don't really see the connection with foreign buyers though or at least it's not apparent in the photos of the damage. Looks like vandalism by stupid, ignorant goons.