Yeah! Then they can restrict Employment Insurance to anyone who isn't prepared to accept homosexuality!!

The possibilities are endless!

Racism rules, eh? Target a religious group on their beliefs, eh?

You seem to be confusing "legality" with "morality". To many killing innocent life, is an immoral act. People are under no obligation to accept and/or follow immoral laws/orders, and neither is it justified that they be punished for not submitting to such immorality like yours. This is just fascism, and it's not going to be tolerated much longer. Trudeau is not getting voted in again. In fact there may never be a liberal party again after the next election, and the investigations start, since the US is about to kill the Central Bank for the second time in their history. The days of you snowflake Marxist indoctrinated degenerate clowns running the place is over.

I don't think he got it right. He is picking on a religion based on his political view and how he can drum up popularity during populist left/right times. This is the worst next-step, ever.

... simply an excess. The federal Government has no business restricting grants on the basis of thought, belief, opinion or expression, that's clearly unconstitutional. Further, it engages the discrimination provisions because certain well-established faiths think abortion is immoral, and to restrict their ability to secure funds for programs they run is discriminatory.

This is nothing more than the sort of excess that is quickly making the Neomarxist left irrelevant---clearly they have this revolutionary view that everyone who isn't "one of them" should be not allowed to work, not allowed to receive funding, basically, I dunno, maybe they could put this sort of "values test" on welfare, as @Anonymous said for EI? How about for getting a SIN? So, if you won't agree to a political values statement, you cannot get a SIN, cannot work, and cannot collect welfare, so you can starve to death, which is what Marxists wanted, a violent revolution to kill off the wrongthinkers---this Neomarxism is just the same agenda done using legislation and policy. It's completely unacceptable and tyrannical.

I made a typo. Autocorrect. I actually meant fascism... Not the dreaded r word.

Ummm, honestly though, I disagree with you. I think this guy is too far left. It scares me. People like this would gladly erase religion if they could. That's why liberalism works so well, and far-leftism doesn't, as liberalism allows acceptance and peaceful coexistence. Far-leftism only allows its own ideology.

I don't accept it...period.

The soul does not enter the body until first breath so technically not a human being until after you are born .

Abortion is cool, but we don't have a death sentence.

Go figure.

How many of those commenters expressing their “no abortion” views are males who truly cannot ever comprehend what it means to be pregnant? In my opinion, unless you’re one of the people who would be directly affected by a law that would dictate what choices you can make about your own body , you really have no right to enter the argument.