Martyn Brown: B.C. Liberals unchained
One of the funniest scenes in Django Unchained is when the character played by Oscar-winner Christoph Waltz first arrives on the scene in his horse-drawn carriage, lantern swaying, with a bobbing tooth on top. The side of his cart advertised he was a dentist.
For all the world, he looked more like a snake oil salesman—until we learn it was all ruse to mask his true occupation as a bounty hunter. His travelling office was to hide the bodies.
Watching the B.C. Liberals’ campaign bus is just as funny. There, blazoned on the side, is the equivalent of the bobbing molar: a picture of Christy Clark with the promise, “For a Debt-Free B.C.” Coming soon to a street near you.
Don’t let the smiling figure fool you. She’s not laughing at you. And she is certainly not smiling because so many of her candidates refuse to use her name or picture. In some cases, they won’t even use their own party label. Christy is just happy. Nothing gets her down.
Yet inside that smiling face beats the heart of a bounty hunter. She’s gunning for Adrian Dix, supported by a cast of B.C. Liberals who are now unchained, anxious to get even with the NDP. Or at least, to save their hides.
The bodies, like the ghosts that haunt the B.C. Liberal Party, are buried within the bus. At each stop they spring out to shoot the “bad guys”, as the partisan faithful cheer.
But we all know where this plot is headed. We’ve seen this movie before and it’s not pretty. For the anti-heroes, it won’t end well.
In an election that is likely to be a slaughter, the B.C. Liberals are doing their best to make the case for the fundamental reason why people have turned away from them. It is painful to behold.
They are following a script that only reinforces voters’ lack of trust and desire for change. It never helps when your central campaign promise is laughable. Clark’s “vision” for a “debt-free B.C.” is as unhinged from reality as any of Quentin Tarantino’s neo-noir classics. Pulp Fiction and Inglourious Basterds come to mind.
Maybe she got that idea from Brad Bennett. Perhaps he remembers his granddad firing the flaming arrow at that barge in Okanagan Lake to burn the bonds that held B.C.’s debt. He missed, but no matter. They still went up in flames—just like this goofy notion has already done. It has already been dismissed by the vast majority of voters, along with the B.C. Liberals’ claim to a balanced budget.
Today, no one would believe that we can, or should build schools, hospitals, roads and other capital infrastructure without borrowing. Yet eliminating debt is suddenly Christy’s cause célèbe.
She feels so strongly about that, her platform promises to commit 50 percent of future surpluses to paying down the debt. What happened to the 2009 B.C. Liberal platform commitment that “100 per cent of all future operating surpluses will be used first to eliminate the operating debt”?
The Gordon Campbell government cut that direct debt in half, before the 2008 global economic crash. With the record deficits since then, that debt from accumulated deficits, like all types of debt, is going up under the Clark government, not down. With a debt that will have increased by over 50 percent by 2015 under Premier Clark’s watch if her government is reelected and all goes according to her plan, one has to marvel at the audacity and absurdity of making debt her party’s central campaign issue.
Like the silly throne speech speculation about eliminating the provincial sales tax through the miracle healing powers of liquefied natural gas, the latest “debt-free B.C.” boast only serves to highlight the Liberals’ fundamental problem.
Namely, a lack of trust. It is a problem they have largely wished upon themselves through claims that can’t be met, through promises belied by actions, and through hypocritical behaviour, especially in the premier’s office. Instead of acknowledging and addressing that problem, “Today’s B.C. Liberals” are making it worse.
They continue to resort to hyper-partisan attacks that mostly shoot themselves in the foot. They continue to blame others for their own mistakes. They are campaigning with juvenile “Spend-o-Meter” stunts and wild lies about NDP positions on issues like natural gas fracking, spending costs, and tax hikes. And they have tabled a 94-page platform that offers little in the way of new ideas that might create new interest or enthusiasm.
It is telling that the governing party released its entire platform even before the writ was issued. As the NDP is showing, parties that have something new to offer generally unveil their platforms over several days. They use those ideas to help focus their campaigns and to drive the daily agenda, so that those prescriptions for change won’t be lost or ignored.
For the most part, Dix has won the campaign news coverage by targeting attention to issues that are popular, sensible, and easy to communicate in a clip. And contrary to what his opponents would have voters believe, not all of those ideas necessarily involve more spending.
Outlawing partisan government advertising will save taxpayers’ money, not the opposite. Banning political donations from corporations and unions will reduce potential conflicts of interest and will force parties to rely more on individuals for their funding support rather than on special interests. That’s a good thing.
I expect that most voters will welcome Dix’s new position on the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion, politically motivated as it obviously is, to the extent that they agree Vancouver should not become a major oil export port. If that was his position, he should have said it clearly in the first place, but for most voters, it’s better he did so now, before they cast their ballots.
If the NDP follows through on its commitments to increase investments in skills training, reduce log exports, ban cosmetic pesticides, support local farmers, strengthen social programs, et cetera, so much the better. Not many taxpayers are going to bitch about the NDP’s plans to pay for its promised service enhancements with higher taxes on banks, large corporations, and upper income earners, or even with larger short-term deficits.
The difference between the two parties’ approach is not just strategic and tactical. It’s substantive.
With every new serious, popular, and contrasting commitment that Adrian Dix makes, he is also amplifying his chief opponent’s weakness. Clark’s “same-old, same-old” partisan attacks and shop-worn ideas are mostly reinforcing that she and her party are very nearly yesterday’s news.
From Day One, the premier’s main problem has been her lack of vision, focus, and credibility, her inability to shoot straight, and her penchant for firing at the wrong target and still missing the mark.
By contrast, Dix has built voter confidence by showing that, his Kinder Morgan pipeline shift aside, he is not inclined to shoot from the hip. He is answering the B.C. Liberals’ rickety road show and its quietly backfiring campaign strategy with one winning message: “Free at last.”
Time will tell if he can seal the deal through his performance in this Friday’s leaders’ debate and in Monday’s Great Shoot-Out. He should have fun with the B.C. Liberals’ “bobbing molar”, as he also remembers that, in politics, no one’s ever bulletproof.
Apr 23, 2013 at 5:16pm
Sounds like Martyn is looking for a cushy job in the Premier's Office if Dix is elected.
Apr 23, 2013 at 5:35pm
Yes Ray, a axe to grind after getting tossed out.
Apr 23, 2013 at 5:44pm
Looks like Geoff Plant has got a bee in a bonnet about Brown writing for the Straight. Boo hoo....at least Brown has some integrity calling out this wretched government. Unlike yourself. Can't wait for the BC Rail inquiry....How about you Plant??
Roger Ebert Fan
Apr 24, 2013 at 9:10am
AS a BC teacher, I am antipating BC's Education system and its teachers, and by extension, students to be attacked in some kind of political gambit to create a left-right split.
It will fail-miserably-but it will do further damage to the great system of education we have and Bc kids will further suffer due to fruitless politics.
Be the Change
Apr 24, 2013 at 11:09am
it really is getting to be a dog and pony show..the liberals clearly are not focusing on issues, which
must be addressed after being left on the side lines for years.. healthcare,e ducation, families, municpal
issues...forgotten, while they have focused on corp-
orate dealings to bring profit to BC, which until,
now other the the construction boom has not happened.
By the way, how is it we are in debt to %0+ billion, when BC had an unprecedented construction boom?
Apr 24, 2013 at 12:33pm
Are you fucking kidding me Martyn Brown?
It was you fucking incompetents with that Drunk Driver that ran up the fucking Debt.
It was you guys when your guy was running this Province into Debt that awarded PPP Above Market Rates to be paid for by us the BC Residents to Private for Profit Corporations.
It was you guys that conducted the BC Rail 99 year 'Lease' that deserves a Royal Commission in itself.
It was you guys that brought the Debt ridden dubious little pay off Olympics.
It was you guys when in power that were responsible for most if not all the crap we now face.
I no fan of Crusty but she's not responsible as much as the old guard are.
At least the NDP won't be into massive Corporate Welfare.
Apr 24, 2013 at 2:34pm
Martyn Brown wants a job with the party that is likely to hold power for the next two terms.
Apr 24, 2013 at 4:57pm
I don't care if the author is Martyn Brown or Martin Bormann..it's bang-on.
Get over it.
Apr 24, 2013 at 10:56pm
Martyn Brown was a key player within the Premier's office that was the centre of the Campbell culture of arrogance and deceit that has brought the BC Liberals to their demise. Voters will not distinguish between the Campbell and Clark regimes.